[{"_1":2,"_94":-5,"_95":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,74,84],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":59,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":65,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},"mediaId",6457944,"mediaKeyId","5825390-f79bfc00865ee3a57f1db5aaa8f0ea1d","parentId",5825390,"title","River Heights planning commission forwards revised sign code to public hearing Oct. 14","audioSeconds",1326,"startMs",1806000,"endMs",3132000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5825390-f79bfc00865ee3a57f1db5aaa8f0ea1d&start=1806&end=3132","thumbnailUrl","https://d352y6ypj4mjo3.cloudfront.net/AudioPlaceholder.png","articleUrl","/articles/6457944/River-Heights/Cache-County/Utah/River-Heights-planning-commission-forwards-revised-sign-code-to-public-hearing-Oct-14","mediaUrl","author","River Heights Planning Commission","date","2025-09-23T18:30:00Z","article","The River Heights City Planning Commission on Sept. 23 voted to send a proposed rewrite of the city’s sign regulations to a public hearing scheduled for Oct. 14.

City planning staff member Sheila presented a consolidated draft adapted from Providence’s code and River Heights’ current rules to make sign standards easier to read and enforce. The draft reorganizes rules into clear categories (temporary/portable yard signs, political signage, home-occupation signage and commercial signage) and specifies dimensions, display durations and location rules.

Commissioners raised several practical questions while reviewing the draft, including how the rules would apply to church signs, school banners and corner lots that can display signs on two street frontages. One commissioner asked how multiple “for sale” signs or election signs on a corner property would be treated; staff noted temporary yard signs are limited to 72 continuous hours in the draft, while other categories have separate limits.

Commissioner discussion also touched on enforcement: several commissioners said they preferred a firmer written standard rather than “loosey-goosey” practice and suggested adding a compliance pathway that allows the council to grant exceptions for requests outside the code. Commissioners discussed that some long-standing signs (for example, a church sign that appears larger than the proposed limits) may be effectively grandfathered, and that staff should handle one-off questions and direct applicants to council when needed.

After review, the commission voted to move the draft forward to a public hearing so the council and public can consider it; staff said the draft would replace the existing Chapter 16 and Title 10 sign provisions if adopted. The commission requested that staff verify cross-jurisdictional issues for signs located on or near the county line and confirmed staff will supply hearing notices in time for the Oct. 14 hearing.

What happens next: the proposed sign code will be the subject of a public hearing on Oct. 14. Staff said the draft will be reviewed by city council and that commissioners and members of the public may suggest revisions at the hearing.

Votes at a glance

- Proposed sign code rewrite — Referred to public hearing on Oct. 14.","mediaType","Audio","parentTitle","River Heights City Planning Commission Meeting - Sep 23, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The River Heights City Planning Commission on Sept. 23 voted to refer a rewritten sign code to a public hearing set for Oct. 14, after staff presented a consolidated draft intended to clarify temporary, political and home-occupation signage rules.","taxTitle","River Heights, Cache County, Utah","taxId",80041,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":75,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":76,"_41":77,"_43":78,"_45":79,"_47":80,"_49":50,"_51":81,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":82,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":83,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6457949,"River Heights panel approves kennel permit for Ballard family, requires fenced yard by April",690,1070000,1760000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5825390-f79bfc00865ee3a57f1db5aaa8f0ea1d&start=1070&end=1760","/articles/6457949/River-Heights/Cache-County/Utah/River-Heights-panel-approves-kennel-permit-for-Ballard-family-requires-fenced-yard-by-April","The River Heights City Planning Commission on Sept. 23 approved a conditional kennel permit for Brenda and Cassandra Ballard of 390 East 700 South with conditions requiring a fenced confinement area and compliance with city animal code.

Brenda and Cassandra Ballard told the commission they own three dogs, two of which they described as service animals. One dog is a trained service dog for an older daughter; a second dog is being trained for a younger daughter with cerebral palsy who needs help opening doors and retrieving assistive devices. The couple said a third dog is a pet that proved too protective to qualify as a service animal.

Ballard said the property is under construction and that they currently use a temporary 15-by-5 panel enclosure and a fenced dog run for confinement. She told the commission two of the dogs are “with us 90% of the time” and that dogs are leashed when outside the run. She said the family already picks up animal waste and disposes of it in their dumpster.

