[{"_1":2,"_134":-5,"_135":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111,122],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6468061,"mediaKeyId","5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db","parentId",5782829,"title","Votes at a glance: Ramsey County Commission actions from this meeting","audioSeconds",5583,"startMs",202000,"endMs",5785000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db&start=202&end=5785","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db/thumbnail_202000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6468061/Ramsey-County/North-Dakota/Votes-at-a-glance-Ramsey-County-Commission-actions-from-this-meeting","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6468061-35c919d2256ad1da0ba7a7d4a29d30a6/orig.mp4?Expires=1775401022&Signature=ckfBKOdhOiA0mjJUfLcixNA6XrjYejRicZNGXSq85GB4RkoByRii-GiVpXagMDf0LES58WX9UmO4PL9sJZUJ~jWB1kegLAI02feBo2ptP8-~SJQhzk-y5sztcCcaCqNsq443EZUB-X0zIKk-TRdKJfG1Vd5e3qmJsO1c23LKq2CEt7S6xlWE~S9oCMX6E4bBPWccFLUT~tS-f8nbV0XsM~997bXRJ-SzNy2TrGtAAvYEFuFOwJf5VEbh6SsmBl7dCVpoLuGE8h40rMviPgbrcOkOvCzz3VqoRhShqwU1Xwffp1NMagnRF5rLdObd9UU9sc~eFh5MRr41~4SK4alO3w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Ramsey County, KS","date","2025-09-17T00:43:36Z","article","The Ramsey County Commission took the following formal actions during the meeting. Vote tallies are included where recorded on the transcript.

1) Approve minutes (multiple sets)
- Motion: Approve minutes from prior meetings as presented.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried; roll call/voice vote recorded as in meeting).

2) Approve agenda as amended
- Motion: Approve meeting agenda with addition (Bill Woods letter under new business).
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried; voice vote recorded).

3) Doors open for Memorial Building–courthouse roundup (January 2026)
- Motion: Open doors between Memorial Building and courthouse to accommodate the January 2026 roundup.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried; voice vote recorded).

4) Hubdi Properties tax exemption
- Motion: Deny the 100% five‑year property tax exemption requested by Hubdi Properties and Resort.
- Outcome: Approved; roll call recorded in meeting (tally: 5 yes, 0 no).

5) Open public hearing on budget (House Bill 1176 discussion)
- Motion: Suspend regular meeting and open the budget public hearing.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried; procedural vote).

6) Close budget hearing and resume meeting
- Motion: Close public hearing and reopen regular meeting.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried).

7) State's attorney salary adjustment
- Motion: Increase the appointed state's attorney’s salary to the budgeted level for the remainder of the year (align with prior state's attorney budget line item).
- Outcome: Approved; roll call recorded (tally reported in meeting: four votes in favor, one opposed).

8) Approve KLJ Construction invoice ($45,775.20)
- Motion: Approve payment of KLJ invoice for engineering on 80 Ninth Avenue project.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried by roll call).

9) Approve Tri State Paving invoice ($32,493)
- Motion: Approve payment to Tri State Paving for patching/overlay work.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried by roll call).

10) Approve Gleason Construction invoice ($55,850)
- Motion: Approve payment for salt storage structure per contract bid.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried by roll call).

11) Approve Morris Silko invoice for Class 41 material ($10,307.45)
- Motion: Approve payment for materials delivered.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried by roll call).

12) Authorize auditor to sign flex‑fund letters for grant applicants
- Motion: Authorize county auditor to execute administrative letters of understanding for flex‑fund grant applications arriving before the deadline.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried).

13) Authorize grant writing for West Truck Route improvements
- Motion: Direct staff to pursue grant writing for west truck route improvements.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried).

14) Authorize planning study/grant submission for East Truck Route realignment
- Motion: Authorize submission of planning study proposals to explore east truck route realignment.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried).

15) Approve out‑of‑state travel for highway staff
- Motion: Approve requested out‑of‑state travel (Sioux Falls, SD) for highway personnel.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried).

16) Approve auctioneer contract and advertising for surplus auction (Westhead Auction & Appraisal)
- Motion: Approve contract for surplus auction at 5% commission and advertising estimate.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried).

17) Approve bankruptcy litigation plan (Purdue‑related opioid settlement / bankruptcy plan)
- Motion: Approve county’s acceptance of the related bankruptcy plan as part of the opioid settlement process.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried).

18) Approve Homestead credit (tax matter)
- Motion: Approve requested homestead credit.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried).

19) Letter of support for a township road/grant application (Mr. Wood)
- Motion: Provide a county letter of support for Mr. Wood’s township grant application.
- Outcome: Approved (motion carried).

For procedural matters (opening/closing the public hearing, approving minutes and the agenda) the meeting used typical majority rules; for fiscal and contract approvals the commission approved staff recommendations and instructed staff on next steps where applicable.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Ramsey County Commission","oneSentenceSummary","Summary list of motions and formal actions taken by the Ramsey County Commission at the meeting, including outcomes and vote tallies where recorded.","taxTitle","Ramsey County, North Dakota","taxId",73636,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6468066,"Ramsey County approves multiple highway invoices and moves ahead on truck‑route and bridge grant proposals",570,5822000,6392000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db&start=5822&end=6392","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db/thumbnail_5822000.jpg","/articles/6468066/Ramsey-County/North-Dakota/Ramsey-County-approves-multiple-highway-invoices-and-moves-ahead-on-truckroute-and-bridge-grant-proposals","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6468066-4dd32e40d59851497fc9a08c8f8833d8/orig.mp4?Expires=1775401022&Signature=J90dSkrkwGfW32Av3DZyupgLKuuA8ynj2MYxRbvT3~DFgW9VSZneCsWZ33-E6PzhqXRUnZ10gn23WJ7s7h~YhnVsHoFd0PCV7CdE2OA-6ExeUuJ-ewn~mTFKYWysRNgq7VHfWPfLtoIWG-2dd9HzEKgsWOgFsMcUEyBM~J96zHNZw9PzvEXSpMluqv7pqPXRi89JNv7uZTbQE1F9V~rDEsij6wtUqcxa5sCA7zqo~GWzXhCpJHn0kmr7IxNvEH5you579vi6YX6RSTvMnUHzuVqJIfCV~upQXjMYK2bm-3xb17cJg4FlJy2AevNQs7AjI2ut278F0MOEteZFYwDgCQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Ramsey County Commission approved payments for several road and construction invoices and authorized staff to pursue multiple transportation grants.

Highway director Jason presented invoices and asked the commission to approve payment for the KLJ Construction engineering invoice for $45,775.20 related to an 80 Ninth Avenue parking/road project; Tri State Paving’s $32,493 invoice for asphalt patching and overlays; Gleason Construction’s $55,850 invoice for a new salt storage structure; and 448.15 tons of Class 41 material from Morris Silko at $23 per ton, $10,307.45. The commission approved each invoice by motion and roll call.

Commissioners praised Tri State Paving’s work after several residents called to compliment the patching. Jason said the salt shed construction is complete and the 80 Ninth Avenue project is nearing final grading.

On grants, county staff reported Bridge 36‑101‑20 — the concrete structure south of Church’s Ferry — is a semifinalist in the state’s GRAMA flex‑fund program for a removal project. Staff explained that, if the county accepts construction funding from the state program, the county’s share would be limited to preliminary costs (the flex fund would pay construction and construction engineering), and the county’s current local share for bridge inspection is roughly $3,000.

The commission authorized the county auditor to sign letters of understanding for flex‑fund applications and voted to proceed with grant writing for truck‑route improvements. Jason and Paul (county engineer) said the west truck‑route work would be entered for available statewide funds (staff estimated roughly $40 million available statewide) and that the east‑side truck‑route realignment would begin with a planning study (estimated planning‑level study under $250,000) that could later be phased into construction. The commission approved both pursuing grant options.

The commission also approved an auctioneer contract (5% commission) and advertising to conduct the county surplus auction and authorized out‑of‑state travel for highway staff to attend training.

No construction funding commitments beyond preliminary costs were approved at the meeting; staff emphasized that construction would require future approvals and local match if necessary.","The commission approved several highway invoices totaling about $144,425, authorized county staff to sign flex‑fund letters of understanding, and approved grant planning and applications for truck‑route improvements; a nearby bridge is a semifinalist for a state removal grant.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6468072,"County and Law Enforcement Center to revisit captain pay after budget miscommunication",304,3026000,3330000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db&start=3026&end=3330","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db/thumbnail_3026000.jpg","/articles/6468072/Ramsey-County/North-Dakota/County-and-Law-Enforcement-Center-to-revisit-captain-pay-after-budget-miscommunication","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6468072-df99e2e8fae8b4c4ff05fb233bdbd3d8/orig.mp4?Expires=1775401022&Signature=Sz-Nm8KFC1YRsBA~R87Iv4uZynSSKhmoVTmyf5WWSL6nT3hsBwIokw6BNYCIxjF9wZC-lEgaeCuFVmAxY-8wX4GyGCx-Jv0W1Tk3RZfN6OM98OpD~qDM5jPvEj~cUx~f~ZvSwIzZMlsUHknVLHRZwjQcoR5jdk8inZ-ueJrldiuaRwgYnA89yDKe6mUcVM7GU9psHBIFWVnmgAUsyvnyVb5gcovl8ke6KpBwKJNrhykkb1fqw1EH-oltGwDLdCFnPMkFVfyh2uZCPtLRuxIRaTrOTqVIO9E-w87vq5ndiFzqyIMb2UvXPjzicznqYxnbyN~YjhQ45sCn2ajNIlExpQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Commissioners and Law Enforcement Center (LEC) representatives told the Ramsey County Commission they will revisit how the LEC captain’s salary and benefits are shared after acknowledging a communication breakdown.

The dispute arose after the LEC board voted not to include the captain’s salary in the LEC budget; county staff said the county’s preliminary budget had assumed a 50/50 cost share. Commissioners said the lack of prior coordination created confusion for the sheriff’s office and the LEC board.

Commissioners and the LEC representative discussed the fiscal and benefits implications. County representatives noted that corrections staff and LEC employees historically have different retirement benefit structures; the captain — employed through the sheriff’s office — would receive public‑safety retirement benefits that differ from other LEC staff and produce a larger county cost when split. Commissioners said the captain’s retirement benefit likely would remain tied to the county’s payroll and could not simply be reassigned to the LEC without changes to agreements.

Several commissioners said the county should update the memorandum of understanding or the joint powers agreement governing the LEC to clarify cost‑sharing and benefit responsibilities moving forward. No formal vote was taken at the commission meeting to change payroll or benefits; commissioners asked staff and the LEC board to address the issue at upcoming meetings so the arrangement is clear for the next budget cycle.

Commissioners also clarified that prior hiring and benefit decisions predate current leadership and that any structural change to retirement benefits would require formal agreement by the parties and could have long‑term cost implications.","Commissioners and Law Enforcement Center (LEC) board members acknowledged a communication breakdown over whether the LEC captain’s salary would be split 50/50 between Ramsey County and the LEC; they agreed to revisit the joint powers agreement and the matter at upcoming meetings.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6468077,"Ramsey County opens 2026 budget hearing; officials explain statewide changes to tax notices under House Bill 1176",970,1973000,2943000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db&start=1973&end=2943","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db/thumbnail_1973000.jpg","/articles/6468077/Ramsey-County/North-Dakota/Ramsey-County-opens-2026-budget-hearing-officials-explain-statewide-changes-to-tax-notices-under-House-Bill-1176","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6468077-d2a0f3a1754ab0a5add0e71085a4ea0e/orig.mp4?Expires=1775401022&Signature=TLmNKJAKoSq4WUAxIvcQyYL1woY-5RUmT~r5tHL7MF0i1n4ZY4eseWW6R7YT8BZBuiEbc7FjmYFT7PFMxQq8Gez3K3dNqpY998BvY3UT04XAfETwYIuXxyVtR-EC7bFnbTXuACBvJeo~wPcoHyysGjncjxclAxFsz0jlXHmdUeLw3m3WcXZ4YkSmtyeSj7OXmqBNywQ8BGEG3jIHQLX1JuJXEJz~hjBiwKTapJwlA1aQCqFIxugFyCwU3k9SosDp13N~R794o70tfRnqzxcbgfuCoDP359D1z7W~wPCq26FDD4DygiFVze~tMwSneVtPptM-zVtWM4U5JVX3tnKuRA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Ramsey County Commission opened a public hearing on the 2026 budget and used the forum to explain a recent state law change — House Bill 1176 — that alters how property tax notices will be presented to taxpayers.

