[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6462649,"mediaKeyId","5798431-d8faacc1d7facf9d7dbbfa70c5816a08","parentId",5798431,"title","Resident urges enforcement of 20‑foot no‑parking rule near crosswalks; commission points to city engineer and city manager","audioSeconds",235,"startMs",661000,"endMs",896000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5798431-d8faacc1d7facf9d7dbbfa70c5816a08&start=661&end=896","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5798431-d8faacc1d7facf9d7dbbfa70c5816a08/thumbnail_661000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6462649/Humboldt-County/California/Resident-urges-enforcement-of-20foot-noparking-rule-near-crosswalks-commission-points-to-city-engineer-and-city-manager","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6462649-e10f32622a8fdce3209a1478c2e07d26/orig.mp4?Expires=1775067972&Signature=BGSfAslELxHEfCRZlksTIjfTmOoPBhSb6nY618TM5p04sKnukYSQa8dooXUixImEBNoP7ci64q5~woypXJrEvsUApcmg4dB5DBQCtfH~02PVbZX6Ugp7Bm1q1GtZ6MsEam~yi8WgXCnFN9TeSPcytXsOMAcKgur9zjPTwGILAXBL6JIpjemhC9vT8yn2eC6I5p0iTCUkMtHXpouG8Qk090GgtoCxKCTyRog5gwGifgRRfpmvkCunphKCvliQwe94nVhx7fR2svpiSZDJgDT8ZYltPOMrWRlfiZZwNoyAS8m2JHgd3EF6N85EXdu0Bnf~SeO3SORBJt2ocTiSb0Sgrg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Access Humboldt","date","2025-09-18T15:26:51Z","article","A resident raised a parking and public‑safety concern during the meeting’s “items from the floor” portion, citing a section of the California Vehicle Code that the speaker summarized as prohibiting vehicles from parking within 20 feet of the vehicle‑approach side of a crosswalk. The speaker said visibility at the Parker and Trinity Street intersection is impaired in the morning because parked vehicles reduce sight distance for drivers and school traffic.

Commissioners and staff said enforcement and curb painting are operational matters for the city engineer and public works. Participants noted that curb‑painting decisions carry potential Coastal Commission requirements in some places, and suggested the interim city manager or city engineer (Gabe was referenced) as the logical first contacts on enforcement, inventory of red curbs and for any curb‑painting program.

No formal motion or ordinance was proposed at the meeting. The resident’s request was recorded as an item for staff follow‑up and potential coordination with the city engineer and interim city manager.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Trinidad Planning Commission 09/17/25 (Live Stream)","oneSentenceSummary","A resident asked the Trinidad Planning Commission on Sept. 17 to enforce a California Vehicle Code restriction that bars parking within 20 feet of crosswalk approaches, saying parked vehicles at Parker and Trinity streets reduce sight distance for school traffic.","taxTitle","Humboldt County, California","taxId",12695,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6462653,"Commissioners ask to cite local EOC, clarify CERT and mutual‑aid roles in safety element",767,5309000,6076000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5798431-d8faacc1d7facf9d7dbbfa70c5816a08&start=5309&end=6076","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5798431-d8faacc1d7facf9d7dbbfa70c5816a08/thumbnail_5309000.jpg","/articles/6462653/Humboldt-County/California/Commissioners-ask-to-cite-local-EOC-clarify-CERT-and-mutualaid-roles-in-safety-element","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6462653-28b4f5057ec3edbcad0fb553f5f4bec2/orig.mp4?Expires=1775067972&Signature=c0S4~E4kOOij3ByhdM-uHZd91nu8kw4Wusf6feWr~twdQcO3Q5dAdKPY0GRskxyq1ffsNELEd-bDhG2zSe5fEEXtBnE8E5Cu0leOqVjMC9uROTAEPze0dl0BvlGvTW7xbMs6inm1iJDlKGlnn2H3vMtNJQ0198U6qETPyXdEWSHvvtzziVwOP~3wGFeoIuSkuHvvCvmuZINh7401j1-eXFWgGri1e-qfQrK8WRmQtujfhxb-1k-PjD-jO5aLkH~RwDX-6LYgg6S3KR7Ak0XJLUwrDZ9Uoqj4Z7ZQRgyU2mq3ePPmVyt0GZWhXusZmlN850iN9cazio5DgzlvVGoc2A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Trinidad Planning Commission members reviewed the draft emergency response section of the city’s safety element during the Sept. 17 meeting and told staff to make local capacities and limitations clearer in the text.

The presenter said the emergency response chapter had not been previously included because it is not part of the city’s Local Coastal Program (LCP) and therefore not funded under the LCP grant. Commissioners nonetheless asked that the draft explicitly reference Trinidad’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) and the city’s emergency operations plan, and asked staff to note that the county may not activate its EOC for localized incidents.

The commission focused on practical clarity about response roles and expectations. Commissioners asked the draft to state that mutual‑aid agreements exist but that local response capacity can be limited if key staff live outside Trinidad or if volunteers are unavailable. In the discussion, several participants emphasized that volunteer groups such as CERT are a community resource and a “bridge” to professional responders, but are not a replacement for law enforcement, fire or search‑and‑rescue operations. The meeting record contains an unattributed statement summarized by commissioners: “They do not replace law enforcement. They do not replace fire. They do not replace search and rescue. And it is all volunteer.” The commission also asked the draft to make clear any city sponsorship, financial or logistical support for the Greater Trinidad CERT team.

Other requests included clearer wording around evacuation corridors and ingress/egress limits, a reference to the Humboldt County hazard mitigation plan annex for Trinidad, and a recommendation to keep the emergency text “evergreen” so that operational details can be updated separately from the policy document.

Commissioners and staff also discussed notification systems (email/text and the city website distribution list), and urged that the document note which alerts come from local sources versus third‑party feeds (for example, USGS earthquake or tsunami alerts).

No formal action was taken; commissioners asked staff to revise the section to reference the local EOC and emergency plan, to explain mutual‑aid and EOC roles for localized versus regional events, and to clarify the city’s current support for volunteer emergency teams.","The commission reviewed the draft emergency response section of the safety element and asked staff to reference the city’s emergency operations center and emergency plan, clarify mutual‑aid arrangements and make clear that CERT and volunteer groups supplement but do not replace professional responders.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6462658,"Trinidad Planning Commission pushes for clearer noise data, debates labeling of ‘tourist’ noise in draft noise element",4254,906000,5160000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5798431-d8faacc1d7facf9d7dbbfa70c5816a08&start=906&end=5160","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5798431-d8faacc1d7facf9d7dbbfa70c5816a08/thumbnail_906000.jpg","/articles/6462658/Humboldt-County/California/Trinidad-Planning-Commission-pushes-for-clearer-noise-data-debates-labeling-of-tourist-noise-in-draft-noise-element","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6462658-27e6df551290c2eca2c64eea01bc80d1/orig.mp4?Expires=1775067972&Signature=JNyQ757LTdj5XHgsGVnatqlkoYjSTUpT9D9dOZTHEoHeY26nRNJSaEIld~pCCHiVB1NAuyEhEgpDLoBuEjdJ35e9eimpkO7XBUyEM~YOR9mBf06W3~CxlphoLyj7sZXgk4qSqHamev-j5nPoPdhrQ9RPGh4m12j5MROXR~CMx1oYDnOHKNDM7k9EHAUuyZdc9EdFLxMoDnEnLx~NMzmE6gtmJ-1JFYSy1oiaoiS~ocsvTiswLgNXLoiVvKh0IQOzjUEE6hUS0yw3u0xIaTn6hpqbQY2W3OkCskCDAP28LChmhQ2~Rm-wljhrjSAanVlV7e~2ff7MjyzMx9Bd~Li0~w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Trinidad Planning Commission on Wednesday, Sept. 17 discussed revisions to the draft noise element of the city’s safety element, pressing staff for better baseline data and clearer categories for sources of sound.

