[{"_1":2,"_124":-5,"_125":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,76,88,100,112],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},"mediaId",5973693,"mediaKeyId","5834982-c1151317afcbb62bfbdb19894bd22870","parentId",5834982,"title","Flagler Beach OKs $142,865 paving contract; commissioners ask staff to evaluate additional sections and FDOT responsibilities","audioSeconds",575,"startMs",7071000,"endMs",7646000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5834982-c1151317afcbb62bfbdb19894bd22870&start=7071&end=7646","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5834982-c1151317afcbb62bfbdb19894bd22870/thumbnail_7071000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/5973693/Florida/Flagler-Beach-OKs-142865-paving-contract-commissioners-ask-staff-to-evaluate-additional-sections-and-FDOT-responsibilities","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5973693-238d8124c7f53d1d6dd68c240a04fa5e/orig.mp4?Expires=1770487448&Signature=OgWQffGxCvCc4zUDkjdkq~x2PH4wqk5EPdpptFlyd4n62~dBxi1hBQjxxxNeD1ylUHAg0qCD~vox-ASW7QnM5GmxIbnVgmM5Mu-MxvY4EuV7vJxeF97wQggAMwmzBM3SzPFnlkBQMQZ2N7M0O22vh05lWpyEq2nAEuMifPGaygUF9fSUx1yBVH2c4fQ~BNjx-moLR61jGUwfzI8GZcxj6CUykN1W4IZ7YXi8d9tezJ4LaILM~pOjgN5OP~3R4L1yPepPQuL3DtJNcwtHLDORLYbhNOCzW3gKa~9kWiIXPfMPDnrSSs0CuUiIS0rvmQxKWKxFoUsTSgjqdtXREuk3CQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","City of Flagler Beach, FL","date","2025-09-26T00:00:00Z","article","The City Commission on Sept. 25 approved a $142,865 paving contract (Resolution 2025–74) to mill and resurface several street segments next fiscal year, and commissioners asked staff to evaluate additional sections and clarify state responsibility for nearby roads.

What passed
The contract covers mill-and-resurface and repaving tasks that staff identified for the coming fiscal year. The staff presentation listed segments including North Flagler (Moody to Second Street), Palm Avenue (Springdale to the cul-de-sac), South Sixth (A1A to Lakeshore) and a portion of South Central (from First to Third). The staff report and contract included milling as an option where required; commissioners asked that milling be performed on sections that need it rather than a thin overlay.

Discussion highlights
- Commissioner Bellhumor pressed staff on why only a two-block section of South Central (First to Third) was included, noting the pavement south of Second Street shows pronounced washboarding and asked whether the scope could be extended to Third through Eighth. Staff said RoadBotics pavement assessment informed the project list, and that some sections farther south did not reach the threshold the assessment used. The commission asked staff to obtain additive pricing from the contractor for additional milling/resurfacing so the work could be done in one mobilization if funds allow.
- Commissioners also asked staff to confirm whether parts of North Flagler and Moody Lane are state-owned (FDOT) and therefore potentially covered by FDOT resurfacing rather than the city. Staff said they would verify FDOT jurisdiction and, where FDOT is responsible, pursue coordination.

Public comment
A resident urged that the city retain millings from the contractor for municipal reuse. Another resident suggested that if FDOT must pay for a portion of the work, the city should not duplicate it.

Vote
The resolution passed on a 3–1 vote. Commissioner Cunningham recorded the dissent; the motion passed with the majority directing staff to seek milling and additional additive pricing where practical, and to check jurisdictional responsibility with FDOT.

Context and budget notes
The staff memo shows the city budgeted roughly $287,000 for paving work in the coming fiscal year; the approved contract covers $142,865 of that total. Staff said projects not in this particular contract could be included in future contracts or triggered as add-alternates when the contractor mobilizes to the city.

Quoted in meeting
\"If milling is required, then it has the additional cost,\" a staff member said, explaining that milling was included as an option in project proposals.

