[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6464043,"mediaKeyId","5784576-c3200d77dbd952ea0867b1c91a6f6183","parentId",5784576,"title","At a glance: council approves routine resolutions, takes up Habitat rezoning on first reading","audioSeconds",6654,"startMs",2295000,"endMs",8949000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5784576-c3200d77dbd952ea0867b1c91a6f6183&start=2295&end=8949","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5784576-c3200d77dbd952ea0867b1c91a6f6183/thumbnail_2295000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6464043/Gallatin-City/Sumner-County/Tennessee/At-a-glance-council-approves-routine-resolutions-takes-up-Habitat-rezoning-on-first-reading","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6464043-1cddc37befa1dd41aa9bbd1012dd8707/orig.mp4?Expires=1776553552&Signature=A1KzqoQwPzaJIAsKh85CnQkOvIAqPnB79~YJ6UNXoRCsPV7ZxbXYLb6ZPkqiTBMOYGRK~NNhX8xaXI4Q0ADSqWzS7J-Fx9dLep5CI6J6KXOuuPjOh1Q6AP9aONFiHuSTl4Zjcd5HRlo9xt2cy7YPBi2cGKXfXL8rUM4HMBzgQYeI76Erd8EUIRV9c9XKOGumpGchyi8PWC-XNo6vzH2Q-OLoqbcD5HPJPSLaCPgTsuQfb9bOGLqTCfbH9nZNrIc8z3hRdmhziggI1wDv8n-1Ff2zmnwCXYeyUzlNDi1tuAy6F9d4aqGosshpnNsj4W0AYrugZRtrsYHd~vFz39D8ZA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Gallatin City, TN","date","2025-09-17T15:16:06Z","article","The Gallatin City Council on Sept. 16 completed several routine items on its agenda and approved first reading of a Habitat for Humanity rezoning ordinance.

Key outcomes:
- Ordinance (first reading): Councilman Carter introduced Ordinance ORD‑02509‑48, a rezoning to allow a Habitat for Humanity residential community (Examer Court) on approximately 0.66 acres; the council approved the ordinance on first reading unanimously (recorded as 6‑0). The ordinance rezones the parcel from CS (Commercial Services) to MRO (Multiple Residential and Office) and authorizes staff to update the official zoning atlas.

- Resolution R2509‑56: The council unanimously accepted public improvements by the city in Kennesaw Farm Phase 6, Section 3.

- Resolution R2509‑57: The council unanimously authorized the mayor to sign a renewal service agreement with NeoGov/PowerDMS (a software vendor) for city services.

- Street closure: The council approved a temporary street‑closure application to close part of the public square for a vintage market on Oct. 18, 2025 (10 a.m.–3 p.m.).

Votes and procedure: The two resolutions and the street‑closure application passed by voice vote without extended debate. The Habitat for Humanity rezoning cleared first reading; council members and staff indicated the item will return for subsequent readings per standard ordinance procedure.

What this means: The routine actions place no immediate new obligations on the general fund; the Habitat rezoning now proceeds through the city's legislative process with additional readings before final adoption.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","9-16-25 Gallatin City Council Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","On Sept. 16 the Gallatin City Council approved several routine items — acceptance of public improvements in Kennesaw Farm Phase 6 Section 3, renewed a software service agreement and approved a temporary street closure — and took first reading of a Habitat for Humanity rezoning ordinance.","taxTitle","Gallatin City , Sumner County, Tennessee","taxId",52803,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6464046,"Gallatin council postpones ordinance to remove distance rule between retail liquor stores after hours of public comment",305,7415000,7720000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5784576-c3200d77dbd952ea0867b1c91a6f6183&start=7415&end=7720","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5784576-c3200d77dbd952ea0867b1c91a6f6183/thumbnail_7415000.jpg","/articles/6464046/Gallatin-City/Sumner-County/Tennessee/Gallatin-council-postpones-ordinance-to-remove-distance-rule-between-retail-liquor-stores-after-hours-of-public-comment","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6464046-8674da8dcee7afa5d819166c9c113636/orig.mp4?Expires=1776553552&Signature=Nwkr19py8Nij2XhpBZKz19fQsD4r7mYbA7p~ylBrrsaHTLVRYVVp--m0Jl9APpmG2LMpqe-Zw7MtPuuGxir23BnJR1rFRwE-NCjHVmnPmHe0o3YVWSVa7LhcwLHSQbZr3OUadc2q-P7Ht4rHg4QYXN3AOR7pzL54zuZbKoMmT~XknrVZQ7DwQydjTVLpGg5~xsLqV2jXai73IbdVzYw9O7OwgdYIil93oKDnbDd~H6q5kv2OYfIp0Ix5anRcvP8FNV9zw6gsF7aogP-J07CQ5F3Q~Yvvkg7atBAKNNCD~wXzW80~DYwTOg7ekhdrIj8TiMEeM1cB~NQfxZHI5VTTMg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Gallatin City Council on Sept. 16 considered a proposed ordinance to amend section 3‑55 of the Gallatin Municipal Code to delete the distance requirement between existing and approved retail liquor stores. The ordinance was the subject of extended public testimony and council discussion; ultimately the measure was postponed indefinitely.

