Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Planning Board Discusses Signage Variance Options for Winikeen Park

September 30, 2025 | Rhinebeck, Dutchess County, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Planning Board Discusses Signage Variance Options for Winikeen Park
In the heart of Rhinebeck, the Planning Board convened on September 30, 2025, to navigate the complexities of signage regulations that have become a focal point for local development. As members gathered under the bright lights of the town hall, discussions unfolded around the challenges posed by the existing zoning laws, particularly concerning the size and placement of signs for new developments.

A key moment in the meeting arose when board member Jim sought clarity on the options available for signage, highlighting the restrictive nature of the current code. “You can’t even put in your entrance sign because it’s probably going to walk,” he noted, emphasizing the limitations imposed by the eight-square-foot height restriction. This sentiment echoed throughout the meeting, as members acknowledged the need for effective signage to guide visitors through complex developments.

The board referenced past cases, such as the Ruby’s Subaru application, which had faced similar hurdles. The Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA) had shown understanding in granting variances for signage, recognizing that adequate signage is essential for the functionality of new projects. “The zoning board has been very understanding with regard to the applications that have been made for variances on signage,” one member remarked, suggesting a collaborative approach to overcoming these regulatory challenges.

As the conversation progressed, the board discussed the necessity of a comprehensive sign package, which would include not only entrance signs but also internal directional signage. The complexities of these requirements were underscored by the mention of traffic control signs, which must be integrated into the overall signage plan. “You have to give us a full sign package, and then we will go through it,” a member stated, reinforcing the importance of thorough planning.

The meeting also touched on a new sign application for Winikeen Park, where the board had previously provided feedback on design and size. While the proposed sign had seen a reduction in dimensions, concerns remained about its visibility and effectiveness in representing the park. “It’s done as any kind of placement and able to utilize the grandfather element,” one member explained, indicating the board's willingness to facilitate the sign permit process despite the challenges.

As the meeting drew to a close, the members reflected on the broader implications of their discussions. The ongoing dialogue around signage not only impacts individual developments but also shapes the character and accessibility of Rhinebeck as a whole. With a commitment to finding solutions, the Planning Board left the meeting with a renewed sense of purpose, eager to address the needs of the community while navigating the intricacies of local regulations.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI