In a pivotal meeting of the Judicial Compensation Commission on September 17, 2025, members grappled with the pressing issue of judicial funding and legislative strategy. The discussion highlighted concerns over the declining solvency of the state's judicial retirement funds, with members noting that delays in addressing the funding problem could exacerbate the situation.

Chairing the meeting, members expressed uncertainty about how to effectively engage with the governor regarding last year's vetoed bill. "We don't know what will move the governor," one member remarked, emphasizing the need for more insight into the governor's concerns. The commission unanimously acknowledged the importance of addressing the funding issue, with one member warning that the longer they wait, the more difficult it may become to resolve.

The conversation also touched on the role of the state bar president, Miss Brooks, who is part of the commission but not directly affected by the pension benefits under discussion. Members agreed that her voting would not present a conflict of interest, allowing her to participate freely.

As the meeting concluded, the commission recognized the urgency of their task. They discussed the possibility of a strategic approach to engage with the governor's office, aiming to clarify concerns and potentially revive legislative efforts. The commission's next steps will be crucial in determining how they navigate the complexities of judicial funding and legislative approval in the coming months.