County staff and commissioners told residents HB 1176 eliminated the earlier itemized estimated tax statement that showed the distribution of tax dollars between county, school district, township and other levies. Under the new process, residents will receive a notice showing their total tax amount rather than the prior breakdown by taxing entity. County officials said the change was made by the state legislature and the county must follow state law.

Commissioners also discussed how the county’s local 3% cap on tax increases interacts with certain levies that are exempt from the cap — for example, Garrison Diversion, state medical school levies and bond debt levies for school construction. Staff warned that those levies can cause a taxpayer’s total increase to exceed 3% even where the county’s portion is capped.

During the hearing, a resident asked how to dispute an assessment. Staff described the existing appeals process: first the township equalization meeting, then the county equalization meeting and, if unresolved, the state equalization board. Staff said those appeal steps remain available under HB 1176 even though the matrix breakdown will no longer be mailed in the same format.

No policy change to Ramsey County’s budget was adopted at the hearing; the hearing provided the statutorily required public forum and the commission later closed the hearing and resumed regular business.","County officials held a public hearing on the 2026 budget and explained changes required by House Bill 1176 that will eliminate the prior itemized estimated tax statements residents received.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":46,"_47":116,"_49":117,"_51":118,"_53":119,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":120,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":121,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6468082,"Ramsey County raises state's attorney salary to budgeted level after review and debate",2123,3662000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db&start=3662&end=5785","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db/thumbnail_3662000.jpg","/articles/6468082/Ramsey-County/North-Dakota/Ramsey-County-raises-states-attorney-salary-to-budgeted-level-after-review-and-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6468082-c6c6f34d5cb4640025e2c8c612196c3a/orig.mp4?Expires=1775401022&Signature=T~-qd-X2KCCXBCBAtMfBLjSwkUt36cXoDBeyCaA1U~iQ~gUPwR~7Lu1wjNjA5W3JaRWTdef-sTv5zeHh3ClpXhku-kBUdPPEdIJ5OXkaOy6KZIpGGCpJTpcq5H42id3NgwFopHpdk1p5xtII8LNtUCNpVyqKyJ~c036CizI88hIpMRzaOzc6-wulGNOwwUFcK-7ZyXuMAukJUUfvR2t8PNTBR5hweUa2iiPs1AXT0X-oNZXXRXPtr00a9I9frZ0YhjLg1E19g6xAAy6aRHe5pxp--BKpnE8RfeTzYnQUFqbkHGad~Lbj6SSspxRetCTPbCFLuXpcAOLTEH2zv5-OSw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Ramsey County Commission voted to increase the state's attorney’s salary to the amount already in the county’s budget line item, following an eight‑month performance period and letters of support submitted on behalf of the office. The motion to increase the salary passed on a roll call vote.

Daniel (the county’s appointed state's attorney) told the commission that when he was appointed earlier in the year he accepted a salary lower than his predecessor and later requested the remainder of the budgeted salary based on his office’s performance, increased responsiveness and letters from law‑enforcement and court partners. Daniel said his office has improved communication and workload handling since his appointment and sought the budgeted salary for the remainder of the year, not back pay.

Commission discussion focused on how adjustments interact with the county’s step/grade pay system and whether approving the request would set a precedent for other hires. Commissioners noted the importance of retaining qualified attorneys in a rural county and that the county faces competition from larger jurisdictions. One commissioner described the idea of treating the first months as a probationary period tied to performance; others warned about complicating the step-based compensation system and opening similar requests from other employees.

After debate and several clarifying questions about grades, steps and the effect on next year’s budget, a motion to bring the state's attorney salary to the budgeted level passed on roll call with four votes in favor and one opposed. The county will reflect the approved salary change in payroll and in next year’s budget planning as appropriate.

