In a pivotal meeting held on September 26, 2025, the Hillsborough County Evaluation Committee convened to assess proposals for the Disaster Recovery Management Program. The atmosphere was charged with anticipation as committee members shared insights on various firms vying for the contract, including Thorn, Tetra Tech, and Ernst & Young.

The discussion began with Thorn, where committee members highlighted the firm’s innovative use of an interactive GIS tool, which had previously earned them an award. Their experience with Hurricane Katrina was also noted as a significant asset. However, concerns arose regarding the quality of references provided by Thorn, with some contacts being outdated or unresponsive, raising questions about the thoroughness of their reference checks.

As the conversation shifted to Tetra Tech, committee members expressed mixed feelings. While acknowledging the firm’s solid proposal, they pointed out gaps in their experience, particularly in housing management. The lack of a robust call center capability was also a concern, as members emphasized the importance of having trained staff to handle complex inquiries effectively. Despite these shortcomings, one reference from Monroe County praised Tetra Tech for their clarity in guiding complex policy decisions, although the overall response rate from references was disappointing.

The committee then turned its attention to Ernst & Young, where a more favorable tone emerged. Members reflected on their positive past experiences with the firm, noting their collaborative culture and effective project management. The proposal was lauded for its clarity and thoroughness, with members appreciating the detailed methodology and the strong qualifications of their proposed staff. The existing relationship between the county and Ernst & Young was seen as a potential advantage, fostering efficiency in project execution.

As the meeting progressed, committee members emphasized the need for a contractor who could not only manage disaster recovery but also navigate the complexities of funding and compliance. The discussions underscored the critical nature of these evaluations, as the chosen firm would play a vital role in the county's recovery efforts following disasters.

In conclusion, the meeting highlighted the committee's commitment to selecting a capable partner for the Disaster Recovery Management Program. With a focus on experience, responsiveness, and the ability to manage complex projects, the committee is poised to make a decision that will significantly impact Hillsborough County's disaster recovery efforts in the years to come.