Los Angeles Board Denies LNE Retail LLC Cannabis License Amid Community Opposition

September 17, 2025 | Los Angeles City, Los Angeles County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Los Angeles Board Denies LNE Retail LLC Cannabis License Amid Community Opposition
The Government Operations Committee meeting on September 16, 2025, focused on an appeal by LNE Retail LLC regarding the denial of a cannabis retail license by the Cannabis Regulation Commission. The meeting featured presentations from the Department of Cannabis Regulation and the applicant, followed by a question-and-answer session.

Jason Killeen, assistant executive director of the Department of Cannabis Regulation, outlined the case, stating that the commission had denied the application after community opposition was voiced during two hearings. Residents raised concerns about odor, cleanliness, and crime associated with the location at 4369 South Van Ness Avenue in Council District 8. Despite the department's recommendation to approve the license, the commission ultimately decided against it, citing significant community objections and perceived omissions by the applicant regarding their business affiliations.

Serena Wu, representing LNE Retail LLC, argued that the denial was based on insufficient evidence and misunderstandings. She contended that the applicant had not misrepresented their business relationship with a nearby delivery service, which had been non-operational since July 2024. Wu emphasized that the retail business was not yet operational and therefore could not be responsible for the issues raised by the community.

During the discussion, committee members questioned the applicant about the alleged omissions and the source of the complaints. The Department of Cannabis Regulation confirmed that no violations had been found against the applicant, and there was no evidence linking them to the odor complaints. The commission's decision was primarily based on the perceived lack of transparency regarding the relationship between the retail and delivery businesses.

The meeting concluded with the committee members considering the appeal, highlighting the complexities of cannabis regulation and community relations in Los Angeles. The outcome of the appeal remains pending, with significant implications for local cannabis operations and community engagement.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal