[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6466460,"mediaKeyId","5823988-37a1e7a30e0ecca98f9bc2449e7e70a2","parentId",5823988,"title","Council amends budget but delays RDA/CRA study decision; excludes $25,000 consultant item pending RDA hearing","audioSeconds",1359,"startMs",2832000,"endMs",4191000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5823988-37a1e7a30e0ecca98f9bc2449e7e70a2&start=2832&end=4191","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5823988-37a1e7a30e0ecca98f9bc2449e7e70a2/thumbnail_2832000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6466460/Pleasant-View/Weber-County/Utah/Council-amends-budget-but-delays-RDACRA-study-decision-excludes-25000-consultant-item-pending-RDA-hearing","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6466460-981ad5bdbdcdde2fa14d58ae42e369c5/orig.mp4?Expires=1770515864&Signature=X3tVuRCGLL8Rl2uYTUpl3bw28aENHQhCnhUmrhBGsMW-jq7k2txlScE35dGVwyZD4lqWay18zX8TUQp4jfS-Aa1341GFKr0C2k1QoZrZO9fQ7y9gFvwrTknnXDcei4rJ15040e76Uzw53k7xsHMF1MIMzkmyEpHyLD0eNpvrnFEQwEJbGnOFkl13cVyH-aJP3kXv8iRIXzIdHLsoeLMEHC~7vFOeWeetEPD2oP83YE3M0nhR-mJbhEY2NNGcdCCaxTJ84VqhyBiVWzYAQ4MSGgFvyZQvO32YYv9qqKQIqTuBmWLr6wCW-jnnceDemk9Z6CSJYE4iPhNGvskNaKBqOg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Pleasant View","date","2025-09-24T12:16:22.917Z","article","Pleasant View — At a public hearing on Sept. 23 the Pleasant View City Council approved several adjustments to the 2025‑26 fiscal‑year budget but paused action on a $25,000 consultant line intended to support creation of a Community Reinvestment Area (CRA) and potential tax increment financing (TIF).

Laurie (finance) told the council the $25,000 estimate covers a consultant to prepare the CRA/TIF materials and that the cost could later be reimbursed from TIF proceeds if the CRA is created. Laurie said she had not moved the money from the RDA fund and recommended scheduling a separate public hearing to reallocate the funds from the RDA if the council prefers that approach.

Council members discussed TIFs at length. Several council members — including Laurie and Steve — expressed concerns that TIFs shift tax burdens to existing taxpayers and that other taxing entities (the school district, county, fire district) often receive or give up portions of tax increments when a CRA is created. Council members noted the need to show a clear benefit to the city and to secure participation from other taxing districts before committing to a CRA. Council member Steve said he was skeptical of TIFs in general; other members said a reasonable share and contractual protections could make a CRA worthwhile if it attracted the proposed development.

After discussion the council approved the budget adjustment resolution except for the first item in section 1 — the $25,000 consultant line for the CRA/TIF study. Council asked staff to prepare the RDA/CRA package and to return with a public hearing and full financial analysis, including participation commitments from other taxing entities, before the city authorizes the $25,000 expenditure.

On other budget items, the council approved increases for vehicle‑maintenance and storm‑sewer line items to cover an expensive repair to a city street sweeper (staff reported unleaded fuel was mistakenly put into a diesel system and replacement of injectors and pumps is required); staff said they will pursue insurance reimbursement where appropriate. Council approved the remainder of the amendments by roll call.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City Council Meeting - September 23, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Pleasant View City Council approved most proposed 2025‑26 budget amendments at a public hearing Sept. 23 but deferred a $25,000 consultant fee for a proposed CRA/TIF until the city schedules an RDA hearing and secures more inter‑governmental input.","taxTitle","Pleasant View , Weber County, Utah","taxId",7508,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6466471,"Pleasant View council adopts ordinance adding 'cemetery' as conditional use in RE‑20 with 5‑acre minimum",515,509000,1024000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5823988-37a1e7a30e0ecca98f9bc2449e7e70a2&start=509&end=1024","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5823988-37a1e7a30e0ecca98f9bc2449e7e70a2/thumbnail_509000.jpg","/articles/6466471/Pleasant-View/Weber-County/Utah/Pleasant-View-council-adopts-ordinance-adding-cemetery-as-conditional-use-in-RE20-with-5acre-minimum","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6466471-2ecd5f09e5f90e67b6cd39e5f507774b/orig.mp4?Expires=1770515864&Signature=jUe~BbCKdQ0zQXSGmI3DsjUXDnzvwOt94xDGmOxvdkJxhrWQDDEu3ZA9ieoocs8w2SsZGcIyJc-4ij2e2JHkRP6h5UJrleVW6vUMdOXqNnHmtg~3UDYEic6opmw56cfXmyoJ1JpS98Z-GzFeYcnrhTwES4jseC3v~96N~lJBZ1ezb0H4VQ19Tcw4T7XI7gxrUEZbY2Dya1wtF0ao3mDlqKnik-HecwhkZBWqBUErVfdBxTXENRp8vxO-n4oXu-Pk8p4fTw247o6RYeY04nxLuBrbg~kifvpVBWaDz5WeicNcw37oPKD6CebUKxmYF6~emPOa1~KfJFb4BfvccXc3mw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Pleasant View — The Pleasant View City Council on Sept. 23 approved Ordinance 2025‑21 to add a definition for “cemetery” and to list cemeteries as a conditional use in the RE‑20 residential zoning district, with a five‑acre minimum for any cemetery use.