Commissioners and attendees said the current noise readings are too limited to support numeric standards or an ordinance and urged staff to recast some categories (for example, reclassifying some “tourist” noise as vehicle or recreation noise) and to clarify when state or Coastal Commission rules would apply. Trevor, planning staff, told the commission “it’s not gonna be part of the local coastal program,” and said the noise section was included for completeness but required more work before being used to set local policy.

The discussion matters because the noise element informs Coastal Development Permit (CDP) review, building insulation requirements for funded housing and future noise regulation. Commissioners noted the element also feeds subsequent ordinances the city could adopt to manage daytime nuisances, construction noise and special events.

Most commissioners and commenters focused on three core concerns: the quality and timing of the sound measurements in the packet, the metrics the draft uses to judge compatibility, and the draft’s treatment of certain sources.

On data quality, multiple participants said the existing readings are an incomplete snapshot. The packet notes measurements taken on two short occasions (reported in the meeting as roughly 04:59–05:43 p.m. and 06:22–06:47 p.m.), and several commissioners called that “not representative” for a community with widely varying conditions. One commissioner said 24‑hour monitoring is often needed for reliable averages; another suggested either removing the table until there is better data or adding a clear map and time/context descriptions for each sample point.

Commissioners discussed the technical metrics cited in the draft: A-weighted decibels (dBA) and CNEL-style daily averages were mentioned repeatedly, along with compatibility thresholds used in model documents (examples cited in the meeting included daytime compatibility up to about 65 dB for outdoor sports, conditional acceptance up to 80 dB, and a frequently referenced interior target near 45 dB for housing). Commissioners also repeated points from the draft: a 3-dB change is often described as a just-noticeable difference and 5 dB as a commonly used threshold for a perceptible change in community response.

Several commissioners urged recategorizing “tourist” noise. Multiple speakers said most tourist-related complaints are vehicle-related (cars traveling to and from the coast or short-term rentals), not a distinct class of noise, and suggested the document label those sources by mechanism — e.g., “vehicle traffic” or “recreation activity” — rather than by visitor type. Commissioners contrasted that expected community noise (school playgrounds, public recreation and routine events) with industrial or avoidable commercial nuisances that might warrant enforcement.

The commission also discussed practical enforcement issues: a public comment flagged California Vehicle Code parking rules, and staff and commissioners noted red-curb painting can require a Coastal Development Permit in some situations. Staff recommended beginning the enforcement/curb‑marking conversation with the interim city manager and the city engineer.

No ordinance was adopted or voted on. Commissioners asked staff to refine the element, add context about sampling methods and locations, reconsider the categorization of noise sources (including treating many tourist activities as recreation or vehicle noise), and indicate when a site‑specific noise study would be required for development review.

\"The data in this packet is informative but not representative,\" one commissioner said during the discussion. In public comment, Paula, a resident, thanked the commission for the work and noted that outlying areas and the spheres of influence include different noise sources such as chainsaws and wood lots that the plan should consider.

Staff said it would rework the element and return with a draft that either includes a more robust sampling plan or removes the limited table and instead explains its limitations and proposed next steps.","Commissioners and residents spent the bulk of the Sept. 17 meeting reviewing the draft noise element of Trinidad’s safety element, questioning the representativeness of the existing sound readings, the labeling of tourists as a distinct noise source and whether the city should pursue an ordinance or additional monitoring.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Resident urges enforcement of 20‑foot no‑parking rule near crosswalks; commission points to city engineer and city manager

Commissioners ask to cite local EOC, clarify CERT and mutual‑aid roles in safety element

Trinidad Planning Commission pushes for clearer noise data, debates labeling of ‘tourist’ noise in draft noise element