[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",5973062,"mediaKeyId","5833727-9ccf848fa580cae1ee3925adf3a42828","parentId",5833727,"title","Commission moves 1377 Bridal Road duplex from conceptual review to action","audioSeconds",439,"startMs",6206000,"endMs",6645000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5833727-9ccf848fa580cae1ee3925adf3a42828&start=6206&end=6645","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5833727-9ccf848fa580cae1ee3925adf3a42828/thumbnail_6206000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/5973062/Ohio/Commission-moves-1377-Bridal-Road-duplex-from-conceptual-review-to-action","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5973062-781695b732c42e103241c55f6086cbd9/orig.mp4?Expires=1770404284&Signature=fiJZd5bTcpps6gmk~K0~I2za3~67ZxgmHjyd~vcDiguSay0DOhMu8HwxVpOcJpWr-FsGRFQQTJlIGX1wctTzuTfmRSMNS0wmqDH0CXMBsMsITLtjgiuzE4QuWBHh4IGTY~~uACMn06kRt8ALd1Yj9CMIEw~0V7ViYMwdsX-8CSovwbCzfU97EFwwfTaM~I4VrXOeHtrmBaX26xHkrzyLPHZZ9ihx4wGedAa-Nyj3mpZ4ILJkkthpunrBfsUBGYx0e003JyZGhiX4dTpq6zLrjhWCBMD99hb-s85mQH0Ddsy82Mvm8QzUazVzw3Rl7FbEIPf14xjFZ-lEVO92zdQI8w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Columbus","date","2025-09-26T16:46:14.26Z","article","The Historic Resources Commission voted to advance the 1377 Bridal Road duplex application from conceptual review to action after the design team provided updated materials showing a reduced building footprint and a revised lot-coverage calculation. The applicants adjusted massing and footprint incrementally to reduce impervious coverage and address earlier commissioner concerns.

The project is a proposed two-unit building with separate front and rear access areas and two rear yards. The design team said the lot-coverage figure had been recalculated and reduced to approximately 46'48 percent using the city's current method for building footprint calculations; the design updates included modest plan changes to shorten the building length and refine unit layouts. Commissioners said the updated packet was clear and that the documentation was sufficient to move the application to the action stage; staff noted any required zoning variances had been or would be addressed through the separate variance/permit process.

By moving the application to action, the applicant will proceed with the materials and documentation necessary for final HRC action and for building-permit review. Commissioners did not record additional conditions within the public hearing, but staff will continue to coordinate submittal requirements for a full action hearing or permit review.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","Special Meeting: Historic Resources Commission (09/18/25)","oneSentenceSummary","After reviewing updated materials, the Historic Resources Commission moved the 1377 Bridal Road duplex application from conceptual review to action, noting a reduced building footprint and updated lot-coverage calculations.","taxTitle","Columbus City Council, Columbus, Franklin County, Ohio","taxId",75950,"location","Ohio","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},5973067,"Architects present major rear addition at 157 Rustic Place; commission offers positive feedback and requests details",1720,4376000,6096000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5833727-9ccf848fa580cae1ee3925adf3a42828&start=4376&end=6096","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5833727-9ccf848fa580cae1ee3925adf3a42828/thumbnail_4376000.jpg","/articles/5973067/Ohio/Architects-present-major-rear-addition-at-157-Rustic-Place-commission-offers-positive-feedback-and-requests-details","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5973067-4aed248ecc5defe7aac9e8dfa22ec3af/orig.mp4?Expires=1770404284&Signature=OfkRydSNzBnB329qUNTlUoH3v1536gNmezemaK6F8nE1FVEURvcIwAYgf1rT2H~Y6tCWtfU5glxb1kFiZmQfkcJ4zIYhE4RBmo86e3TfuMyHBDasu6EFv5YPpAm31jLJndUOCFVBVvCFCIOjw24atJX6Wxo79DwaFPcOc36PowrZOmKcVTTZfIRgt27LncEyDnBZ9HAmd5NgWqznaXNkorNN4hGMFRrluD8pNop9RS90Rs2CC3yzJmtYRRxweGxmDglC-M19f4dYbtjS2vfkP70oPtJe2Z4C3r8ZWvDOTm6ne7q4TQadVNEUP26NPv9Eq1ZST2m18pmGe3zDr-mL2w__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Rogers Kraniak Architects presented a conceptual plan for a two-story addition, replacement windows and a reconfigured rear porch at 157 Rustic Place. Commissioners gave generally positive feedback on form and materials but asked the team for more-detailed documentation before final approval, including a window schedule, material samples and a landscape plan.

The proposal calls for a single-and two-story addition, a covered porch with an arched standing-seam metal roof echoing the house's dormer shapes, replacement of deteriorated cedar shakes with 12-inch-exposure cedar to match existing, and new Marvin Ultimate casement windows to match previously installed units. The design includes composite decking and railing material (the applicant brought TimberTech product samples) and proposes cultured or matched stone piers to tie the addition to the original house.

Commissioners asked the applicants to provide a window-by-window package (rough opening dimensions, product cut sheets and detailed section drawings), photos documenting existing historic steel-sash windows and a landscape plan showing proposed foundation plantings and how the porch skirting will be treated during construction. Staff also asked for product data for deck cap rails, composite facing and the proposed stone so commissioners can evaluate visual texture and color.

Commissioners said the addition's volumes and sympathetic detailing were appropriate and recommended that the applicant proceed to a formal submission with the requested materials. The commission did not vote on final approval at the hearing; it offered design guidance and asked the applicants to return with the requested documentation.","Architects outlined a two-story rear addition, sunroom and deck at 157 Rustic Place. Commissioners praised the concept but asked for a window-by-window package, landscape plan and product samples (TimberTech composite railing, stone, copper gutters) before a final vote.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},5973072,"Commission continues review of window and exterior work at 204 East Oakland Avenue, asks for design details",977,2801000,3778000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5833727-9ccf848fa580cae1ee3925adf3a42828&start=2801&end=3778","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5833727-9ccf848fa580cae1ee3925adf3a42828/thumbnail_2801000.jpg","/articles/5973072/Ohio/Commission-continues-review-of-window-and-exterior-work-at-204-East-Oakland-Avenue-asks-for-design-details","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5973072-238af2f5111ac5520b92110a3467a8c7/orig.mp4?Expires=1770404284&Signature=QX7qOOnY6mcxgRsI1aSgwThqEDz7JN7OXmRBrFZBru6tl8-adeXAk8cUzdEjm2KL-sn6uX2rRZZZ-qI~dj2TRS22FnTxeXQoen0zTIWlIvxD~MrvVtH0vMaolHfjGYpWcr3vFNfiVjr0wqnrFje55~rbSqN0LuBZAXsLxx9zvcG7b3Vnp1pejfQfL3RwHZHKWHqRQTRbmkN-e6VciRhFayHJH6BsxpmZA-vKM8rrWvkKquzMNBN0VO2kZjqP8n8m6DjzH-GYXogVBllDNmdql3W8hAp81xxtRgqxbVoKVMunSJPFBePPy3o-Qsr~eRYUXXi~31uMLDUWx89UzBq~ow__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Historic Resources Commission continued an application for multiple exterior alterations at 204 East Oakland Avenue, citing unresolved concerns about dormer proportions, the appearance of new casement windows and certain trim and flashing details. Staff recommended continuation to allow the applicant time to provide precise drawings and material samples so commissioners can evaluate solutions that retain the house's historic character while addressing safety and egress needs.

The applicant and their representative described three potential fixes for a dormer window that currently contains a casement: adding an interior meeting rail, adding an exterior meeting rail, or offsetting inner and outer meeting rails to create the visual appearance of a double-hung window while preserving casement operability for egress. Commissioners advised the applicant to present a framing or 'picture-frame' detail that runs fully around the opening so the retrofit reads as a single, cohesive unit from the street.

Other outstanding items the commission asked the applicant to address include: removing or proposing historically proportionate shutters (staff noted the existing shutters are nonhistoric and have left sun-staining where they were attached), revising flashing so it does not wrap down the face of the dormer, and providing 2D drawings or a small mock-up showing proposed meeting-rail depth and sightlines. Staff also recommended the applicant provide product cut sheets for proposed windows (the applicant said they planned to use Marvin Ultimate windows to match other replacements on the house), and to submit photos of the interior and exterior condition of existing steel-sash windows to document repairability.

The commission encouraged the applicant to return with simple hand drawings or field mock-ups if necessary; commissioners said those materials would help them evaluate whether the proposed retrofit properly replicates surrounding proportions and retains the building's character. The application was continued to allow time to gather the requested drawings, samples and photos.","The Historic Resources Commission continued consideration of window replacements, dormer detailing and exterior alterations at 204 East Oakland Avenue and instructed the applicant to submit detailed drawings, window mock-ups or meeting-rail options, product cut sheets and photos documenting existing conditions.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},5973077,"Commission approves 7-foot fence for North Fourth Street auto shop with conditions",1245,1505000,2750000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5833727-9ccf848fa580cae1ee3925adf3a42828&start=1505&end=2750","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5833727-9ccf848fa580cae1ee3925adf3a42828/thumbnail_1505000.jpg","/articles/5973077/Ohio/Commission-approves-7-foot-fence-for-North-Fourth-Street-auto-shop-with-conditions","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5973077-9fa831047fd21593f6d0105a22f7320e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770404284&Signature=SEiq2QmnqTYyY0d-yGAMyKfuKRVRKi7U1i4IU7F4ZJvuCdvA5YbEFC9~kyETWgnrhx~kpkiUABxYD7z2lnugYr-9DwRmQfBrP8NBJlEH9jIa46nCov5CGUqbc7aNpakaI0Wz5z07hZOQrbYGuc~yC1leaYxnVYFmgoRsidTKB~lz6Q-pW4Fk2-RMYHZGYTTX3lGnM5qpGQsax3UfQAQgbNq0cMZ0TzVEMD3gmwtO44-qY9DaamJrdV1Wz-oSv0dDEKR8emLZsxE6tEj1RfIc0nuYdl1CO2T4Dii-N9EzIGyGuH1-hzLONK~7gWDCCrIe~yFG6K4Nc03D3OvznxR57A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Historic Resources Commission voted to approve a 7-foot-high black aluminum perimeter fence at 1550 North Fourth Street after hearing extended testimony from the property owner about repeated break-ins and property damage. The commission acknowledged local precedents and the commercial nature of the site in the district and attached conditions to the approval requiring the applicant to submit final product specifications.

Staff had recommended reducing the fence to 6 feet to meet standard code (City code 306.13) and the HRC's typical guidance. The applicant, property owner Ho Thong Chi, described three break-ins, multiple acts of vandalism and a large insurance cost increase — and urged that the extra height was a security necessity. He also showed photos of nearby fences and said he had spoken with zoning staff and with a neighborhood commission about the request.

Commissioners discussed security, precedent and visual impact in the historic district. One commissioner said 6 feet might not be sufficient in the applicant's experience; another noted that approval of a taller fence should be limited to this specific context, given the property's commercial use, corner location and evidence of repeated criminal activity. The commission also asked for a final design choice: the applicant selected a model shown in the materials and agreed the fence as installed would omit two intermediate horizontal rails so the approved design will include only a top rail and a bottom rail (the applicant identified the desired model as the same design used at a nearby expo center).

The commission's approval included conditions that the applicant submit final product cut sheets, the selected fence model (noted as the UAS-100 style in the hearing materials, to be verified in the submittal) and a contractor's specification sheet before permits are issued. The applicant said the cost difference between 6 and 7 feet was small and that he had lost significant revenue to vandalism and theft; he told the commission, \"the higher, the safer I get.\" The commission approved the application with the stated conditions and asked staff to verify the final submitted materials matched the version shown at the hearing.

Next steps: the applicant must provide the specified product sheets and final elevations to staff; staff will confirm conformance before permitting.","The Historic Resources Commission approved a 7-foot black aluminum perimeter fence for an auto business at 1550 North Fourth Street, citing security hardships and local precedents; the approval requires final product submittals and limits on the fence picket configuration.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},5973082,"Historic commissioners approve most work at 138 East Oakland Avenue but defer concrete patio",1299,146000,1445000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5833727-9ccf848fa580cae1ee3925adf3a42828&start=146&end=1445","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5833727-9ccf848fa580cae1ee3925adf3a42828/thumbnail_146000.jpg","/articles/5973082/Ohio/Historic-commissioners-approve-most-work-at-138-East-Oakland-Avenue-but-defer-concrete-patio","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5973082-d9be601d19c2474a83963fd4aac77939/orig.mp4?Expires=1770404285&Signature=FIKVz-N7-esop6rZWYWn-RHpvZAz-fOdekTuC9OMa8SOPxDFmQXdOiVwL3dIL22WqTWFUnud6N1rZ6xxOaFQvnFaqrsbYIz5RMXWmAUoKuFCV8InAWRvEbyLHjhUsw~6FjGXb5yspZTiQvuAA3aFwA9aEj-Rkh2HHJRqHr2U4~OA~e2bJtqcE8Ql9T08fgoAYupPF7hz3UijxMw~~G9cRI0f8UKMO5QNs9sCdkpXwnIv3hfHq605hga1f5b1D5IExvlUqScHt2cfjKU3GhEndMS3J4Iw5T0IOF3tNL3e-CzK2ZPexRppf9zkY9rM5lgGrD4-A6qz5gq8mmwj2CpehA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Historic Resources Commission on Sept. 1 approved most exterior site work at 138 East Oakland Avenue but deferred a decision on the applicant's requested solid concrete patio, asking the owners to provide more information and to work with staff before the commission's Oct. 2 business meeting. Staff and commissioners said city guidance favors permeable pavers or other permeable surfaces for stormwater management, and they asked the applicants to show why a nonpermeable patio is necessary.

The split decision follows staff's recommendation that the application comply with the commission's guidance for site improvements and the city's alteration standards. Staff told the commission the proposal to replace existing sidewalks and most site elements is consistent with the code, but the large concrete patio in the rear would require an exception because it expands impermeable surface area.

At the hearing, owners Mary and Mike Steele described an ongoing basement drainage problem and said the contractor proposed regrading and French drains; they also said they have spent about $25,000 on the project so far and that some of the existing pavers are cracked and on a poor base. Commissioners acknowledged those concerns but said cost and convenience alone do not meet the usual criteria for an exception from the permeable-surface preference. One commissioner said a permeable solution might even improve the drainage problem by allowing stormwater to infiltrate rather than flow toward neighboring yards.

After discussion, the commission voted to split the application: Part A (sidewalk and other site work and exterior repairs) was approved to move forward; Part B (the 2,030-square-foot rear patio proposed as a solid concrete slab) was removed from the current approval and continued so the applicants can either revise the patio design to meet the city's permeable-surface guidance or return with more information and precedent for a concrete solution. Staff and commissioners advised the applicants to coordinate with staff on materials and on whether there is relevant precedent in the district.

The owners were told they may withdraw the patio portion and proceed immediately with the approved work; if they wish to pursue the patio later, they must submit a revised application or return at the Oct. 2 business meeting. The commission cited city alteration standards for site improvements and the HRC guidelines on patios and paving in its rationale.

Next steps: the applicants will consult with staff about engineering/drainage details and precedence in the district, and either withdraw the patio or return with revised drawings and additional documentation at the Oct. 2 business meeting.","The Historic Resources Commission approved exterior repairs and sidewalk replacements for 138 East Oakland Avenue but split the application and postponed a decision on a proposed solid concrete rear patio, citing the city's preference for permeable paving and the need for additional technical details.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Commission moves 1377 Bridal Road duplex from conceptual review to action

Architects present major rear addition at 157 Rustic Place; commission offers positive feedback and requests details

Commission continues review of window and exterior work at 204 East Oakland Avenue, asks for design details

Commission approves 7-foot fence for North Fourth Street auto shop with conditions

Historic commissioners approve most work at 138 East Oakland Avenue but defer concrete patio