Next steps
Staff will ask the awarded contractor for pricing to extend milling/resurfacing to the more damaged section of South Central (Third to Eighth) and will confirm FDOT responsibilities for North Flagler and Moody Lane before executing the full scope.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","CRA, Special & Regular Meeting of the Flagler Beach City Commission 09/25/2025","oneSentenceSummary","The Flagler Beach City Commission approved a $142,865 paving contract on Sept. 25 and directed staff to pursue milling where necessary, obtain additive pricing to extend work on South Central, and confirm whether certain road sections are FDOT responsibilities.","taxTitle","Flagler Beach City, Flagler County, Florida","taxId",57027,"location","Florida","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":77,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":78,"_41":79,"_43":80,"_45":81,"_47":82,"_49":83,"_51":84,"_53":85,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":86,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":87,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},5973697,"Flagler Beach commission advances 30% Beachwalk design, directs new concrete piles and masonry walls; trims roof and removes south beach stair",2593,4050000,6643000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5834982-c1151317afcbb62bfbdb19894bd22870&start=4050&end=6643","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5834982-c1151317afcbb62bfbdb19894bd22870/thumbnail_4050000.jpg","/articles/5973697/Florida/Flagler-Beach-commission-advances-30-Beachwalk-design-directs-new-concrete-piles-and-masonry-walls-trims-roof-and-removes-south-beach-stair","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5973697-455e9cb13dfdf3bd86c95f5509a12422/orig.mp4?Expires=1770487448&Signature=MURBmtZ7LDvvUp9GvqKQlN9wJ2TqlRDPUOOl5Nh14X4f-GNfIGYjSLOXgvOu6sdkrITcKjxJDsmIq3lPco-wdMfN2x2pH4JftDSQYhBTsuSOC~p7GdMQzkpMvaqNX1qQp5dbQXK1BTpLlL1TsxVT0K7n-L0X7ZA6mAMAQpI4TgAv~Jm1G033p8rceCi5l2vUtPJt0xAU9MlwajhHIRf92ughwoK42BS1VgtWCcznLkAgdLsQYIL-~Lyc7YUyvqpornGVpeIQyZ8lGAEy69ttZLxOWCPh1dEDUzJUuYR0AX6UCQkyHJnAK88fWRK3PgrLGqC0kwhazXfZ4BNULUMWow__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Flagler Beach City Commission on Sept. 25 approved direction to staff and the design team to carry the Beachwalk and pier project forward at 30% design with several significant design decisions: new concrete piles rather than wholesale reuse of existing timber piles, reinforced masonry (block) walls in key locations, a reduced roof height and pitch, a flat promenade with no southern beach stairway and a series of value-engineering alternates to control costs.

Why it matters: The project sits at Flagler Beach’s signature pier and beachfront block and is being developed under a tourist-development (TDC) grant. Design choices will determine capital costs, long-term maintenance needs and the structure’s resistance to marine exposure and storm damage.

What commissioners decided
- Pilings: Commissioners directed the design team to use new concrete piles for the new building footprint and promenade rather than rely on reusing aging timber piles. The design team had estimated timber reuse could extend the project’s cost profile short-term but carries an uncertain remaining service life. The commission favored a longer-life concrete foundation to match a multi-decade service-life for the new structures.
- Wall/foundation material: With concrete piles, commissioners favored reinforced masonry/block wall construction for longer-term durability rather than wood framing or a temporary veneer.
- Roof and façade: The commission directed the design team to lower the roofline modestly (remove one course of masonry/block from the top to reduce overall height by roughly 6–10 inches while maintaining sufficient slope for metal roofs if desired), retain a sloped roof in harmony with the A-frame pier building, and present value-engineered façade alternatives (split-face block or alternative cladding, with an alternate bid for a manufactured stone veneer) during final design and bidding.
- Promenade and beach access: The commission directed that the promenade be constructed at a flat elevation (eliminating the proposed raised deck with stairs in that location) and removed the proposed south-facing beach stair, citing exposure and maintenance concerns. Commissioners retained a covered breezeway between the two main building masses but asked that the south-facing stair and an additional sloped awning be shown as alternates or removed.
- Decking material: The design team presented wood decking and a higher-cost composite (Trex-style) alternative. Commissioners asked for both to appear in the bid as base/alternate so costs are explicit; the design team said using composite decking could increase the estimate by roughly $100,000–$200,000 compared with treated timber but would carry lower lifecycle maintenance.

