During the Costa Mesa Planning Commission meeting on September 22, 2025, a significant discussion centered around the Ohio House, a sober living facility, and its request for a reasonable accommodation to continue operating without a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The facility, which has been a topic of contention due to its proximity to another group home, is seeking to clarify its status as a single housekeeping unit under city regulations.

The Ohio House is located near a Circle K convenience store and has been described as having no significant proximity issues with the neighboring group home, despite being within 650 feet. Advocates for the Ohio House argued that the residents are not transient but rather individuals committed to sobriety, often staying for extended periods. They emphasized that the residents share communal activities and support each other, which is essential for their recovery process.

A key point raised during the meeting was the distinction between group homes and business operations. Proponents argued that the Ohio House should be classified as a residence, not a business, as it operates on a nonprofit basis and provides a structured living environment for individuals in recovery. They highlighted that the city’s own guidelines recognize group homes as residential entities, which should not be subjected to the same regulations as commercial businesses.

The discussion also touched on the broader context of housing availability in Costa Mesa. Advocates pointed out that the city has seen a reduction in sober living homes, which has created a pressing need for such facilities. They argued that denying the Ohio House's request could lead to the displacement of residents who have established their lives in the community.

In response to questions from the commissioners, it was clarified that the request for a reasonable accommodation was necessary to allow the Ohio House to continue operating without a CUP, which would be unattainable due to the proximity issue. The advocates expressed a willingness to comply with city regulations if granted the necessary exceptions.

As the meeting concluded, the implications of the commission's decision were clear: the outcome could significantly affect the lives of current residents at the Ohio House and the availability of sober living options in Costa Mesa. The commission is expected to deliberate on the request in the coming weeks, weighing the needs of the community against regulatory frameworks.