Syracuse Residents Express Privacy Concerns Over SPD's Drone Surveillance Program

September 16, 2025 | Syracuse City, Onondaga County, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Syracuse Residents Express Privacy Concerns Over SPD's Drone Surveillance Program
During the Common Council Public Hearing on September 15, 2025, significant concerns were raised regarding the Syracuse Police Department's (SPD) proposed drone program, known as the DFR (Drone First Responder) initiative. Community members expressed fears about privacy violations and the potential misuse of data collected by the drones.

Davis Goldstein, a resident of Syracuse, highlighted the risks associated with the program, emphasizing that it could lead to an invasion of privacy for residents. He pointed out that the SPD's current use of technology, including AI-driven license plate reading, has already resulted in data being shared with numerous police departments without adequate oversight. Goldstein warned that the DFR program would exacerbate these issues, as it involves continuous filming of public spaces, potentially capturing sensitive moments without residents' knowledge.

Goldstein also noted that a significant portion of the community—approximately 72%—opposes the DFR program, indicating a disconnect between the SPD's plans and public sentiment. He raised concerns about the contract with Axon, the company providing the drone technology, which allows for data sharing with government authorities, including immigration enforcement agencies. This has led to fears that sensitive data could be misused, despite SPD assurances to the contrary.

Moreover, Goldstein pointed out that the SPD has a troubling history of mishandling sensitive data, referencing the flock camera program that inadvertently shared Syracuse residents' data with thousands of police departments nationwide. He argued that given the declining crime rates in Syracuse—down 27% year-over-year—resources might be better allocated to improving existing police practices rather than investing in new surveillance technologies that raise public concern.

The discussions at the hearing reflect a growing apprehension among Syracuse residents about the balance between public safety and the protection of civil liberties. As the council considers the DFR program, the community's call for transparency and accountability in policing practices remains a critical focus.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI