[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6702728,"mediaKeyId","5825774-ece888a5e43b25278c4f702718d0d8a5","parentId",5825774,"title","Board affirms revocation of vacation‑rental permit at 380 Andrea Drive after underage‑drinking incident and ID failures","audioSeconds",4269,"startMs",2391000,"endMs",6660000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5825774-ece888a5e43b25278c4f702718d0d8a5&start=2391&end=6660","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5825774-ece888a5e43b25278c4f702718d0d8a5/thumbnail_2391000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6702728/Douglas-County/Nevada/Board-affirms-revocation-of-vacationrental-permit-at-380-Andrea-Drive-after-underagedrinking-incident-and-ID-failures","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6702728-de444cfc0ebbc5c97f8f6ee81cde0e30/orig.mp4?Expires=1770298496&Signature=dcGfAbsl9LX1Hnp7PS6DrVHskWAdaPgvlB6F72laLB9viWR52Wa-5VaCKxhqttPdskh4HH1aWtfPws3jEBtk08vWlhSQ9lalGVlwJ53AV4lrHhd1PPtsw4iofcc7XdTBZEk7v6QCcz-OnTGcASkXpJvWbswhIv7jikxd-hFBzXNiAS2D6D9UGVRG~xap3~FbFVphGUAgpC6Ep4jpYm6dsnZFFUvVlxfA9xMqxuD4mptMyJpxq04vLH6pbRFSSFvMKnTS~co0HrYTKCTiwelo4a0cm-QoQmwC0H3RoIbgcXdX4IhZfZj5sPGVUqv9Vv2XidyjuqXDqPJzTO5I2~Cq0w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Douglas County, NV","date","2025-09-24T22:02:57.453Z","article","The Douglas County Vacation Home Rental Advisory Board voted 3‑to‑1 to affirm the county’s revocation of the vacation‑home rental permit for 380 Andrea Drive after county staff presented evidence that deputies found underage occupants and that the owner did not obtain required identification or a renter registry.

Ernie Strangler summarized the county’s case: the VHR permit for 380 Andrea allows three bedrooms, four parking spaces and a maximum overnight occupancy of eight. On July 5, deputies responded to a complaint and found five male occupants who admitted to being underage; three were cited for minor consumption after a preliminary breath test, Strangler said. County staff concluded the owner failed to obtain photo identification for renters as required by the VHR code and that renting to underage occupants and failing to verify age contributed to an “egregious health and safety” violation.

Strangler read applicable VHR code provisions into the record, including owner responsibilities to obtain renter contact information, to verify renters are at least 25 years old, and the requirement that an owner who commits two substantial violations within 12 months may face suspension or revocation.

A representative for the owners acknowledged the incident and urged the board to consider it an isolated episode caused by guest misrepresentation. The representative told the board, “we acknowledge the violation … and we do take full responsibility,” and described steps taken since the incident to tighten procedures: requiring guests to sign a comprehensive acknowledgment of VHR rules, storing government IDs, and adding third‑party ID verification and additional noise monitoring.

Public commenters who live near the property told the board they had observed frequent rentals, noise and parking conflicts. Mike, who said he lives directly across from the house, said the property owners have been “excellent” neighbors but that the weekend in question had “young men partying all weekend long.” Vaughn Reems and other neighbors told the board they want stronger enforcement to prevent underage drinking and reduce rental density.

Board members debated whether the episode should count as multiple violations and whether the lack of a local, compliant emergency contact and failure to maintain renter ID records justified revocation. One board member said the core enforcement issue was the owner’s failure to verify renter age; another emphasized the cumulative noncompliance (no ID copies retained, unclear local contact) that increased the risk to neighbors.

