[{"_1":2,"_135":-5,"_136":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,111,123],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6467397,"mediaKeyId","5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5","parentId",5796872,"title","Votes at a glance: Cole County Commission actions, Aug. 19, 2025","audioSeconds",1633,"startMs",4603000,"endMs",6236000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5&start=4603&end=6236","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5/thumbnail_4603000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6467397/Cole-County/Missouri/Votes-at-a-glance-Cole-County-Commission-actions-Aug-19-2025","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6467397-fc309088c7ae70af4631b82220269a5b/orig.mp4?Expires=1773078474&Signature=Mh7DuUxCa9wNN~UYBGs4dJt8JdKg3os96ZW3ZTb0OxN0locLTFNBXJwypP-THk2UKX7QPOpBFCcdP9pM2vaQsgwjqXbV0otOJNdGRXoRgtdV4eMPA01WnzRr6HVzxV4CglXmoKRf3yo5D1ECRbu-Wol~yI4fRUwaeobieNZHa~FPGvZoLC1HWpwPSPac0C0jrQPmoYC3czA~XO9LrNZHeQWz0y1x4WiHu19URJTnePtt~ugIhFlKSH7VEa8fkuzC~29NBCUAPwOyn0JstTOF0Ab2S-d9XxE3x6d~wmy-VxuFalKLYVZMbAldxLCezHbASn4Xnl-TD1Zzj6B7CLAu9g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Cole County","date","2025-09-19T20:26:09Z","article","The Cole County Commission took a series of formal actions during its Aug. 19 meeting. Below are actions recorded on the public record, listed with available motion text, outcomes and key details.

Votes at a glance

1) Architects Alliance — Southridge EMS phase‑1 study
Motion: Approve Architects Alliance professional services agreement for phase‑1 preliminary study ($10,350) with optional $1,500 for exterior renderings.
Outcome: Approved.

2) Accounts payable
Motion: Approve accounts payable pending review.
Outcome: Approved.

3) WIC position changes
Motion: Approve dual allocation of the nutrition coordinator/dietitian position (add competent professional authority title) and change breastfeeding peer counselor to part‑time (salary reduction stated). Net effect: reduction in WIC salary line.
Outcome: Approved.

4) Easement across county property (Yanski)
Motion: Approve revised easement across county property and accept quitclaim deeds relinquishing rights to prior mis‑described easement; correct historic errors in original document.
Outcome: Approved.

5) Health Department security cameras
Motion: Approve Precision (vendor) proposal to replace four interior and one exterior camera damaged by water; request funding from contingency.
Outcome: Approved; funded from contingency.

6) Router replacements (two routers)
Motion: Approve Hubert Associates (quote) for two router replacements (health department and public works), $7,218.72 each (two separate purchases).
Outcome: Approved.

7) 2025 concrete joint sealing project
Motion: Award contract to Sweeden's Sealing Services LLC for $76,453.96 to seal joints on repaired concrete streets (prevention of water infiltration and base damage); project covers roughly 19.3 miles centerline of streets (total joint length 29.1 miles).
Outcome: Approved; contract signed.

8) Video surveillance system enhancement (Annex, courthouse and maintenance)
Motion: Award 2025‑22 video surveillance system enhancement contract to Midmo Telecom and Security for $230,500 with a $3,000 trade‑in; maintenance year‑2 and year‑3 costs noted lower than competing vendor.
Outcome: Approved.

9) Sheriff’s fleet vehicle maintenance awards (2025‑26)
Motion: Multiple award for vehicle fleet maintenance: Donnie Braun & Sons and Big O Tires (contracts signed for each vendor per bid award).
Outcome: Approved.

10) Architects Alliance — Cole County Juvenile Center
Action: Architects Alliance presented DD materials (no formal contract vote recorded at this session). Next steps: CD submission anticipated in November.

Notes and context: several motions were made and seconded; most votes were passed by the assembled commissioners. Where dollar amounts were referenced in motions, they are included above. If specific mover/second names or roll‑call tallies were not read into the record, the commission recorded motions as approved during the meeting.

