[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6470352,"mediaKeyId","5779690-851f5965586a7ee686c839295dbaaee4","parentId",5779690,"title","Commissioners reject proposal to cut commissioners' per diem, citing value of public service","audioSeconds",284,"startMs",1431000,"endMs",1715000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5779690-851f5965586a7ee686c839295dbaaee4&start=1431&end=1715","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5779690-851f5965586a7ee686c839295dbaaee4/thumbnail_1431000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6470352/Eaton-County/Michigan/Commissioners-reject-proposal-to-cut-commissioners-per-diem-citing-value-of-public-service","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6470352-2c6414c25ea87f5e21cbd63184404a54/orig.mp4?Expires=1770517711&Signature=A-94t0ROQH0sw9hm45mTE1jIvS-U0ujABtgK3pmOToMlTSr7t6ioi5qTFRRt80w6uhTzLmbqpf7wHvTLqMc3Lh24NZSATVvuPkUBdIgbUt1QTy2ghW~WPAa4qb1hXte6oAb12a-EbD2tNWqjlXIQfNVBgCFFq8iatNGJWIb0YmuxDNNq-dTJMkGxDmVa66GTMFVgI2friPgYK4GxCdGN3vAb-ZovubUhxAMoOgOh4ptkm~ulxEHQpDJDrIgwMeDYFAYM1F7WDH9T~fhGEnM3~VxEuePdJh1Tl2-uKa2jfpHq3Dg7L9QkukGsgwch8uR0NWt-2ormjeUO8olYzRtyzA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Eaton County","date","2025-09-18T11:24:48Z","article","A resolution to reduce meeting per diem and taxable millage compensation for Eaton County commissioners failed on a voice vote Sept. 17 after extended debate over whether cutting commissioner pay would help the county's finances.

Commissioner Drosha (moved) and Commissioner Barber (seconded) put the measure before the board. Several commissioners spoke against the proposal. Chairman Mott opposed the change, arguing it would send the wrong message about the value of the commissioners' work: \"If you value what you're doing, we're making pretty big decisions for the people that work here and for the people in this county,\" he said. \"It's not about the dollar figure.\"

Commissioner Holmes said the proposal had been raised by a constituent and the measure was intended to examine line items closely. Commissioner Haskell said he had reconsidered his earlier position and would oppose the resolution, describing individual choices not to claim per diem as voluntary and not a reason to cut compensation for others.

After discussion, the board voted by voice; the motion failed and was recorded in the minutes as not carried.

Why it mattered: Proponents framed the change as a step toward tighter fiscal discipline; opponents said the proposed cut would have minimal budgetary impact and could dissuade qualified candidates from serving.

Details
- Motion: reduce meeting per diem and taxable millage compensation for county commissioners. Moved by Commissioner Droshear; supported by Commissioner Barber.
- Outcome: motion failed (voice vote). No roll-call tally recorded in the transcript.
- Key arguments: supporters urged line-by-line scrutiny of the budget; opponents said the change would \"go in the wrong direction\" and emphasized the symbolic value of paying commissioners fairly.

Ending
The board left the commissioners' compensation structure unchanged at the meeting. Commissioners said they would continue reviewing the budget line by line in committee work.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","9-17-2025 Board of Commissioners","oneSentenceSummary","A resolution to reduce meeting per diem and taxable millage compensation for Eaton County commissioners failed after floor debate. Supporters said it addressed budget optics; opponents said reducing pay would devalue the office and not meaningfully affect the county budget.","taxTitle","Eaton County, Michigan","taxId",53092,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6470357,"Eaton County adopts 2025–26 budget and winter tax rates after contentious vote",788,1348000,2136000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5779690-851f5965586a7ee686c839295dbaaee4&start=1348&end=2136","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5779690-851f5965586a7ee686c839295dbaaee4/thumbnail_1348000.jpg","/articles/6470357/Eaton-County/Michigan/Eaton-County-adopts-202526-budget-and-winter-tax-rates-after-contentious-vote","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6470357-d3858add84f6a9c514f95b7bb28b3948/orig.mp4?Expires=1770517711&Signature=HMEhA~GlpPuEiNJKSlPjivHxeh83~LaAXn0kSOcFx2IaMxeMXWetqNbOI6gD4hTm0HJ1wJeGyZRwmJ3zVtFINNNH7c-ZwCKsp2i259tC168px~DjDPLbUEFx~N17ValloSosHjGJ6AKb4ZwCyHoJIS5JoXHvxbbwOYHoy0fyD3C76z~FG7Ozivirx3px6kOKT9eoCi7Ho53BE2OkP5NauBAL67~a~VjW~Rv2uqbeMOPAAPaJ6S64lrBDY5Eype55ZRH4kNqmvYxMtxV-Ido7qhmX0p2AMHkEmClsoJEqjWmFoBi7AVYMxSKkov2BuhHqclcOdt7e72XmOPJFqXKO-w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Eaton County commissioners on Sept. 17 adopted the county's 2025\u00131 budget and set winter tax rates, approving the measure by roll call after extended debate over program cuts and commissioner compensation.

The board voted 12\u00132 in favor of the budget, with Commissioners Peake and Toomey voting no. Commissioner Durocher moved the measure; Commissioner Arndt seconded. Chairman Mott declared the motion carried.

