Glendale City Council Faces Public Scrutiny Over Housing Policies and Meeting Procedures

September 10, 2025 | Glendale, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Glendale City Council Faces Public Scrutiny Over Housing Policies and Meeting Procedures
The Glendale City Council meeting held on September 9, 2025, began with a reminder about an upcoming event at the Alex Theater Courtyard, scheduled for 5 PM the following day. Attendees were encouraged to participate in discussions regarding the land use element, which will be presented by Mr. Calvert at the police substation on Saturday from 12 PM to 1:30 PM. The deadline for submitting questions related to this topic has been extended indefinitely, allowing residents to engage more thoroughly.

During the meeting, the council members discussed their recent attendance at the Contract Cities Association Fall Educational Summit in Oceanside. This summit provided an opportunity for networking with officials from other cities and included discussions on Proposition 50, which pertains to redistricting, as well as the implications of social media on governance. A notable topic was a chilling discussion on fraud and council misconduct in other cities, as presented by a district attorney from the LA District Attorney's office.

The meeting then transitioned to the first period of oral communications, where members of the public were invited to address the council. Mayor Najarian announced that there were 16 speakers, and each would be allotted two minutes to speak. This decision prompted some concern from the audience regarding the reduced speaking time, as many had prepared for three minutes.

The first speaker, Mike Mohill, raised questions about councilwoman Ellen Gasatrian's personal relationships and criticized the council's plans for high-rise apartment complexes in residential neighborhoods. He expressed concerns about the impact of these developments on local traffic and community character.

Following him, Patrick Murphy opted to withdraw his card, while Tony Passarella highlighted the struggles of disabled and elderly residents, criticizing the council for prioritizing revenue over the needs of vulnerable populations. He emphasized the importance of visibility and representation for these groups in council discussions.

Cameron Nadel then commended the Glendale Police Department for their recent traffic enforcement efforts on Chevy Chase, noting the ongoing issues with reckless driving in the area. He urged for more consistent police presence to address these safety concerns.

The meeting concluded with a series of public comments that underscored community concerns about development, safety, and representation. The council's next steps will likely involve addressing these issues raised by residents and continuing discussions on the land use element and other pressing matters.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Comments

    Sponsors

    Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Scribe from Workplace AI
    Family Portal
    Family Portal