Councilman Alexander moved to defer consideration to a future work session to allow more study; that motion was later withdrawn and a motion to postpone the ordinance indefinitely was made and seconded. The council voted to postpone the ordinance indefinitely.

Public comment at length divided along neighborhood and business lines. Dozens of residents — including Margaret Tyson of Saint Luke AME Church and Sean Cook, senior pastor of Key Stewart Church — urged the council to retain the one‑mile spacing requirement and argued reducing it would concentrate alcohol outlets near schools, churches and neighborhoods. “Moving liquor stores closer to our schools and churches sends the wrong message to the next generation,” pastor Sean Cook said, adding, “If we must consider distance requirements, then let us strengthen them, not weaken them.”

Others, including several retail business owners and a former Tennessee Alcoholic Beverage Commission executive, urged a reduced spacing or a population‑based approach. Tom Weeks (Danielle Elks in transcript is the alcohol attorney) and other speakers said many Tennessee cities use shorter distances (e.g., 600 feet), and attorney Danielle Elks told the council that “a mile is probably the highest that I’ve seen across the state” and that a reduction could generate city tax revenue. Several commenters said the city’s earlier change two years ago — which lifted a cap on the number of licenses — had not yet shown its full effect and urged caution.

Council debate ranged from regulatory complexity to fairness for existing license holders. Some council members said they had learned more about the regulatory framework and state tax rules since earlier action and expressed concern about singling out a single applicant or parcel. Councilman Fan, who has experience selling alcohol in the community, argued for tying availability to population and demographic factors, noting on‑street drinking and transit concerns in areas lacking vehicle access.

After discussion, Councilman Chuvance moved to postpone the ordinance indefinitely; Councilman Alexander seconded. The council approved the motion and took no further action on the ordinance that evening.

What changed: The council had earlier amended the proposed ordinance during prior meetings; at this session members expressed a desire for more study and warned that a piecemeal change tied to a single applicant could create legal or political problems. The Planning Department and city staff will be expected to provide analysis if the council takes the matter up again.","After hours of public comment for and against shrinking or removing the city’s one‑mile spacing requirement between retail liquor stores, the council moved to postpone action indefinitely on the amendment to Section 3‑55 of the Gallatin code.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6464049,"Gallatin council holds public hearing on Foxland Harbor marina amid dispute over Corps lease, dredging, traffic and rentals",1881,4003000,5884000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5784576-c3200d77dbd952ea0867b1c91a6f6183&start=4003&end=5884","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5784576-c3200d77dbd952ea0867b1c91a6f6183/thumbnail_4003000.jpg","/articles/6464049/Gallatin-City/Sumner-County/Tennessee/Gallatin-council-holds-public-hearing-on-Foxland-Harbor-marina-amid-dispute-over-Corps-lease-dredging-traffic-and-rentals","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6464049-e4983a2447a10eef21f5f20e5c78ddb8/orig.mp4?Expires=1776553552&Signature=Vf3YbphqzB3zkGE60gGr8d15xKknaA0sP9CmbMPNoPu~blAGuMu-lVSg5e3qPWa1o0pmADYdTPsOIR8zXndAzljKg4lbkjNz~1mH3gDxzQZxTHn-GDDzMGFDrdusdcSfx4y8PciFmlr285nuFXEYOwfxIZNhLf~TzHuuNc99hmHCUgDYV0VXzJ0BaQeezSqd3ubh03m564nZOnqVEjN~QHduYdw9-mjG0t3r1B2AneftlJsGyVImQRvC0Vco~u3HS8QHJLBTQcRAEXo0shkAjdENSK~~IGIu9FDIYAREr2Cyoyg-tuKo-Ol330vP6Oa41tyT4tUUbaL0TZTvu0C1Hg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Gallatin City Council on Sept. 16 held a public hearing on an ordinance to approve an amended preliminary master development plan for Foxland Harbor Marina, a mixed marina-and-residential project on Old Hickory Lake. Councilman Carter introduced the ordinance and declared the hearing open; the hearing concluded the same night with no final vote.

