The State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) convened on September 16, 2025, to address critical updates regarding water quality and water rights fees. The meeting focused on the adjustment of fee structures and stakeholder engagement, reflecting the board's commitment to transparency and collaboration.

The session began with a review of discrepancies in fee calculations for construction projects. Staff reported an error that affected approximately 134 projects, leading to an adjustment of the maximum fee from $11,223 to $11,311, which corresponds to a cap of 200 disturbed acres. This correction aims to ensure accurate fee assessments and maintain compliance with existing regulations.

Following this, public comments were received from various stakeholders, including representatives from multiple cities and water authorities. Bob Gore, speaking on behalf of several organizations, expressed gratitude for the board's efforts in conducting fee workshops and emphasized the importance of collaboration in enhancing water quality while managing costs. He highlighted the ongoing budget challenges faced by the state, noting a projected $20 billion deficit.

Rosario Cortez, representing WaterUSE California, acknowledged the board's outreach efforts and the adjustments made to the fee regulations, which were revised from earlier drafts. She emphasized the need for affordable fees to support water recycling programs while maintaining sufficient funding.

Spencer Sachs from the California Association of Sanitation Agencies echoed these sentiments, thanking the board for its engagement and support in keeping fees reasonable by utilizing fund reserves.

The board then moved to discuss water rights fees, with no proposed increases for the current year. Staff outlined updates aimed at improving clarity in fee assessments and proposed a temporary suspension of Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) fees for projects experiencing delays. This proposal specifically addresses the San Vicente Energy Storage Facility, which has faced funding challenges and prolonged development timelines.

Nina Kuzmic from the San Diego County Water Authority supported the proposed suspension, highlighting the financial relief it would provide for projects with extended timeframes. She commended the board for its collaborative approach and responsiveness to stakeholder feedback.

The meeting concluded with a unanimous vote to adopt the revised fee structures, reflecting the board's commitment to addressing stakeholder concerns while ensuring the sustainability of water resources in California. The SWRCB plans to continue its dialogue with stakeholders to further enhance water management strategies in the future.