The budget vote followed weeks of staff work and public comment, and commissioners said they made difficult choices to keep the county solvent. Controller Connie Sobey told the board the administration had originally been authorized in 2023 to take certain actions and sought reaffirmation on some items now that the board makeup had changed. \"We wanted to reaffirm this resolution,\" Sobey said regarding participation in national opioid settlements, \"so that we're not missing any of those funds to serve our residents.\"

Why it matters: The adopted budget contains cuts to outside agencies and restores pay increases for county employees, part of a multi-year effort staff described as necessary to stabilize county finances. Commissioners and members of the public said some cuts were painful; county leaders said the choices were required to keep basic services and payroll intact.

Most important details
- Final vote: roll call showed 12 votes in favor, 2 opposed (Peake, Toomey). The board recorded the roll call on the floor before finalizing the motion.
- Commissioners flagged a previously discussed bipartisan proposal that had suggested cuts to several outside agencies; one speaker summarized that proposal as a 30% cut to CMH, 25% to Barry Eaton Health and 30% to MSU Extension during earlier budget deliberations.
- The board agreed to a procedural amendment later identified by staff: a $19,942 adjustment to the commissioners' compensation line would need to be processed to reflect earlier motions during the budget process.

Supporting details and related votes
Commissioners and staff framed the budget as the product of a long process that started in 2023. Several commissioners praised staff for long hours of work and said the budget was a necessary, if difficult, step.

Public remarks during the meeting highlighted both concerns and appreciation. A resident urged the board to remember constituents in the unrepresented District 1, saying the area covers about \"25%\" of the county and currently lacked representation until a November election. County employees and department leaders spoke in support of preserving staff and services; several employees publicly thanked the board for protecting positions.

Votes at a glance (actions taken on Sept. 17, 2025)
- Adopt 2025\u00131 Eaton County budget and winter tax rates. Moved by Commissioner Durocher; seconded by Commissioner Arndt. Outcome: approved by roll call (12 yes, 2 no). (See provenance: topicintro s=1739.45, topfinish s=2136.5)
- Resolution reaffirming Eaton County participation in national opioid settlement agreements. Seconded by Commissioner Holmes; outcome: approved. Controller Sobey said the action was a reaffirmation of prior authority to enter settlements so the county would not miss funds. (provenance: topicintro s=1178.88, topfinish s=1321.76)
- Resolution to amend resolution 25-3-36 authorizing a DNR trust fund application. Moved by Commissioner Droshear; outcome: approved. (provenance: topicintro s=1321.7599, topfinish s=1347.03)
- Resolution opposing proposed House fiscal year 2026 cuts to county revenue sharing. Moved by Commissioner Droshev; outcome: approved. County staff said preliminary estimates put the local loss at about $500,000 if the cut were applied as drafted. (provenance: topicintro s=1348.23, topfinish s=1427.96)
- Ways & Means package and associated personnel agreements: included approval of a Barry Eaton District Health Department technology contract; revisions to starting-salary parameters and educational requirements in sheriff's bargaining agreements; FY 2024\u001325 budget amendments; and a revision to the county purchasing policy to align capitalization thresholds with federal grant rules. All motions were moved and approved in committee and carried on the floor with voice votes. (provenance samples: topicintro s=971.535, topfinish s=1178.88)
- Public Safety: one-year extensions of the intensive detention reentry program agreement and the Westside Residential Alternative Program agreement with the Michigan Department of Corrections. Moved by Commissioner Holmes and carried. (provenance: topicintro s=911.915, topfinish s=953.35)
- Zoning map amendment (amend zoning ordinance map). Moved by Commissioner Barber; outcome: approved. (provenance: topicintro s=881.21497, topfinish s=900.81)
- Claims and purchases (pay bills). Moved by Commissioner Droshev; outcome: approved. (provenance: topicintro s=1719.01, topfinish s=1739.45)

Process notes and clarifications
- Formal roll-call results were recorded only on the final budget adoption; most other items passed by voice vote and were recorded on the meeting minutes as \"motion carries.\" Where the transcript did not record a vote tally, the minutes indicate the motion carried.
- The controller's office said it had previously been authorized to join opioid settlements in 2023 and asked the board to reaffirm that authority to avoid missing funds from newly available agreements.
- The board discussed and noted a $19,942 technical adjustment needed on the commissioners' compensation line because of a prior budget motion; staff said that change would be amended before finalizing related entries.

What happens next
Staff and department heads will begin implementing the adopted budget and the related contract renewals. Commissioners signaled they will continue oversight work and indicated further committee meetings will refine purchasing and personnel policy changes.

Ending
Commissioners closed the meeting by thanking staff and employees for work during the budget process; the board set its next regular meeting for Oct. 15, 2025.","The Eaton County Board of Commissioners approved the county's 2025\u00131 budget and winter tax rates on Sept. 17, passing the measure by roll call after weeks of debate over service cuts and employee pay. The board also approved a bundle of related resolutions, from opioid-settlement participation to several contract and policy updates.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commissioners reject proposal to cut commissioners' per diem, citing value of public service

Eaton County adopts 2025–26 budget and winter tax rates after contentious vote