County Board Denies Variance Request for Flood Violation at 22 Lake Drive

September 20, 2025 | Chatham County, Georgia


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

County Board Denies Variance Request for Flood Violation at 22 Lake Drive
During the Chatham County Commission meeting on September 19, 2025, significant budget amendments and a contentious variance request dominated discussions, highlighting the ongoing challenges of property compliance and community safety.

The meeting opened with a proposal to amend the fiscal year 2025 budget, which included a $12.5 million transfer from the general fund to the capital improvement program. This funding aims to enhance community infrastructure, with specific allocations of $4 million for the Highway 17 safety project and $5 million for a new gymnasium. Additionally, the budget adjustments included various grants aimed at supporting local services, such as a $5,000 increase for the Rodney Roderick Fund and $88,211 for the Georgia Department of Family and Children Services.

However, the most heated discussion arose from a variance request concerning a property at 22 Lake Drive. The applicant, represented by Mike Vakwer, sought approval to retain unpermitted modifications made to the property, which were discovered to violate the county's flood damage prevention ordinance. The property owners, unaware of a nonconversion clause that restricted modifications, faced potential costs of $200,000 to restore compliance. Staff recommended denial of the variance, emphasizing the importance of adhering to local regulations to maintain the integrity of floodplain management and protect existing insurance policies for residents.

Commissioners expressed concerns about the implications of granting the variance, particularly in light of increasing complaints regarding short-term rentals and unpermitted modifications in the area. The commission ultimately voted to deny the request, reinforcing the need for strict enforcement of existing ordinances to safeguard community standards and prevent future violations.

In conclusion, the meeting underscored the commission's commitment to fiscal responsibility and regulatory compliance, as they navigate the complexities of property management and community safety in Chatham County. As discussions continue around short-term rentals and property regulations, residents can expect further actions aimed at enhancing oversight and addressing community concerns.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Georgia articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI