Board Discusses Policy Updates on Safety, Discipline, and Student Health Services

September 18, 2025 | Higley Unified School District (4248), School Districts, Arizona


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board Discusses Policy Updates on Safety, Discipline, and Student Health Services
The Higley Unified School District (HUSD) Governing Board convened on September 16, 2025, to discuss several key policy changes during their first reading. The meeting focused on updates to safety and disciplinary policies, reflecting recent legislative changes and recommendations from the Arizona School Boards Association (ASBA).

Mr. Lotzenheiser introduced the first policy under review, known as EB, which pertains to the environmental and safety program. He highlighted that the proposed changes include updated language defining expectations for school safety programs and personnel. Notably, the policy now incorporates provisions for utilizing state funds to support School Resource Officers (SROs) and School Safety Officers (SSOs) on campuses. If these personnel are unavailable, the funds can be redirected to acquire alternative safety measures. Additionally, the policy outlines requirements for maintaining an emergency operations plan, which has been revised for the 2025-2026 school year.

Following this, Ms. Johnson presented the second policy, GCQF, which addresses the discipline, suspension, and dismissal of professional staff members. The primary update involves the inclusion of language that allows the district to obtain information from the State Board of Education regarding employees who may be under investigation or facing disciplinary actions. This change aims to enhance the district's ability to make informed hiring decisions.

During the discussion, a board member raised a concern regarding the policy's provision that allows for "no action" as a possible consequence for misconduct. The member questioned the rationale behind this clause, suggesting that any misconduct should warrant some form of response, whether it be coaching or disciplinary action.

The board plans to revisit these policies for a second reading and potential action at their next meeting, indicating a commitment to ensuring the safety and integrity of the district's educational environment.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Arizona articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI