The Wasilla City Council convened on September 8, 2025, to discuss a significant amendment to the ordinance governing temporary appointments for key management positions. The proposed change aims to reduce the maximum duration of temporary appointments from one year to six months, a move that has sparked considerable debate among council members.

Council member Graham expressed concerns about the implications of a one-year temporary appointment, suggesting that it could allow individuals without a strong commitment to the city to make substantial policy changes. He argued that a six-month limit would encourage timely transitions to permanent appointments and maintain organizational stability. "Six months is the appropriate number," he stated, emphasizing the need for a clear timeline to avoid prolonged uncertainty within the city's management structure.

The council's discussion highlighted the challenges of filling high-level positions, such as the finance director and city planner. Some members acknowledged the current hiring landscape, noting that it can take significantly longer to find qualified candidates for these roles. Council member Leonard pointed out that the city has faced difficulties in attracting suitable applicants, citing a recent experience where only two out of seven candidates were deemed qualified for a position.

City Attorney Jennifer Alexander clarified that the ordinance amendment would not limit the mayor's ability to make interim appointments but would instead define the duration of those appointments. She noted that the change is intended to ensure compliance with city codes and the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) regulations, which differentiate between temporary and permanent employees.

While some council members supported the six-month limit, others advocated for retaining the one-year provision, arguing that it provides necessary flexibility in a competitive job market. Council member Cuddles suggested rephrasing the ordinance to specify "up to one year" rather than a strict one-year limit, allowing for discretion based on the city's hiring needs.

The council ultimately decided to continue deliberating on the amendment, recognizing the importance of balancing the need for effective management with the realities of the current job market. As the city navigates these challenges, the outcome of this ordinance could significantly impact the future of its leadership and operational effectiveness. The council's next steps will be crucial in determining how best to address the community's needs while ensuring a stable and capable management team.