Andrea (staff) told the council the city is partnering with the Ben Lomond Cemetery Maintenance District to develop a cemetery on property north of Admiral Beveridge and west of the church on Thousand West, and that the amendment is intended to allow that development without rezoning the parcel. Andrea read the proposed definition aloud: “Cemetery is a designated parcel of land used for internment of human remains or cremated remains, including a burial park for earth interments, a mausoleum for vault interment, a columbarium for cremated remains, or a combination thereof.”

Council members and staff said the Planning Commission discussed concerns that a broad definition could allow small private backyard cemeteries. The Planning Commission recommended adding a five‑acre minimum to the conditional‑use allowance; Andrea said the draft ordinance was edited to avoid including crematoriums and other uses the council did not want. Council member Gibson moved to adopt the ordinance; council member Yuri seconded the motion. The motion carried on a roll‑call vote, with all council members present voting yes.

Council members asked that, when landscaping is planned for any approved cemetery, the city or partnering district contract with a professional landscaper to ensure an appropriate design. Andrea noted that because the use is a conditional use in RE‑20, council approval of individual proposals will allow additional conditions at the time of application.

The ordinance adds the cemetery definition to chapter 18 and inserts cemetery as a conditional use in the RE‑20 zone, with the five‑acre minimum as written in Ordinance 2025‑21. The council closed the public hearing without public speakers and returned the item to the council for final action.

The ordinance is effective as adopted; further site‑specific approvals will follow standard conditional‑use procedures required by the zoning code.","The Pleasant View City Council approved Ordinance 2025‑21 to add a cemetery definition and permit cemeteries as a conditional use in the RE‑20 residential zone, with a five‑acre minimum and a narrowed definition that excludes crematoriums, after Planning Commission recommendations and a unanimous city council vote.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6466456,"Council discusses speed limits and traffic safety; directs staff to review prior studies and bring proposals",726,4031000,4757000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5823988-37a1e7a30e0ecca98f9bc2449e7e70a2&start=4031&end=4757","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5823988-37a1e7a30e0ecca98f9bc2449e7e70a2/thumbnail_4031000.jpg","/articles/6466456/Pleasant-View/Weber-County/Utah/Council-discusses-speed-limits-and-traffic-safety-directs-staff-to-review-prior-studies-and-bring-proposals","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6466456-6d064545a34412c0bb10bff3e4e1553c/orig.mp4?Expires=1770515864&Signature=c5zf6VeZ~yFp62Yvi8EdODe4he~jHb44binHdQG25vhQiZ1rNOtY5h~iAPKXxoGQwIWbORQFEb74qgwKj4~ekpzRU46BlmyVCBJhA1jssEVxm0vB1dR~Lwe0tMZaxhqQaWb1oJ97byWb0OfKW6iWq~PhHUquabzajkUtrG-qTW8ght3Umcy7RNB04tfXuC44UocmF-hSXaznHmqZJojlaFBj1by1eYYENnv4l8ibXRknwNb38CB~ZeK7-g6Uzpx1qnRtRVb0I6bF~G5muccxVfRXeaWG8OiEm1eOzsJO2gwzjkmallJgXlNFM3S80nlmEhBk3uD4bWymbSwPIG325g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Pleasant View — Council members on Sept. 23 took up a general discussion about traffic safety and speed limits across city streets, focusing on several collector streets and a recurring crash point at 600 West and Alberta.

Mayor and council members raised the idea of standardizing speed limits on “minor collectors” (suggested 35 mph) and discussed specific streets including 500 West, 1000 West, 300 North and Shady Lane. Council members noted inconsistencies: parts of 1000 West are posted at 30 mph in one segment and 40 mph in another; 300 North remains signed at 25 mph despite being drivable at higher speeds; and Shady Lane’s alignment and sidewalk locations prompted debate over appropriate limits.

