[{"_1":2,"_87":-5,"_88":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6460776,"mediaKeyId","5827649-5da7a6674816d77e7d3461134cdd0862","parentId",5827649,"title","Historic 1927 house at 500 Nassau St. cleared for restoration with conditions, board removes decorative brackets","audioSeconds",2421,"startMs",3982180,"endMs",6404050,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5827649-5da7a6674816d77e7d3461134cdd0862&start=3982&end=6404","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5827649-5da7a6674816d77e7d3461134cdd0862/thumbnail_3982180.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6460776/Venice/Sarasota-County/Florida/Historic-1927-house-at-500-Nassau-St-cleared-for-restoration-with-conditions-board-removes-decorative-brackets","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6460776-0c1e537b92e0aaf0e4e41d62cb81e44c/orig.mp4?Expires=1770487675&Signature=k43rQ73c7kIA0myBiZHqgG2KXj-hFH-tuoHq-tONeHy7AkaNOK9chucBUjRwClfyEwDwkH-~2QxWDP--FXttimgyqy34D-T~~GpZt-otKwGJCcQabjlNBSq6Kf5K9SXdGPuqUx-WlFesJVg286lWS-xPwOttP1FhnTu9QKB49OmdSLz6mFc4NFTsZCMx~wqoVTd39Rt7L1~CRs0cYHftv5iRduyk9rDnlvR5p2iEbVzcZBjzXopJoNvMh2bCSAVYCbunw3vID-0CRbjK-HtlmzqP5EsOaucSaNEdLuh~SleAsIp1EhU9vQY-ATw5yr4h5ePgbc~2BD2e8hZVIMqtQw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Venice","date","2025-09-25T00:00:00Z","article","The Venice Historic Architectural Preservation Board on Aug. 28 approved PLAR25‑00265, a certificate of architectural compliance to renovate a 1927 single‑family home and rebuild a nonoriginal carriage house at 500 Nassau Street, with conditions that adjust some decorative details and authorize staff to approve minor revisions.

Nicole Tremblay, senior planner for the City of Venice, described the proposal as removal of two nonoriginal features, repair of stucco, replacement of roofing and windows, and construction of a new second‑story connector between the main house and the carriage house. Tremblay said the property lies in the Venetian theme Architectural Control District and that the packet included elevations, historic photos and material specifications. \"You all have seen this recently for a local register nomination,\" Tremblay said, noting the local register nomination had received first reading and was scheduled for a second reading before City Council in October.

Harry Klinkhammer, the city's historical resources manager, told the board his review found the proposed work would not jeopardize eligibility for the local register and that the plan \"meets the Secretary of the Interior's standards\" as applied at this stage. Klinkhammer also clarified that the existing garage/carriage house is not original to the 1927 construction.

Sam Hardy of BB Design Studio presented the design and the restoration approach on behalf of owner Michael Jerriman. Hardy described efforts to recreate character‑defining features visible in historic photographs, including French‑casement steel‑frame window profiles and a modest privacy wall at the front yard. The owner and applicant said the project aims to restore original fenestration where evidence exists and to use restrained ornamental detailing consistent with Venice precedent.

During board review members asked for several clarifications: confirm the existing vent above two living‑room windows would remain; simplify railing designs; and remove two small tiled decorative brackets beneath a proposed balcony (described in the record as \"eyebrow brackets\"). Staff recommended the board could approve the project and allow staff to finalize minor adjustments without returning to the board.

The board voted on a motion to approve PLAR25‑00265 as presented with revisions to the north elevation and a requirement that the eyebrow brackets on the garage be eliminated; the motion also authorized staff to approve minor changes. Roll call recorded four affirmative votes (Miss Derryberry; Mister Barrick; Miss Trammell; Mister Watkins). Chair Beebe had recused earlier in the item because of a family conflict; the vice chair presided for the vote.