Supporters and opponents filled the council chamber and spoke at length. Tom Lee, an attorney for Friends of Old Hickory Lake, told the council he and his group had obtained a March 6, 2025 Department of the Army lease for commercial concession purposes between the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the marina developer, Foxland Harbor Marina LLC. Lee said the lease requires the developer to follow a five‑phase “use and development plan,” limits the lease term to 25 years (extendable twice), gives the Corps written approval authority over development-plan changes and permits the Corps to review and, if necessary, set concession prices. “This is a lease for commercial concession purposes,” Lee said, and “the Corps is a present landlord” whose written approval is required before structures are erected.

Lee warned the lease and the plan the Corps approved differ in material ways from the plan before the council: the Corps’ exhibit describes phased construction with infrastructure and 186 wet slips, parking and fuel facilities in phase 1, and other land‑based elements later. By contrast, the city’s plan presented to the council does not phase boat-slip construction, omits certain land uses in the Corps plan and does not include the Corps’ sign and architectural restrictions. Lee pointed to a clause in the lease that says the lessee “will not subdivide or develop into private residential development” and cited federal regulations (36 C.F.R. § 327.22) that prohibit occupying Corps lands for private residence without written permission from the district commander.

Developer and project representatives disputed some characterizations and emphasized changes made during the review process. Joe Godfrey of Godfrey Development Group, who said he has worked on Foxland since 2007, described the marina and associated condos as part of a long‑planned master development for the Foxland neighborhood and said the current proposal is roughly half the density that could be built under prior approvals (112 condo units vs. earlier higher counts). “This whole thing has been being built out with the anticipation of the condo and marina project,” Godfrey said, and he urged the council to allow the project to proceed as part of that long‑standing plan.

Neighbors and other residents described a list of concerns the council will consider before any zoning approval. David Shearer, a nearby resident, read email guidance from Planning Director Rose concluding short‑term rentals are permitted in the MRO zoning district unless the zoning ordinance as a whole is changed; the director noted the city could not single out this development to ban short‑term rentals without changing the ordinance generally. Several speakers asked whether the project’s homeowners association (HOA) could restrict rentals privately.

Environmental and safety concerns drew repeated testimony. Tim Weeks, who spoke on behalf of the Sierra Club Middle Tennessee and as a neighborhood resident, said “the developer is telling you that there’s not going to be any dredging” but called that statement “flat out a lie,” saying near‑shore depths are shallow and dredging will be required to accommodate larger boats. Multiple residents said they had run aground in the inlet and described shallow areas near proposed slips. Speakers also questioned the plan’s traffic mitigation triggers — the city’s traffic improvements are set to occur when 25% of the project is built, which some residents said would allow a marina to operate without needed roadway changes. David Shearer and other speakers urged the council to require traffic improvements when 25% of boat slips are installed rather than when 25% of the entire project is complete.

Other concerns raised during public comment included: the effect of wake boats and increased boat traffic on shoreline erosion and noise; the potential for pump‑out, sewer and fuel facilities to cause pollution or odors; the loss of public access to existing boat ramps; parking and outdoor storage of boat trailers; and whether the Corps’ lease would allow proposed condos or short‑term residential uses on Corps lands. Dominic Wade, a local business owner, cautioned that more liquor‑store or short‑term rental activity could change neighborhood character. Supporters of the project, including Valerie Elder and residents who identified themselves as buyers or supporters of Foxland development, said the marina would bring recreation, restaurants and economic activity to Gallatin and argued the developer has a long record in the area.

Planning and permitting questions also surfaced. Several people noted that an earlier planning commission action removed elements such as a dry‑storage building and a hotel from the submitted plan. Residents and the developer disagreed about whether an 87‑foot building height exception had previously been authorized; Planning Director Rose told a resident that the height exception before the council is an exception to the code that requires council action. The council was also urged to clarify whether boat‑trailer storage would be restricted across the site or only in certain visible locations.

The public hearing closed after extended testimony; Mayor Brown (presiding) did not put the matter to a final vote that night. The ordinance remains pending. Council members signaled they will consider the lease provisions, the Corps’ role and the city planning record before taking a final vote when the rezoning returns to the council.

What’s next: The council will take the ordinance through its standard legislative process; a date for final action was not taken at the meeting. The Corps lease and the differences between the Corps’ five‑phase plan and the city plan were central themes of Wednesday’s hearing and will be among materials council members review during deliberations.","A packed public hearing on the proposed Foxland Harbor marina drew hours of testimony Wednesday as residents, environmental advocates and the developer clashed over a Corps of Engineers lease, dredging needs, traffic safety and whether short‑term rentals would be allowed under the zoning change.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

At a glance: council approves routine resolutions, takes up Habitat rezoning on first reading

Gallatin council postpones ordinance to remove distance rule between retail liquor stores after hours of public comment

Gallatin council holds public hearing on Foxland Harbor marina amid dispute over Corps lease, dredging, traffic and rentals