Provenance: each line item corresponds to motions and contract approvals made on the Aug. 19 agenda and recorded in the public meeting transcript.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Cole County Commission 08/19/2025 (combined videos)","oneSentenceSummary","At its Aug. 19 meeting the commission approved multiple contracts, position changes and procurement awards. This roundup lists motions approved during the session and key contract amounts where specified.","taxTitle","Cole County, Missouri","taxId",65809,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6467402,"Cole County leaders weigh jail capacity options as out‑of‑county housing costs near $500,000 year‑to‑date",2580,6414000,8994000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5&start=6414&end=8994","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5/thumbnail_6414000.jpg","/articles/6467402/Cole-County/Missouri/Cole-County-leaders-weigh-jail-capacity-options-as-outofcounty-housing-costs-near-500000-yeartodate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6467402-69f97346f87ee5e442d3b9b2fa9642ba/orig.mp4?Expires=1773078474&Signature=J7QIZ5hB6uYbdOzhGt2b3QbBcexWPKmDJO~vPyUSaUdzzqm47m8Nx7IGRK18Q7yeg4YClIusTwrQ4SSTVWRt8G~UXc7kkR0JsNIXfUd7lk1i-DSwixiIrx3AGC8gkzz6c57~ytX21UMXlT0m1WgwHiKvQ1-hRTPM44CKDQl25nr4VWxHbJqq9JftQyQHxSCbkEhZxovPX1~fhTTARc9eSvU8IzgFsGmHiNo-2YOcXlkvYEBhidBVfHqmWnBDDYdp0fHhOc4mPrO4M8pwQu2Y8HZp2THJH7Ah4-8xtX3nh1wxf1T21qujUaUsDM2LmlPg3e9b-~VqeOgh-kBzG26HcA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","County leaders used the Aug. 19 meeting to discuss jail population dynamics and the rising expense of housing inmates out of county. Commissioners were told the county had spent roughly $297,000 through July to house prisoners outside Cole County and that, if annualized, that pace could exceed the $450,000 budgeted for the year. The sheriff and prosecutor described multiple drivers for out‑of‑county housing, including classification needs, capacity mismatches by sex and security level, and the county’s use of federal contracts that both generate revenue and require enhanced security protocols.

Key points raised included:
- Federal holds: Cole County houses federal detainees under contract; commissioners were told the federal partnership brings revenue but also requires specific handling and staffing (including two deputies for transport and additional security standards). The sheriff said federal partners have capacity and that a larger local facility would likely attract more federal holds. Commissioners noted federal revenue can offset operating costs.
- Out‑of‑county housing drivers: The jail must classify inmates by custody level and sex; shortfalls in particular categories or spikes in female population can force the county to contract beds elsewhere. Transport costs and staff time to move detainees to remote facilities further increase operational expense.
- Possible responses: suggestions included converting a part‑time prosecutor to full time to speed case processing, more aggressive scheduling of probation‑violation hearings where revocation results in transfer to state custody, and evaluating a build‑out of the existing jail’s interstitial space to add beds (an estimated 180‑bed build‑out was discussed in concept). Commissioners discussed the capital and operating tradeoffs: building more capacity would require bond or sales‑tax decisions and lead to higher recurring staffing and medical costs.

Why it matters: the county is facing rising recurring and one‑off costs to house detainees; decisions about operations, staffing and capital expansion influence both short‑term county budgets and long‑term policy on incarceration and regional contracts.

Commissioners asked staff to produce cost estimates and options for an interstitial build‑out and to explore revenue and financing options (including potential sales‑tax changes and consulting support used during prior jail planning). Commission and sheriff agreed to continue analysis with architects and financial advisors to determine what level of build‑out, staffing and financing would be needed.

Provenance: the jail capacity discussion began in the Aug. 19 meeting when commissioners and the sheriff reviewed YTD out‑of‑county housing costs and the county's federal‑hold arrangements.","Commissioners, the sheriff and prosecutors discussed rising costs to house inmates outside the county and considered options including operational changes, converting part‑time prosecutor roles to full time and building out additional jail beds.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6467407,"Cole County schedules public hearing on 2025 tax levies after new assessed‑value totals arrive",1869,1657000,3526000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5&start=1657&end=3526","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5/thumbnail_1657000.jpg","/articles/6467407/Cole-County/Missouri/Cole-County-schedules-public-hearing-on-2025-tax-levies-after-new-assessedvalue-totals-arrive","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6467407-1e75ddf82f492daf61de33eb9d719531/orig.mp4?Expires=1773078474&Signature=MN6QXFkBvWBlLM2EKV4swydn2LxINkLmg8PB42XkQTc4K5JyXEJ7-0CFyZisbkWPJt4L7UugkwYAomLT~eO88AD4Fn34uHo2TCQ0FDY5N4Y7Hk9WmxypgbD4IVV5kXU-K4h35pGRIi9Ytfeb7IauGz9LwsU94o9bZGPa51EQQAfVQxznRcVw7gWkfRGj2m43FgZDF8AcE0qYtG1fVRPCF-xfa4oXUjG9Jv093WGNVp8y7P7jtW3N9dUtEL4Elp6TngsKrsu8ee3uITrXRNv9ac68MESbO0-KMvIHd30DJ33xFnTK22PuxLc4MwTG3rvKq-YE5R2Zv~0enyGtiNB-pg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","County staff presented updated assessed‑value totals from the Board of Equalization and explained how state formulas and the cost‑of‑living index affect tax levy ceilings. Staff said the state auditor’s prescribed calculation yields a lower ceiling for the public works levy this year and that the formula’s interaction with assessed values and the CPI produced a reduced general revenue ceiling as well.

The county clerk delivered the new totals late the previous evening; the commission scheduled public hearings for the next Tuesday and directed staff to present the formal levy ordinances. Staff explained the interplay of assessed value increases, the state‑set CPI (2.9 percent used in the examples) and the statutory rollback mechanism that keeps a political subdivision from gaining disproportionate property tax revenue solely from valuation increases.

Why it matters: assessed‑value changes, state‑prescribed CPI adjustments and rollback calculations affect local tax levies and the county’s revenue envelope; the results determine next year’s property tax rates and revenue available for county services.

County staff recommended the commission post the general revenue and public works levies for the advertised public hearing next week; commissioners asked questions about the calculations and said they will vote after the hearing. The clerk confirmed the public notices were published twice because of the scheduling change.

Provenance: the county clerk and treasurer discussed the updated assessed totals and the county’s application of the state auditor’s levy calculation routine during the Aug. 19 meeting.","County staff briefed commissioners on new assessed value totals and state calculation limits that reduced local tax levy ceilings; the commission set public hearings for next week to finalize the general revenue and public works levies.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6467412,"Cole County approves Architects Alliance phase‑1 study for Southridge EMS renovation",495,4144000,4639000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5&start=4144&end=4639","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5/thumbnail_4144000.jpg","/articles/6467412/Cole-County/Missouri/Cole-County-approves-Architects-Alliance-phase1-study-for-Southridge-EMS-renovation","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6467412-c6a206e88997c937b311a582f72f56ba/orig.mp4?Expires=1773078474&Signature=nBWb05R2-pP2hYWdVcBHIulWfcGSvAKjIjKV0kZiX-uiL9yds9ntK8UEInnj0OqLCFbTa1cynVaQP9eysRK9OEQdTqbWyGfA6XHOkQKgkulayWmWHYvVs-oQUyZmxni-GsEk~TVn4c2xXMyrRqIpU-OXsPWfOzzTGAlsNk7oe9bT937wdPaMP2xgRCPPAlIQ8fxwZYJrTpqTr78LFiR5qhS09p0WNdGF4y-Kd4GPHfqEaPDj4qUoIKHqPY4Aluwosxq19cSN6yRSSXZIBy308UmrUeKm9N2Llo4JZoRDwKWFiq32mgyo5OMB8g9jaiCzwGj~zdHoqh1i3PetzjYNpQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Cole County Commission approved a professional services agreement with Architects Alliance to perform a phase‑1 preliminary study for renovation of the Southridge Drive EMS facility. The agreement covers as‑built documentation, mechanical/electrical/plumbing (MEP) review, drainage and floor damage assessment, and recommendations for stabilizing or removing a water‑damaged mezzanine.

Architects Alliance proposed a $10,350 fee for the study plus an optional $1,500 fee for exterior renderings. County staff said EMS has earmarked approximately $500,000 in its 2026 capital budget request toward the project and that the study will inform scope and cost estimates for that request. The consultants will document existing conditions (the county presently lacks reliable as‑built drawings), evaluate drainage and legacy mechanical issues in ambulance bays, and propose options for the mezzanine and exterior repairs.

Why it matters: the facility has active operational needs for EMS, evidence of water damage and infrastructure concerns. The study is intended to create a usable, modeled record of the building that can underpin future capital funding and maintenance work.

Commission discussion noted the value of capturing accurate as‑built documentation, the need to coordinate electrical updates and the potential for the study to recommend immediate fixes (trench drain recommendations and other short‑term repairs). Commissioners voted to approve contracting with Architects Alliance for the phase‑1 study so the county can proceed with budget planning and more detailed design work if elected in the capital program.

Provenance: discussion and motion to approve the proposal occurred on the Aug. 19 agenda where Abigail Stec (Architects Alliance) joined staff to explain scope and cost; the commission approved the motion.","Commission authorized a $10,350 phase‑1 study and an optional $1,500 exterior rendering package from Architects Alliance to document conditions and develop a scope and budget for Southridge EMS station renovations.",{"_33":112,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":113,"_41":114,"_43":115,"_45":116,"_47":117,"_49":118,"_51":119,"_53":120,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":121,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":122,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6467416,"Cole County adjusts court services budget as county adds a sixth judge, hears jury‑trial cost concerns",1501,1844,1503694,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5&start=1&end=1503","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5/thumbnail_1844.jpg","/articles/6467416/Cole-County/Missouri/Cole-County-adjusts-court-services-budget-as-county-adds-a-sixth-judge-hears-jurytrial-cost-concerns","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6467416-30a0048db577917d0aca7b430d7e935e/orig.mp4?Expires=1773078474&Signature=L7RqR2uQ~GEN5F3XWHCa4eWYywgzHdpztKN4EEowV0Z~7ehxEQKcJp8PRa1y0GRW3~9jvXfRaAsqzbchd423nyKFxQ3gxy--q6bA7NVkrv9CmgMtOANBYQDeC3OkyZ9WUcgs6w12Id51KAO-UZ9jJecinDOv38Przez0gojrs61TtzF8ky6wVbBhvB-MDA7WiEgVySZ1tTpqO728WAPQ1PpXhuddyVZKK7w6qyOb9xb6zcQy1UJaC7uiIPU8BlmCiQ-JIxqo2hXP-BXUz3uBDqGRocOyq8bwitaH5F1u8IjbodxJvEviEHuuyltDQfLttn44DG-jS1o0VbBef9438A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","County court services staff told the commission they used last year’s budget as the base for the proposed 2026 court budget but adjusted line items to reflect one additional judge — moving from five to six judges — and the staff that judge requires, including a court reporter and an additional marshal.

Court staff said those personnel additions were significant in cost‑sensitive line items and that they also boosted training dollars for marshals and judges because they have newer staff in both ranks. Staff identified the head marshal as Holly Butler and said that the head marshal is a state‑paid position; county payroll covers court security marshals and pretrial staff.

Commissioners and court staff flagged two large potential expenses that are not part of the baseline budget: a recent statute change on jury mileage that could increase jury pay and an anticipated multi‑week sequestered trial transferred from Platte County that would require substantial sequestration costs if it occurs in the next several years. Court staff said the sequestered trial is not reflected in the current proposed budget.

Why it matters: personnel and training additions linked to a new judge raise recurring costs; unexpected or statutory changes (jury mileage) and rare but large expenses (long, sequestered trials) can create material year‑to‑year volatility.

Other budget items discussed included pretrial services’ request for pay adjustments tied to state changes and the county‑wide salary study; commissioners discussed whether to adopt targeted salary adjustments now or delay decisions until the county salary study concludes. County staff reminded commissioners of legal restrictions on changing court budgets after statutory deadlines (the staff noted a September 1 deadline for certain changes), though commissioners also discussed historically applied exceptions such as approving final COLA adjustments later in the year.

The commission approved the proposed court budget as presented except for salaries; members added a footnote that the salary totals must be adopted on or before Sept. 1 and agreed to revisit salary adjustments separately. Commissioners emphasized they want consistent treatment across county departments and a completed salary study before adopting non‑COLA adjustments for courts and court‑related staff.