Council members also discussed the intersection of 600 West and Alberta, which staff reported has seen 33 crashes since the roadway orientation changed about a decade ago (about 3 per year). Council members said many crashes appear to be caused by drivers failing to stop or being distracted; some members argued a roundabout would not address distracted driving and noted winter weather and truck routing complicate engineering fixes.

Council instructed staff to gather available traffic‑study data (the city previously commissioned studies on some corridors), to obtain updated traffic counts and to return with road‑by‑road recommendations instead of adopting a blanket speed‑limit change. Police noted that, under existing procedures, the department can adjust posted limits by up to five miles per hour without a full engineering study but that larger changes or systemwide revisions generally require counts and engineering justification. Council directed staff to bring back recommendations and existing study findings for further action.","Council members debated revising speed limits on several Pleasant View streets, discussed accident data at 600 West and Alberta, and asked staff and police to assemble existing traffic studies and provide counts and recommendations for individual road segments rather than adopting a blanket change.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6466467,"Council tables decision on Hillsborough Drive funding; orders traffic counts and legal check on prescriptive use",1687,1063000,2750000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5823988-37a1e7a30e0ecca98f9bc2449e7e70a2&start=1063&end=2750","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5823988-37a1e7a30e0ecca98f9bc2449e7e70a2/thumbnail_1063000.jpg","/articles/6466467/Pleasant-View/Weber-County/Utah/Council-tables-decision-on-Hillsborough-Drive-funding-orders-traffic-counts-and-legal-check-on-prescriptive-use","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6466467-0b6552c34ddda3b6a7be361021f79eba/orig.mp4?Expires=1770515864&Signature=Kceee~cAzdB0pm6A11dZaNrSLbg78MfqJIL6u1O4AdGb8jPIn1IrHlXkvQIKeKTAvYiizfJ7YWtCoaRNf4p5XAQJ4~TavhiDN0~EW6iBaQlLdiGG8dSq~NM7-E~2ugxes9DwdompoNcvICYAmq83ZdyNfpnzLqTfLlI77WVhiwOpDLx2VR7cRDX2CC~RpyStoUGcgENAm9o92a4Wq8uP-Jlh5W02EjQuXVDRIroln5Vdy36npbGCfFSHBa4wdbF1OX-Kwa6QNJ9Q34NAks-OB0UfTdG6u~FMghGtEwTLoJGr0grMzQq8GU8AnOgr8QuBY1qgoqQzLWGVP7Wu~M8hkw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Pleasant View — The City Council on Sept. 23 tabled action on participating in funding for Hillsborough Drive improvements and directed staff to gather more information before committing city funds.

Staff said Hillsborough Drive is technically a private road owned by property owner Sean Myers but has been used and maintained by the city for years. Andrea (city staff) and other staff presented two engineers’ estimates and recommended the council decide whether and how much the city should contribute toward bringing the road up to city standards to serve an anticipated subdivision and proposed microtel hotel on the west side.

Developer Dave Laloli spoke to the council and said he and his group do not own the road; Sean Myers does. Laloli described plans for a small subdivision and for a microtel hotel that he said would bring guests and tax revenue to the city. He said the parties had discussed sharing the cost of improvements but asked for city participation to move the project forward.

Council members debated options, including a fixed city contribution, a percentage split, or refusing to pay. Suggestions ranged from offering a one‑time payment (examples cited by council members included $30,000 to $50,000) to declining assistance. Concerns included whether the road should remain private or be dedicated as a public right‑of‑way (the road is on the city’s Master Road Plan), future maintenance responsibilities, and whether improvements would relieve traffic pressure on other city streets.

Council member Arrington made a motion to table the funding decision and to direct the police department to perform traffic counts for one to two weeks, have staff consult the city attorney regarding any prescriptive‑use claims and right‑of‑way implications, and contact Sean Myers for additional information. The motion passed on an affirmative voice vote; council members said they will revisit the item after staff returns with traffic data and legal guidance.

No dollar figure was committed at the meeting; council discussion included an illustrative one‑third share (about $28,000 in one estimate) and a suggested $50,000 contribution from the city as a possible compromise, but council members did not approve any of those figures. The developer and property owner will continue the subdivision process and a future council decision will be required if the city elects to contribute funds or accept dedication of the road as a public street.","Pleasant View council members declined to commit city funds for Hillsborough Drive improvements and instead voted to table the matter while directing police to collect traffic counts, staff to consult the city attorney on prescriptive‑use rights, and staff to contact property owner Sean Myers for additional input.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council amends budget but delays RDA/CRA study decision; excludes $25,000 consultant item pending RDA hearing

Pleasant View council adopts ordinance adding 'cemetery' as conditional use in RE‑20 with 5‑acre minimum

Council discusses speed limits and traffic safety; directs staff to review prior studies and bring proposals

Council tables decision on Hillsborough Drive funding; orders traffic counts and legal check on prescriptive use