Cost context and permitting
- Cost estimates: The project’s preliminary design estimate submitted for the TDC grant last year was about $2.7 million. The 30% design estimate presented at the meeting was approximately $2.9 million. If composite decking is selected, the design team estimated total project cost could increase to roughly $3.0–$3.1 million. The design team said the project-level contingency (approximately $304,100) covers early-stage cost variability but that detailed estimating and value engineering are required during final design.
- Structural life and testing: Staff and the design team said visual inspections indicate portions of the existing timber piles remain in good condition, but marine timber deteriorates unpredictably and can deteriorate rapidly once decay begins. Designers recommended targeted subsurface investigation, pile-tip elevation and capacity testing and a focused life‑cycle analysis if commissioners wanted to pursue partial reuse. Commissioners favored the long-term resilience of new concrete piles for a structure expected to last multiple decades.
- Permitting: The design team said it has engaged the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and is awaiting an updated erosion-projection line after recent nourishment work; early coordination had not identified a critical permitting barrier, but the design team said final permit approvals would depend on the updated erosion-line and typical FDEP review steps.

Formal action
A motion to proceed with the 30% design as amended (concrete piles, block walls, lowered roofline, flat promenade, removal of south stair and decking alternates) passed on a recorded vote, 4–0.

Quoted in meeting
\"Once the deterioration begins, then it will tend to accelerate,\" Gabriel Perdomo, the project manager, said about marine timber piles. \"It's an exponential decay.\"

Next steps
Staff will instruct the design team to prepare the updated 30% design drawings and a bid-ready package showing the base scope and alternates (decking, awning, beach stairs) for pricing. Staff also will undertake or procure targeted geotechnical/structural testing to quantify existing pile capacities if that analysis remains of interest, but the commission’s direction favors new concrete piles in the base design.","The Flagler Beach City Commission on Sept. 25 approved a set of design directions for the Beachwalk and pier 30% drawings that favor new concrete piles, masonry/block walls, a lowered roof profile, a flat promenade and removal of a south-facing beach stair.",{"_33":89,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":90,"_41":91,"_43":92,"_45":93,"_47":94,"_49":95,"_51":96,"_53":97,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":98,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":99,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},5973702,"Flagler Beach commission adopts 2025–26 city budget after removing proposed utility engineer line",607,4737000,5344000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5834982-c1151317afcbb62bfbdb19894bd22870&start=4737&end=5344","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5834982-c1151317afcbb62bfbdb19894bd22870/thumbnail_4737000.jpg","/articles/5973702/Florida/Flagler-Beach-commission-adopts-202526-city-budget-after-removing-proposed-utility-engineer-line","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5973702-5ae9916ab706e44e80514b9b685d5d8f/orig.mp4?Expires=1770487448&Signature=Qdl8UO2Qj3FxCPKjKO-WnK9LXcfUVHgTDhfZhGfVfL4Hs4aG5daMt3rjEBJrorYATyWFUH08uN6CBQBJQJ3LrBWaGikcYL88BH~Fry4sU65TmbYXOXhYONeTmgCb3D1P~TUahgfXmTS2E8nmTgb8MS1SRDCjEXc2pW-3iqPi0JYFHLhM1oxZTZ4cJJT0ObVSG03xGC6Y958pJYZqGAvUENdbr7cvWmfevW2knYw9fUFrXb2lElVme3xJ63bgKULSIeEAaS74Yj-EbjY7UgGbaLVoeL~d7aL5zuesrhokCOIMN6k7C0xu0acaIlqp4SJRP~E3gmEa8xURyeStG3wPxw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Flagler Beach City Commission adopted its final millage rate and the fiscal-year 2025–26 budgets on Sept. 25 after a contentious discussion over a proposed utility engineer position. Commissioners approved Resolution 2025–76 (the city budget) as amended to remove the proposed utility engineer line; the measure passed 3–1.

Why it matters: The utility fund pays for water, sewer and drainage infrastructure. The proposed position drew sustained questioning about cost, timing and whether the city should instead use consultants or add field staff. The commission’s decision affects staffing, planned work and future budget amendments.

Key points from the debate
- Commissioner Bellheimer objected to the salary and the speed of adding a higher-paid engineer, noting the city had paid $90,000 three years earlier for engineering work and that the proposed staffing increase would push related costs well higher. He said he would vote no unless the utility engineer expense was removed.
- Commissioner Spradley urged a broader view, stressing the volume of infrastructure and stormwater work the city needs and saying staff expertise is required to execute projects and move planned work forward.
- Commissioner Cunningham argued the city could hire third-party engineers and preferred boots-on-the-ground field staff to address urgent work rather than add an in-house engineer.
- The city manager recommended removing the new utility engineer line from the adopted budget if a majority of commissioners opposed it and said the position could be added later by a budget amendment should a demonstrated need emerge; that amendment would return to the commission for approval.

The vote and outcome
- Resolution 2025–76, the FY2025–26 city budget (as amended to remove the proposed utility engineer), passed 3–1. Commissioner Cunningham voted no; Commissioners Spradley and Chairman Sherman voted yes, and Commissioner Bellhumor recorded a yes vote on the final roll call after earlier remarks.

Next steps and constraints
- The city manager said that if a future need for a utility engineer is demonstrated, any hiring would require a budget amendment and would return to the commission for approval before the city began recruitment or contracting.
- Commissioners also discussed scheduling a city-manager performance evaluation; the commission asked staff to place that item on a future agenda.

Quoted in meeting
\"We have an incredible amount of work that needs to be done going forward,\" Commissioner Spradley said, urging the budget be approved to allow projects to proceed.
\"If you want it out, take it out,\" the city manager said, referring to the utility engineer line.

Context
The commission also adopted the millage resolution (Resolution 2025–75) setting the ad valorem property tax rate unchanged from the tentative rate. The budget adoption completes the city’s formal fiscal process before the Oct. 1 start of the fiscal year.","After debate over staffing and costs, the City Commission approved the final fiscal-year 2025–26 budget but directed that a proposed new utility engineer position be removed; any future hire would require a formal budget amendment and explicit commission approval.",{"_33":101,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":102,"_41":103,"_43":104,"_45":105,"_47":106,"_49":107,"_51":108,"_53":109,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":110,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":111,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},5973707,"Flagler Beach CRA names advisory board, approves small redevelopment grants and adopts CRA budget",171,1875000,2046000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5834982-c1151317afcbb62bfbdb19894bd22870&start=1875&end=2046","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5834982-c1151317afcbb62bfbdb19894bd22870/thumbnail_1875000.jpg","/articles/5973707/Florida/Flagler-Beach-CRA-names-advisory-board-approves-small-redevelopment-grants-and-adopts-CRA-budget","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5973707-7746bb2eb9edc7067793c56f67714c64/orig.mp4?Expires=1770487448&Signature=XwNoJO-puMa-NtXmmbYgb0KjzJFi018WgiXBLK21Zrn1ZeMWCxYwCENtuJQ8PW3KDJLSY1dmKrTOtfQ3ZW4YRiEihj89S7lv0tJ5m5E9zqqGEWaIHhkRgUAaBUEI3bJnHAqwKQFE5WeGHsaA00PahQsikcgSkwggGgWPXzkHrhpI4TCO9Ou2RAyjHWPA0255psURoezPa9XZj7gZBci3~1dmkb2~g9ldF4R4acyJIxpG-Uo4l2fFM~GVLnOMxoQVu5If4gIJlKD~xYUQ8oC3EKb7RQuFGZU8lj80vVZoZCVq7yWl-xzgzLcUbJn~wKzNQxc7TCj2w5WtZVlYsmRfMg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Flagler Beach Community Redevelopment Agency on Sept. 25 named members of a new CRA advisory board, approved two small redevelopment grants to downtown property owners and adopted the CRA operating and capital improvements budget for fiscal year 2025–26.

