[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6461188,"mediaKeyId","5825663-d97021652ebc1f42cd7bfa1b19bc128f","parentId",5825663,"title","Votes at a glance: committee advances multiple ordinances, resolutions; rejects Hunt Club PMDP amendment","audioSeconds",2430,"startMs",5400000,"endMs",7830000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5825663-d97021652ebc1f42cd7bfa1b19bc128f&start=5400&end=7830","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5825663-d97021652ebc1f42cd7bfa1b19bc128f/thumbnail_5400000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6461188/Gallatin-City/Sumner-County/Tennessee/Votes-at-a-glance-committee-advances-multiple-ordinances-resolutions-rejects-Hunt-Club-PMDP-amendment","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6461188-1c6077c34cd10a302e9caf302bd96100/orig.mp4?Expires=1773078374&Signature=RQrs90GgyYcB2d~5hDYHwYkrO1bvcQpiJHk0a~MEIxFan7gkHAmX6dPtIAWrJeKZIkdv6jKh7IxNaYYbgS8xUzWwdHxVp~oYNJUfWiYDj26byy4xpbezNU0lARz-2Qtk~KJiEiuKzlOEE~adZGhS9w13xFOyzt0BPNIQh3-K0Ef34HfuwjyQ9BIAYyi4bPgMWJtjaYaer5h7EOKusiyZTrbVtza5VAmr-QEbkMGNk423dwvwo0KzI-D83kC-EYPXkAS87xJAAVg4O3uJ0p7ZCL4CZA~TMIrLlRz9TQnuTmjeg3tuQ-QET-HDT7dk2OfzdqJRyN-peav83tM-3jB4OA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Gallatin City, TN","date","2025-09-24T16:57:06.047Z","article","At its Sept. 23 meeting the Gallatin Council Committee acted on a string of ordinances and resolutions, forwarding most items to the full City Council and declining to advance a requested amendment to the Hunt Club preliminary master development plan.

Key outcomes

- Ordinance O02509-50 (appropriation of $5,000 from CSX Transportation Military and First Responder Grant): committee moved the ordinance forward to council (aye recorded). The grant-funded appropriation will be used to purchase equipment for the Gallatin Fire Department.

- Resolution R2509-58 (adopt Public Works mission, vision and values statement for APWA accreditation): forwarded to council with unanimous committee support.

- Ordinance O02509-51 (re-appropriation of carryover funds from prior fiscal year): forwarded to council. Finance staff said carryover projects total several million dollars and departments need the appropriations to complete ongoing work.

- Resolution R2509-59 (initial resolution authorizing notice of intent to issue up to $23,000,000 in general obligation bonds): committee voted to forward the initial resolution; staff explained the public notice will trigger a 20-day protest window required by the state comptroller.

- Resolution R2509-60 (actual bond resolution authorizing issuance and sale of general obligation bonds, not to exceed $23,000,000): committee forwarded the bond resolution; staff said the plan is a 20-year issuance to fund fire and facility projects, traffic signals, parks improvements, an IT recovery site and other capital work.

- Resolution R2509-62 (award of health, vision and dental insurance renewal to Blue Cross Blue Shield): the committee approved forwarding the recommended renewal with negotiated rate adjustments; staff said the renewal increase is within budgeted amounts and no plan design changes were recommended.

- Resolution R2509-66 (approve TIPS as a purchasing cooperative under city purchasing rules): forwarded to council to give departments another procurement cooperative option.

- Ordinance Z2509-47 (amended preliminary master development plan for 1520 Hunt Club Boulevard): after discussion about the site’s long-range designation for office uses and concerns about setting a residential precedent in a commercial corridor, a motion not to move the amendment forward passed on a committee voice vote.

Other personnel and policy items including amendments to personnel and recruitment language, holiday/time-off rules for 56-hour employees in the fire department, and an amendment to military leave language in personnel rules were also forwarded to council for final action.

Vote format and tally: committee motions were taken by voice vote without roll-call tallies in the transcript. At roll call the meeting recorded a quorum and seven members including Mayor Brown were present; the committee recorded unanimous voice approvals for the items it forwarded. The Hunt Club PMDP amendment was not forwarded after discussion and a committee motion to not move it forward received affirmative voice votes.