A motion to affirm the county’s revocation passed 3‑to‑1. The board’s action confirms the county’s revocation of the VHR permit for 380 Andrea Drive; the record does not show an additional civil penalty in the board motion, but staff had recommended revocation based on code violations recorded in the packet.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","VHR Advisory Board | September 24, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Vacation Home Rental Advisory Board affirmed the county’s revocation of the VHR permit for 380 Andrea Drive, citing a sheriff’s report that deputies found underage occupants and county findings that the owner failed to verify renter age and maintain required renter records.","taxTitle","Douglas County, Nevada","taxId",56916,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6702732,"Douglas County board upholds revocation of vacation‑rental permit at 342 Maryann Drive",1850,495000,2345000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5825774-ece888a5e43b25278c4f702718d0d8a5&start=495&end=2345","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5825774-ece888a5e43b25278c4f702718d0d8a5/thumbnail_495000.jpg","/articles/6702732/Douglas-County/Nevada/Douglas-County-board-upholds-revocation-of-vacationrental-permit-at-342-Maryann-Drive","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6702732-c176751f4bfbec00d1bea4990cc75e74/orig.mp4?Expires=1770298496&Signature=J02TKrECl3o21kjc3uszbdnP3Snm1X73YVTJoWnoD1Tfayjx7CQy1GWnzzRdAzI4drMCOlxAEgw7ZwfWv44aV8hYgvnVunnfcAZwS50RR3HroTmJvdIhV2YUM7gHxkcqLk~DkQgP1vHwQI7ykRQV-MuUJJOxSA-HQImJlXoib7F8LoMb2u73VofVUxgeens5u0hW~X8nvDWGPZYlxEQh94vhl8omCxZPz~Q8P3xrQ43jjqs4kk4Qr5lqI7uNET8hiZ~2~pIVlGtbZNWXxqIPRSCovj6~Rxix-uk3y0goRpoCNUZeMrAxXoFV~AxfbFZdBssrgOzZXUB9gaxS9WmNMg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Douglas County Vacation Home Rental Advisory Board on Monday affirmed the county’s decision to revoke the vacation‑home rental permit for 342 Maryann Drive and upheld civil penalties tied to repeated noise complaints and a failure to respond as the designated local contact.

County code enforcement presented a timeline of complaints and contacts that led to the revocation. Ernie Strangler, for the record, summarized that the property held a valid VHR permit for seven bedrooms, six parking spaces and a maximum overnight occupancy of 10. Strangler said a late‑night noise complaint on Aug. 17 prompted attempts to reach the owner’s listed emergency contact; the county did not receive a response within the required 30 minutes and assessed a $2,500 penalty, which was paid. He said later noise complaints and a confirmed sheriff’s office response led to a second substantial violation and the revocation notice.

“Pursuant to Douglas County code sections … the VHR owner must use best efforts to ensure that renters or guests of the vacation home rental do not create unreasonable noise or disturbances,” Strangler told the board, citing the VHR code provisions read into the record.

Neighbors described repeated disturbances at the property. Lisa Hori, who said she called the hotline on July 12, told the board the July incident “sounded like a fraternity house party” and said she appreciated that the VHR hotline allowed her to report the problem. Jim McIntyre said he recorded the noise to show how loud it was, testifying the recording “did a valid recording.” Vaughn Reems and Dirk Yurisich described recurring noise and parking problems that reach across the neighborhood.

Board members discussed whether the appeal complied with the code’s appeal‑filing requirements and whether additional material filed after the appeal should be considered. AJ (counsel) noted the appeal form listed constitutional and vagueness claims but provided little factual detail to define the scope of review. The board voted to find the appellant had standing and later voted to affirm the county decision upholding the revocation and the associated penalties.

A motion to affirm the county’s decision was moved by a board member and seconded; the board recorded the outcome as an affirmative vote with three yes votes and no votes recorded against the motion. The record shows the civil penalties were assessed at $2,500 per violation; county staff said the assessed amount in this matter had been paid.

The board’s action ends the advisory process unless the appellant pursues other administrative or legal remedies. Board members and several neighbors urged stronger local contact procedures and clearer verification practices to limit recurrence.","The Douglas County Vacation Home Rental Advisory Board affirmed the county's revocation of the VHR permit for 342 Maryann Drive and the associated penalties after hearing code‑enforcement findings and public complaints about repeated late‑night noise and failure to timely respond as the local contact.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Board affirms revocation of vacation‑rental permit at 380 Andrea Drive after underage‑drinking incident and ID failures

Douglas County board upholds revocation of vacation‑rental permit at 342 Maryann Drive