In a bustling Millis Town Hall, the Select Board convened on September 29, 2025, to address pressing matters concerning the foreclosure process and tax collection policies. The meeting, marked by technical difficulties and a lively exchange among board members, set the stage for a critical discussion on recent changes to Massachusetts General Law Chapter 60, which governs local tax collections.

Jennifer Scannell, the town's treasurer collector, took center stage to outline the implications of a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that has reshaped how municipalities handle tax foreclosures. The case, Tyler v. Henneman County, involved a Minnesota homeowner whose property was seized for unpaid taxes. The court ruled that the county's retention of surplus funds from the foreclosure sale constituted a violation of the Fifth Amendment's taking clause, mandating that such funds be returned to the original property owner. This ruling has prompted significant modifications to Massachusetts law, including an extension of the foreclosure petition timeframe from six to twelve months and a reduction in the interest rate on delinquent tax accounts from 16% to 8%.

Scannell emphasized the importance of understanding the tax taking process, explaining that if not executed correctly, a foreclosure cannot proceed. She detailed the steps involved, from sending out demand notices to recording an instrument of taking, which places a lien on the property. The town's foreclosure guidelines, adopted in 2013, were also revisited, highlighting the criteria for identifying properties with overdue taxes and the potential for payment plans.

The board discussed the historical context of tax foreclosures in Millis, noting that while the town sends out approximately 3,400 tax bills each quarter, only a small fraction—less than 2%—result in tax takings. Scannell shared past experiences, including a successful tax title auction in 2015, which had since become less viable due to the recent legal changes.

As the meeting progressed, the board acknowledged the increased administrative burden these changes impose, including additional notification requirements and the necessity of hiring a constable to post notices on properties. The discussion underscored the evolving landscape of tax collection and foreclosure processes, reflecting a broader commitment to fair and transparent governance.

In conclusion, the Select Board's meeting served as a vital platform for addressing the complexities of tax collection and foreclosure in Millis. With new legal frameworks in place, the town is poised to navigate these challenges while ensuring that the rights of property owners are upheld. As the board looks ahead, the implications of these changes will undoubtedly shape the future of local governance and community relations in Millis.