[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",5983463,"mediaKeyId","5773900-0f125b8505545ac2aa113249a8f6645a","parentId",5773900,"title","Finance committee asks administration for clearer accounting of grants and budget impacts under Resolution 25‑09","audioSeconds",624,"startMs",3646000,"endMs",4270000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5773900-0f125b8505545ac2aa113249a8f6645a&start=3646&end=4270","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5773900-0f125b8505545ac2aa113249a8f6645a/thumbnail_3646000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/5983463/Barnstable-County/Massachusetts/Finance-committee-asks-administration-for-clearer-accounting-of-grants-and-budget-impacts-under-Resolution-2509","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5983463-b4c2d61e696ea60a5704f4b7af765042/orig.mp4?Expires=1770908490&Signature=WOhzIdJq~BVt9X8we6iELQ8isQmTHKGTqf5uqPnkZh3ncAhlwpeEqcfGubJ-pJwpthKNOklFpj4bRo-1RTKqVGL65yrHe2nuTAbwAaS9bQ4MCMGzMteJkZv~NZidUkvZd6W-JKAhOlC8E2EdjrykXhDboWuAIR3DEYRJbhDClaF4vgV4irEwJTa6IN4z4HUVF5fjv0ehoWj78kuDYeH~aiAVIO5~FfZiKcTyUoX40jOUlFHKoHynCp6AEdSgCTrTBjkLmSPqHpjMpD1EJFkNhlXE1Ldeq9O3gB8FIPIHiGU4ru8BoJKcs0INkxqlHtNAytuWbKMu2ufKAXVRnXWWmw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Barnstable County","date","2025-09-16T08:18:26Z","article","Delegate Carl Preisell opened discussion of Resolution 25‑09, asking whether the committee had sufficient information to report to the assembly and whether additional data or presentations were required. \"I would like to at least see if the committee believes the information we've received is sufficient,\" Preisell said.

Members said the material submitted in writing was helpful but did not show how grants are integrated into the county's fiscal year budgets or how a terminated grant would be handled operationally. Delegate Killian and Delegate Warner emphasized the committee's need to know whether grants are counted in the revenue lines used to build FY‑27 budgets, whether grants that arrive after budget adoption create surpluses, and what contingency plans exist if awarded grants (for example AmeriCorps) are later terminated.

Assistant County Administrator Vera Harrick told the panel the administration has responded to the written questions submitted and that the county and commission can provide additional follow‑up. \"We responded to the questions that were submitted to us,\" Harrick said, and she encouraged the committee to submit a second, more targeted round of questions for a richer discussion and an in‑person presentation if needed.

Committee members agreed to develop a follow‑up list of specific questions, route them through the committee clerk (Owen) and request a future meeting with the administration, finance director (Carol) and commission staff to discuss grant accounting, grant‑dependent staffing and contingency planning. No formal votes were taken on Resolution 25‑09 at this meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","September 15, 2025 Assembly of Delegates Standing Committee on Finance","oneSentenceSummary","Committee members reviewed Resolution 25‑09, which directs a study of grant funding, and requested more detailed answers from county administration and the Cape Cod Commission about how grant awards and terminations affect the annual budget and operational staffing.","taxTitle","Barnstable County, Massachusetts","taxId",12948,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},5983469,"County proposes Superior Courthouse exterior restoration and launches facility master plan with $70.9M deferred needs",1775,1278000,3053000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5773900-0f125b8505545ac2aa113249a8f6645a&start=1278&end=3053","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5773900-0f125b8505545ac2aa113249a8f6645a/thumbnail_1278000.jpg","/articles/5983469/Barnstable-County/Massachusetts/County-proposes-Superior-Courthouse-exterior-restoration-and-launches-facility-master-plan-with-709M-deferred-needs","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5983469-a6269d689483de925c4875ca402fc1b0/orig.mp4?Expires=1770908490&Signature=ceqi4g-qfHx4WB-2PZjdey1ru~FkULS8aL6mYectMPUr9GDOSea4M-0fUYm5AuV0ywr1nd~ZXzKjSwjRFaHYTcMMzDroR2VZcQcN0l7ntA8bapQ6Ac67wqkdrUXpJBSTPAraievsyCGStuIxfhTr0eCCiz9xV8-EXkujSoXsZtsnfuFvFgkNPI8Mk3fis~rzv0wHEAuWRDuNSTyy57I0X3e8~VOMN7KpqwHP7rCnzJPSwmaB-VD1nx45UGfJxDf4s6CQHKUl1BYRW-P2UOrhvEHtBXo888ZGdjQgFdZ9XYfL20PupdRpc1h7KCAQH-ZgWe4a~rN9r4M3c27L2A7KeA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Paul Rosala, assets and infrastructure manager for Barnesville County, told the committee the Superior Courthouse needs exterior restoration including masonry repointing, wood column and facade repair, window replacement and some basement foundation work. He said consultants performed visual inspections and test cuts and found \"extensive rotting\" in upper wood elements and deteriorated mortar in the basement.

