[{"_1":2,"_88":-5,"_89":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",6586935,"mediaKeyId","5795615-ade2798a5d0eddf86c236e2e9bcfb2ef","parentId",5795615,"title","Los Alamos board hears artificial-turf feasibility study; asks staff to submit comments to Parks & Rec by Oct. 2","audioSeconds",1382,"startMs",1893945,"endMs",3276140,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5795615-ade2798a5d0eddf86c236e2e9bcfb2ef&start=1893&end=3276","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5795615-ade2798a5d0eddf86c236e2e9bcfb2ef/thumbnail_1893945.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6586935/New-Mexico/Los-Alamos-board-hears-artificial-turf-feasibility-study-asks-staff-to-submit-comments-to-Parks-Rec-by-Oct-2","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6586935-787a5f235077c8e04ea88bccffcbe18f/orig.mp4?Expires=1771067414&Signature=fh9H9A12Srdgy6XBtrQYDI5iVsv5ttH~DEjO3hf8b9NqeSTi0i8f3FZMia9msFfIu~eIRou74Ndus62QKNCb72GmlmNcRlfi8xSMOIwnUxbymzfuvFWrH65SJzZ15jv5hon1HofsoCVb3HzJtSbYmfxhUEAr40QCvdQs1adh2whTrsoVCAQkGHPResc2MLnNj6XRIU3q9QWE8Y0khH6uA7VIHTeO1TywIW4j9oN59M~9N2bANnerUPJp2mczbNzi0FD1TKSPVwTteSN8ZuPTshGmato06Mf2IUaEHHl7XTKNN77IMDLD62DEUAfgHQWHeW1UGH04EypupSOtg9CYwg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Los Alamos County","date","2025-09-18T00:00:00Z","article","Consultants presented a feasibility study on artificial turf for two Los Alamos County facilities and the Environmental Sustainability Board authorized staff to collect and submit the board’s comments to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board by Oct. 2.

The consultant team summarized the study’s scope and community outreach. “The study was commissioned due to increasing demand for high quality multi use athletic fields capable of supporting a growing number of teams, leagues, and year round programming at North Mesa Sports Complex and Overlook Park,” said Lisa Gavioli, project manager with the consultant team. The consultants emphasized that the report is guidance, not a county commitment to install turf.

The report said the team held five public meetings, focused interviews with Los Alamos Public Schools athletes and coaches and the Los Alamos youth soccer league, a community survey that received more than 200 responses and a follow-up feedback survey with over 140 responses. The consultants identified benefits cited by many respondents—longer playable seasons, more consistent surfaces for high-school teams, and tournament opportunities—and concerns including higher surface temperatures in summer, potential abrasions and infections, presence of PFAS (so-called “forever chemicals”), microplastic shedding, and end-of-life disposal.

Consultants recommended a cautious, site-by-site approach rather than replacing all natural turf. Their conceptual framework proposes considering synthetic turf for specific playing fields (the study noted Lou Caviglia and Bomber Field at North Mesa as candidates and identified Hope Field, Xlavato and Dara Jones field considerations at Overlook Park), offering a mix of artificial and natural fields, and pairing turf decisions with site reconfiguration to reduce pedestrian/vehicle conflicts and add amenities. The team recommended product selection guided by recognized environmental standards and life-cycle considerations—referencing cradle-to-cradle certified options and the latest third-party health and environmental research.

The presentation addressed maintenance, phasing and costs. The consultants said cost estimates are broken into phases so the county could prioritize elements in manageable funding chunks; early planning assumed phased packages in the multi‑million-dollar range so jurisdictions could pursue funding and construction over several years. On maintenance trade-offs, the report noted synthetic turf supports more hours of use and needs less irrigation and no pesticides, while natural turf demands resting time, irrigation, pesticides and ongoing sod replacement in high‑use areas.

Board members asked for clarification on disinfection, heat and recyclability. Todd Smith, the study civil engineer, said disinfecting turf is rarely done in the dry, sunny Rocky Mountain climate: “Almost nobody does it in the Rocky Mountain region in the arid West because...whatever it was that might be there died right away.” On recyclability and chemicals, consultants said modern products have reduced levels of concerning chemicals compared with older systems and that some manufacturers now market recyclable or cradle‑to‑cradle certified systems, but public speakers urged caution about industry claims.

Resident Dina Pessenson spoke during public comment raising health and end‑of‑life concerns: “It’s not fair to say it’s recyclable on Cradle to Cradle when we know we can’t recycle half the stuff we’re collecting, and we can’t afford to recycle it,” she said, urging more local evidence of successful recycling and integrated pest management before decisions are made.

After questions and discussion the board took a procedural vote. The Environmental Sustainability Board moved to “authorize Chair Blair and staff liaison Angelica Gurule to collect comments from the Environmental Sustainability Board and submit them to the Parks and Rec Board no later than 10/02/2025.” The motion passed by voice vote; no roll-call tally was recorded in the transcript.

The consultants said next steps include incorporating board feedback, returning to Parks and Rec on Oct. 9, and presenting a final report for consideration in October. The board asked staff to collect member comments by Sept. 30 so comments could be compiled and delivered for the Oct. 2 deadline.

