During the recent City of Cumming Council meeting, a significant discussion centered around a conditional use permit (CUP) application from Samaritan Holdings LLC, which seeks to construct ten townhomes in the Central Business District at 102 Samaritan Drive. This vacant property is located directly behind a Dunkin' Donuts shop, and the proposal has sparked considerable debate regarding its alignment with the city’s comprehensive plan and its potential impact on local traffic.
The Planning Commission had previously reviewed the application and unanimously recommended its denial, citing concerns that the project does not conform to the city’s goals for commercial land use. Key issues raised included inadequate off-street parking, insufficient landscaping and open space, and potential traffic complications at the unsignalized intersection with Canton Highway. The Commission emphasized that the proposed development could worsen existing traffic challenges, particularly for vehicles turning west onto Canton Highway.
In defense of the application, Robert McCarra, one of the applicants, argued that the project aligns with the city’s vision for mixed-use development, which aims to revitalize the area by integrating residential spaces into the downtown core. He contended that the proposed parking exceeds city requirements and that the development would contribute positively to the community by creating a livable downtown environment.
McCarra also addressed concerns about landscaping and traffic, asserting that the design includes adequate green space and that the traffic generated by the townhomes would be minimal compared to the existing commercial traffic in the area. He emphasized that the development would not only meet but exceed the parking requirements, providing additional guest spaces and utilizing nearby parking facilities during peak times.
The council's decision on this CUP application will have lasting implications for the Central Business District and its development trajectory. As the city continues to grow, balancing residential needs with commercial interests remains a critical challenge. The council is expected to deliberate further on this matter, weighing the potential benefits of new housing against the concerns raised by the Planning Commission and local residents.