Rosala presented two scenarios and preliminary cost estimates: performing work in an occupied building over approximately 12 to 15 months with an estimated total project cost of $6,000,000, or completing the work in an unoccupied building over roughly 8 to 10 months at an estimated cost of $5,260,000. He noted the occupied scenario would require temporary relocations of staff and significant noise and vibration mitigations because the courts use sensitive recording equipment.

Rosala said hazardous materials abatement will be required when windows are removed and that coordinating construction around the courts’ schedule is a major constraint: \"We're looking to get construction documents finished this winter and hopefully bidding the project this winter and starting construction in the 2026,\" he said, while adding the schedule remained \"to be determined\" pending coordination with the courts.

On funding, Rosala described prior appropriations and potential reimbursements: $1,000,000 was appropriated in FY24 and $6,000,000 in FY25; Rosala said the full $7,000,000 would be eligible for 75% state reimbursement, leaving a county share of $1,750,000 if that reimbursement is approved. Assistant County Administrator Vera Harrick later told the committee she did not anticipate the project reappearing in the FY27 capital budget because funds were already appropriated in FY24 and FY25.

Committee members raised lease and longer‑term financing concerns. Rosala said the county's lease with the courts dates to 1989, includes multiple minor amendments and contains a clause that court reimbursement of capital is \"subject to appropriations,\" leaving the county exposed if courts do not appropriate funds. He said the county bills courts and then receives a delayed reimbursement (described as about a one‑and‑a‑half year lag in practice). Rosala urged revisiting the lease terms and better aligning capital planning with court needs.

Rosala also reported on a countywide facility condition assessment and master plan performed by consultant Gensler. The assessment identified $70,900,000 of deferred maintenance across county properties; Rosala said the courts' share of deferred needs under the current reimbursement model is $41,600,000. He said the master plan will include short‑, medium‑ and long‑term scenarios for space use, potential renovation of the old jail versus new construction, and options for staff relocation or consolidation.

No formal committee votes were taken on courthouse construction or master‑plan items. Members asked staff to return with more refined relocation cost estimates and to involve finance director Carol and the courts in follow‑up discussions about lease, reimbursement timing and capital planning.","Barnesville County staff briefed the finance committee on an exterior restoration plan for the Superior Courthouse — two execution scenarios were presented — and on a facility condition assessment and master plan that identified roughly $70.9 million in deferred maintenance across county properties, with courts’ share estimated at $41.6 million.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},5983475,"County outlines PFAS cleanup plan at former fire training site, warns of multi‑million-dollar uncertainty",805,501000,1306000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5773900-0f125b8505545ac2aa113249a8f6645a&start=501&end=1306","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5773900-0f125b8505545ac2aa113249a8f6645a/thumbnail_501000.jpg","/articles/5983475/Barnstable-County/Massachusetts/County-outlines-PFAS-cleanup-plan-at-former-fire-training-site-warns-of-multimillion-dollar-uncertainty","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5983475-91c767f0ad94eee36f5f92c67d37000e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770908490&Signature=i4~SBosR~4zefbi-rDXZkKSEQBbxd4Xxk8RJY2qpJGdpB1nOfawrvzFLkzwkQ~YyLLni0ocOiNw~6QmCyiSOZO9U7TkWs3mBpElnAn5BhUt2HQpvY5tPFJjlj83Ev71UYmOVmb9My5yGUGPEAmewxG~wWRY2dd3hl4x9dPc3TQx0Q3A2gt6LL7PoEAKkdjruuskFMUmd2yWNqHDFViAcbI1HhldOC0JzrMpUyclICMZqr2wl4aJY7AScwqxosRymjCzx8o46h26a25CxtzJov0NzpYpWy82pQAXcyYO6OvBZ44TlB-rtnz1THvY8MHjcd76OvMIDrPw2ebtJwLFQZw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Paul Rosala, assets and infrastructure manager for Barnesville County, told the Assembly of Delegates standing committee on finance that the county is proceeding under the Massachusetts Contingency Plan to investigate and remediate PFAS contamination at a former municipal fire training site. \"We, being the property owner, are required to take on the remediation of the site,\" Rosala said, describing ongoing Phase 2 work, a groundwater model and ecological risk assessment that will be included in the Phase 2 report.