City planning staff (referred to in the record as Sheila) and commissioners discussed code requirements. Staff pointed to River Heights City Code governing kennels and animal nuisances (Chapter 5, Subchapter 2 and provisions referenced as 5-2-4 in the discussion) and said a fenced confinement area is required by the code. Commissioners indicated they have imposed deadlines for fence completion in prior cases and offered that a condition with a completion date was appropriate.

The commission approved the permit with the following conditions read into the record: animals must be confined to a fully fenced area; the applicants must review and follow River Heights City Code Chapter 5 (animal nuisance and kennel rules); the permit is void if the applicants vacate the property; and the required fence must be completed by April (no year specified in the record). The commission added that if construction delays prevent meeting the deadline the applicants should notify the commission to request an extension.

What happens next: the permit becomes official after the administrative processing following the next meeting; staff told the applicants the commission would notify them when the minutes and formal paperwork are ready. The commission noted that repeated nuisance complaints or animal-control responses could subject a kennel permit to revocation under the city code.

Votes at a glance

- Kennel conditional use permit (390 East 700 South; Brenda and Cassandra Ballard) — Approved, with conditions (fenced confinement; complete fence by April; comply with Chapter 5 animal code; permit void if they move).","The River Heights City Planning Commission on Sept. 23 approved a conditional kennel permit for Brenda and Cassandra Ballard of 390 East 700 South, with conditions requiring a fenced confinement area and compliance with city animal code.",{"_33":85,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":86,"_41":87,"_43":88,"_45":89,"_47":90,"_49":50,"_51":91,"_53":-5,"_54":55,"_56":57,"_58":92,"_60":61,"_62":63,"_64":93,"_66":67,"_68":69,"_70":67,"_71":72,"_73":72},6457953,"River Heights planning panel approves 100-foot boundary adjustment for commissioner Keegan Ryan",782,149000,931000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5825390-f79bfc00865ee3a57f1db5aaa8f0ea1d&start=149&end=931","/articles/6457953/River-Heights/Cache-County/Utah/River-Heights-planning-panel-approves-100-foot-boundary-adjustment-for-commissioner-Keegan-Ryan","The River Heights City Planning Commission on Sept. 23 approved a boundary line adjustment that will add roughly 100 feet and about 8,500 square feet to property owned by Commission member Keegan Ryan.

The proposal, explained to the commission by Keegan Ryan, would extend the southwest and southeast corners of his corner lot straight south by 100 feet to square the lot and increase backyard area. Ryan said the adjoining parcel is owned by the Weston family and that the family agreed to sell the 100-foot strip so the expanded area would remain a single parcel and tax ID number.

The change was presented as a boundary adjustment rather than a subdivision or new lot. Ryan told the commission he consulted the county recorder and was told neither state code nor the county required an amended plat for a boundary adjustment; nevertheless, he said he is having Civil Solutions Group survey the new line and that Cash Title Company prepared a legal description and that an amended plat will be recorded when the survey is complete.

Commission members confirmed the city’s code requires a public hearing for this type of adjustment when it lies outside the original plat; the commission then voted to accept the adjustment contingent on documentation. The motion as discussed required that the combined parcel remain under a single tax ID and that a survey be filed showing the new corners and surveyor certification.

Ryan told the commission the added area would provide yard space and possibly a garage long term but that building on the added ground is unlikely because sewer and utilities are located on 4 South and would make development there infeasible. He also said the Westons recommended 100 feet to avoid creating an awkward leftover strip that could complicate future development of the larger field.

No formal roll-call vote with named commissioners was read into the record; the commission chair called for the motion and the commission voiced approval.

The record shows the applicant intends to record the survey and amended plat despite the applicant’s representation that neither state code nor county recording rules strictly require a plat amendment for this type of boundary adjustment.

What happens next: the applicant’s survey and legal description will be recorded to reflect the adjusted lines and the city will retain the public hearing record. The commission noted a commissioner with a personal interest must recuse from voting when appropriate.

Votes at a glance

- Boundary line adjustment for property owned by Keegan Ryan — Approved (motion to accept, contingent on a recorded survey and single tax ID).","The River Heights City Planning Commission approved a boundary line adjustment that expands Keegan Ryan’s lot by about 100 feet (roughly 8,500 sq ft). The commission required a recorded survey and that the enlarged parcel remain one tax ID number; applicant said a plat amendment will be recorded though not required by state law.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

River Heights planning commission forwards revised sign code to public hearing Oct. 14

River Heights panel approves kennel permit for Ballard family, requires fenced yard by April

River Heights planning panel approves 100-foot boundary adjustment for commissioner Keegan Ryan