Provenance: the court budget presentation and subsequent commissioner discussion and motion were recorded in the meeting packet and the commission's August 19 public session.","Court staff and commissioners discussed budget changes tied to a newly added judge — including a court reporter, an extra marshal, training increases, and jury mileage and sequestration cost concerns not included in the proposed budget.",{"_33":124,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":125,"_41":126,"_43":127,"_45":128,"_47":129,"_49":130,"_51":131,"_53":132,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":133,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":134,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6467421,"Cole County architects report design-development progress on $14 million juvenile center",1381,1970000,3351000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5&start=1970&end=3351","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5796872-15b98e9b7876a43ddc590a7cfea289c5/thumbnail_1970000.jpg","/articles/6467421/Cole-County/Missouri/Cole-County-architects-report-design-development-progress-on-14-million-juvenile-center","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6467421-026f03670b8991567824d1bd7935b092/orig.mp4?Expires=1773078474&Signature=nbIYLKZJWYdZnD9R8b1o9Y-TEmiGio8i4wGIwXEbp2rFvV0hDs4SnNklFtPiUpOLNb-B5GJz-HnfIe665XTsPEZNc7oCbMzt8bfb4qfL0DzQPppf9Sw62AE1yfZhra6CEPMPIx40Jd7fjEJ87JCql5gZF9u1jCWihf8Fbk797DLatcdQsbRtO0sxFwLTlx3ATafLEMBKYiUcxMosdGWkqed1sxNikL1KsE-XR8r~zEvf5HqwSKwn~Ot9DcIlaoJ3ePxAbG876B8wi8a5RaPzh3rysMQWk~WPSu8Jwir3DhQ0ktbBNWK0ybciWTNCCOjgIKTscdKkabfbsW03OImMmQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Architects Alliance presented the design-development (DD) documents for the proposed Cole County Juvenile Center, saying the project remains on a $14,000,000 target and that the team plans to submit 50 percent construction documents by mid‑November.

The firm said the DD set expands schematic design choices into engineered systems — HVAC, structural framing, plumbing, electrical and security — and that the next step is a construction-document (CD) submission to support contractor bidding. Mitchell (Architects Alliance) told the commission the team expects to issue bid documents in mid‑November and run a five‑week bid period, with a guaranteed maximum price (GMP) possible near year‑end and potential site mobilization in January or March 2027 depending on weather and contractor schedules.

Why it matters: the county has aimed for a $14 million budget for the center; the DD presentation showed where design choices affect cost and constructability and identified a short list of alternates and value‑engineering options should bids come in over budget.

Key details from the DD set include a two‑zone building concept (secure detention and nonsecure respite/administration), coordinated site work with stormwater detention and relocated parking to reduce earthwork, and a trimmed program that reduced square footage in the gym/respite areas to stay within the budget target. Architects reported savings from lowering portions of the building grade and tightening the plan geometry to simplify foundations and reduce fill. Exterior materials proposed are a masonry wainscot for durability at the lowest 48 inches and metal panel elsewhere; roofing will use EPDM or TPO on flat areas and metal panels over sloped volumes.

Security, mechanical redundancy and long‑lead items were highlighted. The team priced an HVAC redundancy option — splitting a large rooftop RTU into two smaller units — at roughly a $49,000 premium for the secure area; the architects said that increases resilience but also cost. The DD set also includes a detailed door and access schedule and coordination with the security specialist for camera, control and door hardware locations.

Commission discussion touched on site buffering (the parcel is more than 7 acres with substantial vegetative buffers to nearby development and Highway 50 to the north), access and sally‑port sizing, alternates and the possibility of monthly updates to the commission. The architects said detailed finish selections and technical coordination meetings (interior/exterior finishes, security by camera/camera‑by‑camera, mechanical/electrical/structural coordination) will occur before the CD submission.

Next steps: the team will proceed into the CD phase with an anticipated November CD submission, follow‑up meetings on finishes and security, and a five‑week bidding period. If bids align and the county approves a GMP, construction could begin late winter or early spring with a roughly 12‑month construction period.

Provenance: presentation materials and timeline were discussed from the DD presentation beginning in the commission packet and the public meeting; the commission asked for monthly updates and more detailed alternates and cost breakdowns prior to the CD submission.","Architects Alliance told the Cole County Commission the juvenile center remains on a $14 million target; design-development documents set a November construction-document submission and an expected 12-month build after bidding.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: Cole County Commission actions, Aug. 19, 2025

Cole County leaders weigh jail capacity options as out‑of‑county housing costs near $500,000 year‑to‑date

Cole County schedules public hearing on 2025 tax levies after new assessed‑value totals arrive

Cole County approves Architects Alliance phase‑1 study for Southridge EMS renovation

Cole County adjusts court services budget as county adds a sixth judge, hears jury‑trial cost concerns

Cole County architects report design-development progress on $14 million juvenile center