Rosala said consultant GZA has developed concentration maps and a groundwater model showing a plume moving southeast toward Mary Dunn Pond and identified links or separations between plumes originating on county property and nearby airport and municipal sources. \"We're looking to determine what is ours and what is others,\" he said, noting fingerprinting of PFAS compounds is being used to help distinguish multiple sources.

The county has also installed a permeable reactive barrier (PRB) under the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) immediate response action process. Rosala described the barrier as injected granular carbon that intercepts PFAS as groundwater flows through and reported a pilot test result: \"Water down gradient of the permeable reactive barrier is, you know, essentially non detect.\" Construction began in September and Rosala said the PRB installation was scheduled to wrap up by October.

Committee members pressed technical and funding questions. Delegate Doug O'Malley asked about the stability of PFAS binding to the carbon; Rosala said DEP had reviewed the design and that the injected carbon is similar to carbon used in drinking‑water treatment and that DEP found the approach appropriate for the site. Delegate Killian cautioned against experimental in‑ground chemical destruction of PFAS while the science remains emergent.

On costs and funding, Rosala said the county has tracked \"over $10,000,000\" in PFAS‑related expenditures to date and listed several ongoing items: settlement costs with the Mary Dunn wells, ongoing engineering and legal fees, a pump‑and‑treat system maintenance and a $2.5 million PRB construction contract. He said GZA is preparing life‑cycle costs and that a Phase 3 remediation evaluation, design and construction will follow Phase 2 work and public comment to DEP. Rosala gave a conservative remediation range of $10 million to $60 million but said the county is \"really hoping to be on a much lower side\" with engineering strategies.

Rosala and Assistant County Administrator Vera Harrick described current and prior sources of county funding. Rosala said early work has been financed internally and offset in part with ARPA funds. Harrick told the committee that $4 million was appropriated from ARPA and the assembly previously appropriated an additional $11 million to a PFAS special revenue fund; she said routine operations and maintenance have been paid from a special revenue fund rather than the general fund.

Rosala also said the county has an active property damages suit against a PFAS manufacturer and has sought congressional directed spending (a draft request for $3 million was described), but cautioned that those recoveries are uncertain and litigation is slow. He said the county is studying options including state revolving loans and additional external funding. Rosala emphasized human health and wildlife as the top priorities and said permanent solutions depend on evolving remediation technologies and regulatory review.

The committee did not take formal votes on PFAS work during the session. Members asked for follow‑up briefings from finance staff and for the project team to return with more refined lifecycle and budget figures as Phase 2 findings solidify.","Barnesville County staff updated the finance committee on a Phase 2 investigation of PFAS contamination at a former municipal fire training site, a pilot permeable reactive barrier installed this fall, and wide-ranging cost uncertainty tied to remediation, long‑term operations and potential litigation.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Finance committee asks administration for clearer accounting of grants and budget impacts under Resolution 25‑09

County proposes Superior Courthouse exterior restoration and launches facility master plan with $70.9M deferred needs

County outlines PFAS cleanup plan at former fire training site, warns of multi‑million-dollar uncertainty