In a pivotal meeting held on September 9, 2025, the Costa Mesa City Council gathered to discuss critical issues surrounding immigration enforcement and legal assistance for residents. The atmosphere in the city hall was charged with urgency as council members and community advocates explored options to support those affected by recent federal immigration policies.

The council received a presentation from Hall Barlow, who outlined potential avenues for establishing a legal assistance program aimed at helping residents navigate the complexities of immigration enforcement. The discussion centered on the city’s possible participation in the Perdomo lawsuit, which challenges the legality of roving immigration patrols that have reportedly targeted individuals based on their ethnicity. This lawsuit has gained traction following a temporary restraining order issued by a district court, which deemed such detentions based solely on race or ethnicity as lacking reasonable suspicion.

Barlow emphasized the importance of funding, noting that while federal grants cannot be used for this purpose, the city’s general fund could support a legal defense program. The council considered partnering with established organizations like the Public Law Center and the Immigrant Defenders Law Center, both of which have experience in providing legal assistance to immigrants. These organizations could help Costa Mesa residents who are at or below 250% of the federal poverty level, ensuring that those in need have access to legal representation.

Community members voiced their support for the council's efforts, highlighting the significant role immigrants play in the local economy and the urgent need for legal assistance. Betsy Densmore, a resident and former executive director of a legal services foundation, urged the council to allocate at least $200,000 to support legal counsel for residents facing wrongful detention. She emphasized that many immigrants contribute positively to the community and deserve protection of their rights.

The council also discussed the implications of the Supreme Court's recent decision to grant a stay on the temporary restraining order, which could affect the upcoming preliminary injunction hearing scheduled for September 24. Council members debated the potential risks and benefits of joining the Perdomo case, with some expressing concerns about the impact on federal funding for other city programs.

As the meeting progressed, the council was tasked with deciding whether to participate in the lawsuit as an intervenor or to support an amicus brief alongside other cities. The discussions underscored the city’s commitment to addressing the challenges faced by its immigrant population while navigating the complexities of federal immigration law.

In conclusion, the Costa Mesa City Council's meeting highlighted a significant moment in the ongoing dialogue about immigration enforcement and community support. As the council prepares to make decisions that could shape the future of legal assistance for residents, the voices of community members remain a vital part of the conversation, advocating for justice and protection of rights in the face of federal policies.