The Mendocino County Board of Supervisors convened on September 9, 2025, to address several pressing issues, including housing regulations and fire safety compliance. The meeting featured public comments that highlighted concerns regarding the county's permitting processes and adherence to state fire safety laws.

One significant discussion arose from a licensed building contractor who expressed concerns about the county's Class K permitting regulations. He noted that while these regulations aim to assist rural homeowners, they may inadvertently favor certain individuals, leading to perceptions of favoritism and nepotism within the code enforcement department. Despite these concerns, the contractor shared his positive experiences with the Planning and Building Department, advocating for policies that would enable more affordable housing options, including Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs).

Deep Lisonbee, a representative from District 5, voiced her frustrations regarding the enforcement of fire safety regulations, specifically referencing the state's Public Resources Code 4290. She emphasized the importance of adhering to these regulations, particularly in light of past wildfires in the region. Lisonbee criticized the county's decision to not fully enforce these requirements for pre-existing structures, arguing that this could lead to significant safety risks. She pointed out that many structures permitted through amnesty programs do not comply with the necessary fire safety standards, raising questions about the county's responsibility in ensuring compliance.

Lisonbee further clarified that the documents referenced in the county's response to fire safety compliance were internal Cal Fire documents, which do not authorize the county to bypass state regulations. She urged the board to reconsider its approach to fire safety enforcement, stressing the need for clear communication and adherence to established laws.

The meeting concluded with a call for further discussions on these critical issues, particularly regarding the balance between facilitating housing development and ensuring public safety through rigorous enforcement of fire regulations. The board acknowledged the need for ongoing dialogue and potential policy revisions to address the concerns raised by community members.