Provenance: each vote or motion is recorded in the meeting transcript at the time the ordinance or resolution was introduced and when the chair called for the vote; the items listed above reflect the committee’s recorded outcomes during the Sept. 23 meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City of Gallatin","oneSentenceSummary","The Gallatin Council Committee moved several budget, procurement and personnel items to full council and declined to advance a proposed amendment to the Hunt Club preliminary master development plan.","taxTitle","Gallatin City , Sumner County, Tennessee","taxId",52803,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6461192,"Former pro player pitches city-paid sports development post to drive tourism and economic activity",2050,3155000,5205000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5825663-d97021652ebc1f42cd7bfa1b19bc128f&start=3155&end=5205","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5825663-d97021652ebc1f42cd7bfa1b19bc128f/thumbnail_3155000.jpg","/articles/6461192/Gallatin-City/Sumner-County/Tennessee/Former-pro-player-pitches-city-paid-sports-development-post-to-drive-tourism-and-economic-activity","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6461192-74655b6fe71f7d7336ac3527f84b9fb1/orig.mp4?Expires=1773078374&Signature=W6~LcnnZMSzn~QRG~afdO2LgpMjWEnl00NfVJMGDqkm~AdCxnCBPqq~7jpxOlffnjGMczkVtdb8SlY1ZYVnV6X21OJZvkaOlRyKPIPk-7vEYlsjCMDBIpuBBJq~yKt1j~HPn74MdMiS4SUb2eL~Pn5IWBu6BSElcTXTOB6Rql3cwAbd~qFDi4kUrIaculqU1ga0ejfQiTMOaVOftPUecVdBKWPSSn8dtwlzx0EDGpURLZ0RsXnkj41MCq6KuMqJJ-PO5nFC9BrRFaz1Was4fZeYyM6OeBevBFGS4h9R0J0g7X1p8ykdxqkGSQE83aimbdvowqn51TIc3Gtkb-mVFKQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Jeremy Hazelbaker, a former Major League Baseball player, asked the Gallatin Council Committee on Sept. 23 to create a Director of Sports Development to recruit regional and national tournaments, coordinate facilities and attract private investment in sports tourism.

Hazelbaker told the committee the position would recruit events, create partnerships with schools and clubs, and help secure funding and private operators for facilities. “The ask is for a position to be created. That position is gonna be for me to develop Gallatin as a sports destination,” Hazelbaker said. He highlighted examples of mid-sized cities whose sports complexes draw hundreds of thousands to millions of visitors annually and cited estimated potential revenue ranges presented earlier by economic development staff. “One event could easily cover what my salary would be,” he said.

Economic development director Rosemary Bates and staff member Jenna Landstrom framed the pitch by citing comparative data and the region’s proximity to Nashville-area professional teams; Bates said a sports tourism effort could deliver from “$500,000 to $5,000,000 in additional revenue a year” depending on scale. Hazelbaker showed examples from other cities — Frisco, Texas; Westfield, Ind.; Elizabethtown, Ky.; and Sand Mountain Park, Ala. — and said private interest exists for a mixed entertainment/sports development near existing parks.

Council reaction was broadly supportive but cautious. Members asked for a job description, clarity on funding and whether the role would be city staff, a consultant, or a privately funded position. Several councilmembers urged a pilot approach and asked for cost and funding details to come back in writing. Council members also stressed the need to avoid un-funded new positions competing with other department needs.

Outcome: Council asked staff and the proponent to prepare a proposal and recommended returning the item to a work session for further discussion; the group agreed to place a proposal on a future agenda and discussed scheduling it for an October 28 work session to allow staff and department heads to review the concept and funding options.

Why this matters: Sports tourism can generate hotel room nights, restaurant and retail sales and private investment in facilities. Council members emphasized private funding and operating partners should be prioritized to limit direct taxpayer obligations.

Provenance: presentation introduced by Rosemary Bates; Jeremy Hazelbaker’s presentation and council discussion ran from the sports-item introduction through a follow-up staff direction where the council asked for a formal proposal to be returned at a work session.","Jeremy Hazelbaker urged Gallatin to create a Director of Sports Development to recruit tournaments, maximize facility use and attract private investment; council asked staff to return with a formal proposal for a work session in late October.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6461197,"City hears overview of new state Infrastructure Development District laws and their mechanics",2697,374000,3071000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5825663-d97021652ebc1f42cd7bfa1b19bc128f&start=374&end=3071","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5825663-d97021652ebc1f42cd7bfa1b19bc128f/thumbnail_374000.jpg","/articles/6461197/Gallatin-City/Sumner-County/Tennessee/City-hears-overview-of-new-state-Infrastructure-Development-District-laws-and-their-mechanics","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6461197-73544e0217e8b81728feed2faaf468cb/orig.mp4?Expires=1773078374&Signature=LG-h4bW0CEjVaXQuyoulHuAn9rye1bi19lQ~Fw4aGrivQCUbyGqwZy-iT1f~DOndxbiF8nJPHMTVBgM82w4NtfVcInJFSuOJbSnbOdLZopM~q3E4UQJf4o7Fz4THqiYpdSWRGMqkVq42uYiOx~R4MSKmdW4skLOnWWehORdYULHAguL5M8TIh5n1dS8izfaMZdt-sWNeoiPPB6V2Y8wED8Y0grtnsLsbzBHd7-1zHiQCA~CC2h4Xp1xCukP~XZ00qnUB0arPb4kA6uPc7jMgAJ34BYPHENfjZO9OVrGPInMazm4PvWN-0U1gqrf58d8EQB0lQFQlTs3RhFD-E0Mg~g__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","City of Gallatin officials on Sept. 23 heard from legal counsel about two new Tennessee statutes that allow developers to form Infrastructure Development Districts (IDDs) to fund public infrastructure through a special assessment on property within a district rather than general city taxation.