The commission did not authorize additional retroactive pay; the increase covers the remainder of the year and will be reflected in budgeting and future step calculations.","After an extended discussion about step increases, retention and precedent, the Ramsey County Commission approved raising the state's attorney’s salary from about $108,000 to the budgeted figure of roughly $116,000 for the remainder of the year.",{"_33":123,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":124,"_41":125,"_43":126,"_45":127,"_47":128,"_49":129,"_51":130,"_53":131,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":132,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":133,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6468087,"Ramsey County Commission denies 100% tax exemption request for Hubdi resort expansion",888,841000,1729000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db&start=841&end=1729","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5782829-9e0935fc1ec9f8df483ba5ddcf4e82db/thumbnail_841000.jpg","/articles/6468087/Ramsey-County/North-Dakota/Ramsey-County-Commission-denies-100-tax-exemption-request-for-Hubdi-resort-expansion","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6468087-9e0a4a231a58313c8204abea55c85a6d/orig.mp4?Expires=1775401022&Signature=hUou18lvY~5Ecn0JmdHScu6Gf1l1XFI9p5Sj9Swpsw2RbGbpkPMhmDIs71PnpUkp7UuSDwV4nKUo1vLjuBqmPaUmIT9oQlnd3gMWjDMTwoNVPOpVfM59hpsva8HgILFGsOb7EmL6l93~HQCxI2--T9iC8JIdoZko0KlFSE7Q7dmLWf3Kq0FuHng~xKTUt4txYBtBnOiyNxDI45gujT2mWaM4KRSV5g2KjfF-WSICvKIjb1LNhwHZ6ywpxYnrYiln-LyuvqKeXRB1UJGpy94uaMBU5GIoBXGtldoOrr9UQeetuJjpmUqmJCgYvX4HvrGc1kFr8qBgmRWSP6araRxp-g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Ramsey County commissioners voted to deny a request from Hubdi Properties and Resort for a five-year, 100% property tax exemption for an expansion and renovation project at the resort. The commission’s motion to deny carried in roll call after extended discussion of whether the program is intended for new businesses.

The request was presented by John Hubdi, who said the new owners have increased occupancy, added employees and converted three residential houses to rental units that he said each generate about $80,000 to $90,000 in annual revenue. Hubdi told the commission his changes since acquiring the resort in January include expanding the marina and increasing year‑over‑year occupancy and revenue.

County staff member Beth (tax assessor) told commissioners the renovations Hubdi cited would increase taxable value by roughly $600,000 and, at current mill rates, equate to roughly $16,000–$17,000 in additional property tax revenue. Hubdi’s application listed approximately $128,000 in renovations.

School and township representatives opposed the full exemption. Corey Mar, representing the local school board, told the commission his board discussed the application and opposed a 100% exemption for five years because the school relies solely on property taxes and a full exemption would reduce its revenue. Al Gangel, representing the township, said his board had not met to take a formal position but suggested shorter or phased exemption terms as a compromise.

Commissioners questioned whether the county’s incentive program should be used for existing businesses that are being renovated rather than for new or major expansions. Commissioner discussion referenced recent public scrutiny at the state level of large tax exemptions and the principle that exemptions shift the tax burden to other taxpayers.

After discussion, a commissioner moved to deny the 100% five‑year property tax exemption for Hubdi Properties and Resort; the motion was seconded and carried. The commission did not approve any alternative exemption terms at the meeting.

The county clerk’s office will record the commission’s decision and Hubdi Properties may pursue other options or reapply with modified terms, but no subsequent action was taken at the meeting on this application.","The Ramsey County Commission voted to deny a five-year, 100% property tax exemption requested by Hubdi Properties and Resort for renovations and expansion of an existing resort, after school-district and township representatives objected.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Ramsey County Commission actions from this meeting

Ramsey County approves multiple highway invoices and moves ahead on truck‑route and bridge grant proposals

County and Law Enforcement Center to revisit captain pay after budget miscommunication

Ramsey County opens 2026 budget hearing; officials explain statewide changes to tax notices under House Bill 1176

Ramsey County raises state's attorney salary to budgeted level after review and debate

Ramsey County Commission denies 100% tax exemption request for Hubdi resort expansion