Next steps: the owner may proceed with permits consistent with the approved elevations and the staff‑approved refinements. City Council's second reading on the property's local register nomination is expected in October; the certificate of architectural compliance was granted independent of the final local‑register action.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Venice - Historic and Architectural Preservation Board on 2025-09-25 9:00 AM","oneSentenceSummary","The Venice Historic Architectural Preservation Board approved a certificate of architectural compliance for renovation and addition at 500 Nassau Street, requiring removal of decorative eyebrow brackets and delegating minor revisions to staff for final approval.","taxTitle","Venice, Sarasota County, Florida","taxId",56285,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6460780,"Historic preservation board continues review of proposed 3‑story mixed‑use building at 256 S. Nokomis Ave.",3706,179320,3886194,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5827649-5da7a6674816d77e7d3461134cdd0862&start=179&end=3886","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5827649-5da7a6674816d77e7d3461134cdd0862/thumbnail_179320.jpg","/articles/6460780/Venice/Sarasota-County/Florida/Historic-preservation-board-continues-review-of-proposed-3story-mixeduse-building-at-256-S-Nokomis-Ave","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6460780-4062f6724076c8a6d268e78dad1f895e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770487675&Signature=it4vkTmpEI7NGSW2LfTxNImpYXb~LMC0Qf6puZh6KDduloT5emy~NyrVcdMbX9y~SUu1KM3ukaQTOUPb2l9KBOvlFBkfIFrQ~hjDfgVQsTz~~7ZWWeGBF1VY5H5r6N~6gkZY7thChIY3-tiHRI8ItUHQ98MZ1Wf8MRB2o2mD6z8kvsUPtC6vMJgcBW64Lg7eSc2Ioqt-lJWcrpwU3Gr14ugOlsDzEiHUPoRfK95vUg3cB1EoNjTd3P7ca2JzrsD4PRjhNpmSEmqqQIWWXXEZTYySvsDOYcdudY7SYDSCQ-BobFwQZBJlCCos4L8zX8TlMc~Nj77T1exR0SOQBA8XMQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Venice Historic Architectural Preservation Board on Aug. 28 continued consideration of PLAR25‑00193, a proposal to demolish an existing single‑story commercial building and construct a three‑story, predominantly residential mixed‑use structure with two ground‑floor nonresidential units at 256 South Nokomis Avenue. The board set a date certain for continued review on Oct. 9, 2025.

City planner Britney Smith summarized the application and materials on file, saying the parcel is about 0.37 acres, is zoned South Trail 1 and lies in the Venetian theme Architectural Control District. \"For the record, I have signed a speaker's card, and I'm a planner with the city of Venice,\" Smith said as she explained the package and the elements the board should review.

The applicant, Becca Solazi of bDesign LLC, described the design intention as Venetian in character and said the roofline would be a parapet rather than a traditional barrel tile roof. \"It's gonna be [a] Venetian style parapet on top of the roof,\" Solazi said, explaining the project includes tower elements at the corners and parapet moldings intended to screen rooftop equipment.

Board members pressed the applicant on visual massing, the proportion of tower moldings and the lack of offsets in the primary facades. Multiple members said the proposed corner towers and the parapet molding — shown in drawings as roughly 6 feet 11 7/8 inches (about 7 feet) above the roof — made the building read as taller and more vertical than surrounding properties. One board member recommended reducing the parapet height by about 3 feet or using a barrel tile roof, saying those changes would reduce the perceived height even if the floor‑to‑floor building height remains similar. The board also requested additional depth or plane changes in the facades — for example, recessed balcony volumes or 16‑inch minimum offsets that break the long vertical plane — and asked for refinements to window proportions and railing details to better match Venice historic precedent.

Arthur Sawall, who identified himself as the owner, urged the board to consider the three‑dimensional renderings when assessing depth, saying the balconies produce visual variation not always evident on two‑dimensional elevations. Appearing alongside Solazi, he said the team could provide alternative schemes. Planner Smith and staff noted that zoning and structural dimensions (including setback, maximum height and parking) already had been through technical review committees and the planning commission process; Smith also confirmed that the site is outside the Downtown Edge and in the South Trail 1 zone.

Planning director Roger Clark advised the board and applicant on scheduling and advertising rules for continuances. Clark said the board could set a date certain and, because the public hearing was already advertised, the item could be continued to Oct. 9 without re‑advertising. The applicant indicated they could provide revisions for the Oct. 9 meeting.

The board formally continued PLAR25‑00193 to Oct. 9, 2025. A roll call vote recorded the continuance as approved (yes: Mister Watkins; Miss Trammell; Mister Barrick; Miss Derryberry; Chair Beebe). The record showed one piece of written correspondence from Katie Flynn of 444 Darling Street but no members of the public spoke at the hearing.

Next steps: the applicant will return to the board on Oct. 9 with revised elevations and renderings that address parapet/massing, facade offsets, window proportions and simplified railings. Staff will coordinate a date certain with the city to avoid re‑advertising.","The Venice Historic Architectural Preservation Board continued review of a proposed three‑story, Venetian‑themed mixed‑use building at 256 South Nokomis Avenue to Oct. 9 after lengthy discussion about massing, parapet height and façade details.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Historic 1927 house at 500 Nassau St. cleared for restoration with conditions, board removes decorative brackets

Historic preservation board continues review of proposed 3‑story mixed‑use building at 256 S. Nokomis Ave.