The Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations convened on September 9, 2025, to discuss the significant impact of scientific corruption on public perception and policies regarding vaccines. A key focus of the meeting was a controversial study led by Dr. Marcus Zervos, head of infectious disease at Henry Ford Health System, which examined the health outcomes of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children.

Dr. Zervos, known for his pro-vaccine stance and involvement in high-profile investigations, agreed to conduct the study to challenge existing beliefs about vaccination. The study involved 18,468 subjects and aimed to assess the long-term health effects of childhood vaccinations. Preliminary findings indicated alarming trends: vaccinated children were reported to be over four times more likely to have asthma, experience higher rates of ear infections, and face significant developmental delays compared to their unvaccinated peers. Notably, the unvaccinated group showed no instances of brain dysfunction, diabetes, or learning disabilities.

The implications of these findings are profound, suggesting that current vaccination policies may be contributing to serious health issues in children. The urgency of publishing these results was emphasized during the meeting, with some participants arguing that the study could be one of the most important in the field of epidemiology. Concerns were raised about the potential repercussions for Dr. Zervos should he publish findings that contradict the prevailing pro-vaccine narrative, highlighting the pressure researchers face in the current scientific climate.

The discussion underscored the need for transparency and integrity in scientific research, particularly regarding public health policies. As the meeting concluded, the subcommittee recognized the importance of further investigation into the relationship between vaccination and chronic health outcomes in children, signaling a potential shift in how vaccine-related data is perceived and utilized in policy-making.