Notes and clarifications: the study team repeatedly emphasized they reviewed only North Mesa and Overlook Park, not all county fields; they recommended retaining many natural turf fields and evaluating specific fields for synthetic turf as part of a broader master‑planning process. The report includes a “myths and facts” appendix and cited third‑party research on PFAS, microplastics, infection risk, and recyclability (resources listed in the report’s Appendix G).","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Los Alamos County - Environmental Sustainability Board on 2025-09-18 5:30 PM","oneSentenceSummary","Consultants presented a feasibility study on artificial turf for two Los Alamos County facilities and the Environmental Sustainability Board authorized staff to collect and submit the board’s comments to the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board by Oct. 2.","taxTitle","Los Alamos, New Mexico","taxId",51137,"location","New Mexico","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},6586931,"Environmental Sustainability Board approves annual update to County Council, sets presentation for Oct. 21",7,4972885,4979993,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5795615-ade2798a5d0eddf86c236e2e9bcfb2ef&start=4972&end=4979","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5795615-ade2798a5d0eddf86c236e2e9bcfb2ef/thumbnail_4972885.jpg","/articles/6586931/New-Mexico/Environmental-Sustainability-Board-approves-annual-update-to-County-Council-sets-presentation-for-Oct-21","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6586931-ac775ee9ec522e4f9ef0223b6d19e178/orig.mp4?Expires=1771067414&Signature=NjXg014ZeZOUP5I04bWVLFrmPxl7F0po13KajdJpL3Nkdrgp1VhelCaLGYEbtiCU34MX0lRsJo~ir0xgnFTaKqgW9OBb~39vXn60llahXL4oeZZw1PEObXXfFx~s54SpaeWhqCrSSnW4c7ReCW1yOBsil0OgMfR8u4daVwRdFtVleskCQqw41kWwNqg~2kSv~aiKDdsukUcB3kw48uVf83E1W8np7yaQ6LZnKABFmlZdDipTEppTArpdgOAj1X9n0vKfQ3WiUqmk7c3982ZWQKGXZsKYrgO9IrF4G3a-xuf8-n7GzxFremaDV1hR32bxOoLmrFwGDzhby~DzIOJ6Aw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Environmental Sustainability Board approved its annual update to County Council and authorized Chair Shannon Blair and staff liaison Angelica Gurule to make final edits before the presentation scheduled for Oct. 21.

At the Sept. 18 meeting board members reviewed the draft annual update, discussed edits and priorities, and voted to approve the packet for submission to council with final changes allowed by the chair and staff. The motion to approve the update and authorize final edits passed by voice vote; the transcript records no roll‑call tally.

Board discussion focused on streamlining the presentation slides, clarifying who serves on various subcommittees, and emphasizing priorities for the coming year. Members suggested shortening bullet text for the council presentation, listing priorities rather than long ongoing lists and adding coordination with the Board of Public Utilities and the Department of Public Utilities on climate-related work. The board also discussed removing or rewording items that do not reflect active ESB work.

Several specific workstreams were highlighted for council: the plastic bag working group and an informal recycling survey, a communitywide EV charging study (consultant presentation due in October), education and outreach planning (a vendor has been selected and will present a curriculum aligned with the county’s Climate Action Plan), and municipal food‑composting planning (pending permitting and operational questions at the county Eco Station).

Board members raised implementation challenges, including uncertainty in the federal and state funding environment that could change the capital stack for projects and affect grant eligibility and timelines. The draft update will note that changing funding and program rules at higher levels may affect project pacing and the county’s approach to grants and implementation.

On the plastic bag item, the board discussed an informal recycling survey and an outstanding need for a formal waste audit; county staff said a comprehensive audit may not occur before Thanksgiving. Staff also reported a 17% contamination rate in the county’s recycling stream and provided disposal cost data; the board agreed to include a progress update on the plastic bag working group in its council presentation and to incorporate additional findings as they become available.

Other items mentioned for the council slide deck included sustainability alliance activity, the LAHS youth climate summit, recent presentations (bicycle working group), and outreach events such as Clean Up Los Alamos Day. The board will present the approved update to County Council on Oct. 21 in White Rock. Chair Blair and the staff liaison were authorized to make final edits and prepare the presentation materials.

The board also approved an earlier procedural motion to authorize the chair and staff to collect comments on the artificial turf feasibility study and forward those comments to Parks & Rec by Oct. 2; that item will be handled separately from the annual update presentation.

The ESB asked members to submit any final edits to staff by Sept. 30 so materials can be consolidated before the council packet is finalized.","The Environmental Sustainability Board approved its annual update to County Council and authorized Chair Shannon Blair and staff liaison Angelica Gurule to finalize edits. The board discussed priorities including the plastic bag working group, EV study, education outreach, and challenges from changing federal and state funding landscapes.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Los Alamos board hears artificial-turf feasibility study; asks staff to submit comments to Parks & Rec by Oct. 2

Environmental Sustainability Board approves annual update to County Council, sets presentation for Oct. 21