Attorney Jim Murphy of the Bradley Law Firm told the Gallatin Council Committee the 2024 statute and a related 2025 statute create a “special assessment district” mechanism that permits issuance of bonds or notes to pay for infrastructure and then levies an annual assessment on properties in the district to service that debt. “It basically is a special assessment that is assessed on all the property within the district, and then that money is used to pay for the public infrastructure,” Murphy said.

Murphy said the 2024 act required a district to be at least five acres, have at least $5 million in planned capital costs and ensure at least half the district area is residential. The petition establishing a district must be signed by the developer and the owners of all parcels inside the proposed boundaries and must include a name (containing “Infrastructure Development District”), the host municipality, parcel list, a site development plan and an estimated infrastructure cost and proposed levy rate. After filing, the host municipality must hold a public hearing 30–45 days later and approve the petition by resolution. The municipality may authorize issuance of bonds directly or delegate issuance to an industrial development board or public building authority; bond terms cannot exceed 30 years.

Murphy described three practical features municipalities and developers should expect: (1) the assessment lien generally ranks behind state, county and municipal property taxes but ahead of typical mortgages or mechanics’ liens; (2) local policy or procedural rules can require disclosures to buyers (Knox County adopted language that requires sales contracts to state a special assessment will be imposed); and (3) penalties and oversight — the statute allows a 1% monthly penalty for delinquent assessments and requires an annual audit of the special assessment fund by the state comptroller.

He contrasted the 2025 law, labeled the Real Estate Infrastructure Development District act, which removed the 5-acre and $5 million minimums, removed the 50% residential-area requirement, allows commercial projects as well as residential, and explicitly permits bond proceeds to fund impact fees. “The 2025 act is much more flexible from the standpoint of which projects can use it,” Murphy said.

Council members asked how petitions work, who qualifies as a developer, whether the city’s credit or bond rating is implicated, and what happens if assessments do not generate enough revenue. Murphy said landowners can be petitioning developers if they can provide the required infrastructure plan and cost estimates, but in practice single large developers typically sponsor these petitions. He said the bonds are typically revenue bonds payable from special assessments and need not be backed by the city’s full faith and credit — that option exists but is an affirmative pledge that the city must approve. He added private lender protections and developer guarantees are commonly part of the financing.

Council members also pressed on consumer disclosure, prepayment options, phasing, and administrative costs. Murphy and staff said municipalities can adopt policies and procedures to require developer disclosures at sale, to set prepayment rules, and to cap administrative costs (Murphy noted administrative costs can be capped by local policy and later referenced a 5% administrative-cost cap in discussion). Several council members expressed skepticism that IDDs will reduce market prices for homes, with one member noting developer behavior and broader construction costs will still influence final sale prices.

Why this matters: IDDs change how infrastructure for new development can be financed and shift the immediate financing mechanism from private mortgages or developer-paid up-front costs to a public bond-and-assessment structure. That can lower the financing rate for infrastructure (Murphy noted tax-exempt bond financing typically carries a lower interest rate than mortgage financing), but also creates long-term assessment obligations attached to property and potential project risk if lots do not sell.

Council next steps and local controls: Murphy repeatedly emphasized that under state law the legislative body retains final discretion; local councils can (but are not required to) adopt detailed policies and procedures for when and how they would consider IDD petitions. Staff recommended the council consider an initial set of minimum policies and to require project-specific policies for early cases while the city learns from other jurisdictions.

Provenance: first discussion of IDDs in the meeting packet and presentation began with the mayor’s introduction of the topic and Rosemary Bates. The committee’s Q&A and staff remarks followed the Bradley Law Firm presentation and concluded before the meeting moved to a sports-tourism presentation.","Legal and financial consultants briefed the Gallatin Council Committee on two recent Tennessee laws that let developers create Infrastructure Development Districts, explaining petition rules, eligible costs, levy methods and differences between the 2024 and 2025 statutes.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Votes at a glance: committee advances multiple ordinances, resolutions; rejects Hunt Club PMDP amendment

Former pro player pitches city-paid sports development post to drive tourism and economic activity

City hears overview of new state Infrastructure Development District laws and their mechanics