Why it matters: The CRA’s advisory board is intended to strengthen outreach and engagement with area businesses. Small grants fund façade and frontage improvements on Main Street properties; the CRA budget provides staff the authority to pursue lighting, Veterans Park and Wickline Park improvements in the coming year.

Appointments
City staff announced the advisory-board appointments and term lengths for the CRA business and resident seats. Named business representatives serving two-year terms include Christopher Marlow, Jeff Meyer and Manaj Bulla. One-year business seats were announced for Anthony Sonali and Don Romero. Resident seats included Penny Hackett (name clarified during the roll call) and Gerald Reynolds as resident at-large.

Small redevelopment grants
- 404 South Ocean Shore Boulevard: Applicant Mr. Wade requested a small redevelopment grant for frontage improvements to restore a front porch, repair wall boards and windows and remove overgrown landscaping. Staff said the project estimates exceeded $30,000; the CRA’s small-grant program provides up to $5,000, reimbursable; staff recommended approval. The motion to approve carried by roll call 4–0.
- 316 South Ocean Shore Boulevard: Applicant Ms. Revels requested funding to create the appearance of two facades (front office and rear retail facing the Waffle Cone). Staff reported two competitive bids for each scope; staff recommended $4,607.50, which reflects 50% of the quoted $9,000 estimated cost (up to the $5,000 maximum). The motion carried by roll call 4–0.

CRA budget
City staff presented Resolution 2025–83 to adopt the CRA operating and capital improvements budget for FY 2025–2026. Commissioners asked for clarification of capital project listings in the packet; staff explained that some line items in the budget packet appear in other funds and highlighted CRA-specific capital items (CRA city parking lot, CRA light replacement, Wickline Park renovation and Veterans Park improvements). The CRA budget resolution passed on a roll-call vote, 4–0.

Quoted from meeting
\"He is seeking funding to undertake a significant frontage improvement designed to enhance the building's curb appeal,\" the CRA director said during the grant presentation.

Next steps
Staff will process grant reimbursements after applicants complete work and submit required documentation. The newly appointed CRA advisory board will begin outreach with area businesses and is expected to advise on implementation priorities for CRA-funded capital improvements.
","The Community Redevelopment Agency announced appointments to a new advisory board, approved two small redevelopment grants to local storefront projects, and adopted its operating and capital improvements budget for fiscal year 2025–2026.",{"_33":113,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":114,"_41":115,"_43":116,"_45":117,"_47":118,"_49":119,"_51":120,"_53":121,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":122,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":123,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":72,"_73":74,"_75":74},5973712,"Flagler Beach approves farmers market operating agreement, allows limited amplified music and clarifies vendor hours",603,1225000,1828000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5834982-c1151317afcbb62bfbdb19894bd22870&start=1225&end=1828","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5834982-c1151317afcbb62bfbdb19894bd22870/thumbnail_1225000.jpg","/articles/5973712/Florida/Flagler-Beach-approves-farmers-market-operating-agreement-allows-limited-amplified-music-and-clarifies-vendor-hours","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/5973712-04da459dc0ad21c4e3451382bce6ee63/orig.mp4?Expires=1770487448&Signature=nXOuO1R1Fi6ntNfmDrjEke031JJx2ywFFgEIaZCCfoq-qLVDQ7ZfoWjPZ6WfaSz0nnIRvPkp-~3WVfsbfmkYBamDUSo4NPRAwuGHuUyMtnw8M4Ey1k7roW66JQ1ZdGchpVaDvjkI3aBLpeXAmciCLOIe7G0XpMqgZdHq7as4ggWWDP0mnlZYDVkXgP3BQII~fvcFuaqG30KoVteeasB9oKFu7AKLjSjbq1b0GNbQ8qI5Pwg0ro-yH2J8OEjgY86S9Dm5E-iYuGXHklxFM2-t0zh-uGeHJapskaVGtApGzt~wNaLGsXDg2LRo-NDI7KtkQ14-fF39o66lgvGYrP9uJA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Community Redevelopment Agency on Sept. 25 approved a formal operating agreement for the Flagler Beach farmers market, adding language to allow amplified music subject to the city noise ordinance and clarifying an early setup exception for a produce vendor that uses a refrigerated truck.

Staff and market organizers told the CRA the market has grown from about 10 vendors at its old site to nearly 30 at the new Second Street location, and market income now covers carrying costs for the year. The CRA director recommended two edits to the draft agreement: remove a restriction that limited music to non-amplified sound and add an annual review clause.

Why it matters: The farmers market sits in the CRA district and is billed as an economic development and downtown-activation tool. The changes will affect noise management, vendor logistics, and annual oversight.

What the agency approved
- Allowed amplified music but explicitly subject to the existing city noise ordinance and enforcement, rather than creating an event-specific decibel standard. City staff suggested a “reasonable person / audible distance” approach as an enforcement guide instead of strict decibel thresholds because of calibration and enforcement concerns. Market representatives said music has been “minimally amplified” and vendors naturally lower volume when customers can’t talk.
- Clarified vendor setup times: the agreement requires most vendors to start setup at 7:30 a.m. but makes a written exception for a produce vendor who begins deliveries and setup at about 5:30 a.m. in parking spaces (not in the street). City counsel advised that the early-setup arrangement be put in writing in the agreement.
- Added a provision that the agreement will be reviewed and renewed annually.
- Asked market managers to remind vendors not to block designated museum parking or other reserved spots that affect nearby businesses and residents.

Supporting details and constraints
- Market organizers reported the move to Second Street has boosted visitation and vendor count, and that market revenue now covers annual carrying costs and allows donations to be spent on mission activities.
- The city asked the new CRA advisory board — recently created and to be appointed by the commission — to consider longer-term noise policy and whether a distance-based “reasonable person” standard should be adopted.

Formal action
A motion to approve the operating agreement as amended carried on a roll-call vote of 4–0. (Roll-call names recorded in the meeting transcript: Commissioner Bellhumor, Commissioner Cunningham, Commissioner Spradley and Chairman Sherman — all recorded as voting “yes.”)

Looking ahead
The market operators will work with staff to ensure vendors do not block reserved parking spaces; staff will include the early-setup exception in the written agreement and present the agreement for annual review.

Quoted in meeting (selected)
\"We went from 10 vendors to nearly 30 vendors, and it's been an excellent experience,\" said one market representative at the podium describing vendor and visitor response.
\"If I'm 100 feet away and I can't make out the words, it's not loud enough,\" the city manager said in describing a proposed reasonable-distance approach to noise enforcement.","The Flagler Beach Community Redevelopment Agency approved a formal operating agreement for the downtown farmers market with two main changes: allow amplified music subject to the city's noise ordinance and permit an early produce vendor to set up at 5:30 a.m.; the agreement will be reviewed annually.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Flagler Beach OKs $142,865 paving contract; commissioners ask staff to evaluate additional sections and FDOT responsibilities

Flagler Beach commission advances 30% Beachwalk design, directs new concrete piles and masonry walls; trims roof and removes south beach stair

Flagler Beach commission adopts 2025–26 city budget after removing proposed utility engineer line

Flagler Beach CRA names advisory board, approves small redevelopment grants and adopts CRA budget

Flagler Beach approves farmers market operating agreement, allows limited amplified music and clarifies vendor hours