[{"_1":2,"_122":-5,"_123":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99,110],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6454838,"mediaKeyId","5857889-bea2318adc9567cc9a6950eda4a92d60","parentId",5857889,"title","County IT contractor recommends endpoint detection and response; quotes roughly $4 per device per month","audioSeconds",442,"startMs",1294000,"endMs",1736000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5857889-bea2318adc9567cc9a6950eda4a92d60&start=1294&end=1736","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5857889-bea2318adc9567cc9a6950eda4a92d60/thumbnail_1294000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6454838/Clay-County/South-Dakota/County-IT-contractor-recommends-endpoint-detection-and-response-quotes-roughly-4-per-device-per-month","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6454838-e4ae780ca425de40f3191f44714f4d88/orig.mp4?Expires=1775219894&Signature=V1p~xSvby~~sAnF6th~hwgEEkyPEUKnMTVe3F-8RsRnKU9nxMvXBBTSnNuhpOHVVQs1QH10Ba5h-vtF5n-EkgtgzJ9Q-VEvG8RC45NzYSv4rWtVfDJ-bTHdUelMNBUxqdCVbn95B5umOsGy1GBf4NdzzDmZcIAEanHAI4UQ7XTbmfSYdSSX2S3TjQki0r64bvRPjYOuD4siaOQHky9iaIgPNLZ-2sRFLSaETLzR4sYorEsHTRyVAmL6tZTi7j~KgDi3D4idGpMU1NQL-Il9-yW~eWtPWJYWxPtSK4Ul4ahg9wvod0rbVU952m713RGSrHIR~3Ku516EIykv2Yz1VIA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Clay County South Dakota","date","2025-09-30T20:19:52.697Z","article","Jeff Erickson, of Erickson Solutions Group, recommended the Clay County IT environment add an endpoint detection and response (EDR) layer that detects suspicious behavior on individual computers, gathers logs, and can take automated actions to isolate threats.

Erickson explained the difference between traditional antivirus and EDR: antivirus typically scans files at download or execution, while EDR monitors runtime behavior and can stop processes that exhibit malicious actions. \"It picks up the behavior rather than just something that has happened,\" Erickson said, and it can \"automatically prevent it from doing something malicious.\"

Cost and deployment

Erickson told commissioners the typical cost is about $4 per system per month. Using the county's approximate inventory of 120 systems, he said the recurring cost would be in the low thousands of dollars a year. He said Erickson Solutions could deploy the software alongside existing antivirus and that the company would provide a written quote and implementation plan to county staff.

Threat context and insurance

Erickson cited recent local government ransomware incidents as justification for the added protection, and he said cyber-insurance providers increasingly expect EDR as a baseline control. Commissioners asked about false positives and operational impacts; Erickson acknowledged EDR can generate a false positive and said the vendor's cloud-based analysis and the county's IT partner would triage and release legitimate files when needed.

Next steps

County staff said they would request a formal quote and inventory update and then return with a contract for board consideration. No contract was approved at the meeting.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","September 30, 2025 County Commission Meeting","oneSentenceSummary","Erickson Solutions Group recommended adding endpoint detection and response (EDR) on county systems to detect and isolate malicious behavior; the vendor said the tool costs about $4 per endpoint per month and that cyber insurance and recent incidents make EDR increasingly standard.","taxTitle","Clay County, South Dakota","taxId",55676,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6454843,"Public hearing on rezone near 400th and 470th Drive draws neighbors' flooding concerns; board advances proposal to second reading",1895,2110000,4005000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5857889-bea2318adc9567cc9a6950eda4a92d60&start=2110&end=4005","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5857889-bea2318adc9567cc9a6950eda4a92d60/thumbnail_2110000.jpg","/articles/6454843/Clay-County/South-Dakota/Public-hearing-on-rezone-near-400th-and-470th-Drive-draws-neighbors-flooding-concerns-board-advances-proposal-to-second-reading","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6454843-bb7ff45fdfefa29469839283baed00b1/orig.mp4?Expires=1775219894&Signature=FPSiJDB5dDMG4TpIGmgH83XQFc4uWKtd4c5NlvK8LFuH3SUty4C90o5UZC1vgiBmvBR6EzIeysaFwoFzTc5AhVKs2pFw90qS8Mj79AURhLNEZ4c9hwnMKmP31tGoPKDgY7Xo0BWTq~uq5cyG4S64gse9SefjCCF-oiohfjalCPhjLuohUdQSp776UI1LaoeBDoMn3ZH4ps90la0VsMQo3ZQ4DSO~XHyC7-M6p5hoRa3tKYbiW5p9gpkgnG~cM-XWxEyq3hDGDixl7XSgBVxYRvhcCoxYsxw1OM~tesY2SL6UebGAJKgTcRiuXeihFFMIZTjcy1LWCB1sUis4OtHq8A__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At a public hearing, the Clay County Board of Commissioners considered a petition to rezone a parcel near 400th and 470th Drive from agricultural (A1 AG) to a rural-residential classification that would allow six homes on the site. The board conducted a first reading of the ordinance and heard detailed public comment about drainage and past flooding in the area.

Adam, the landowner and developer, told the board he planned six lots served from Prairie View and 470, with lot sizes roughly 1.5 to 2 acres. He said the low-lying area on the parcel would act as a retention area and that existing wet spots \"hold water the way it is now,\" adding he did not expect six small homes to produce substantially more runoff than current conditions.

Neighbors urged caution and pressed the county for more detailed drainage plans. Jose (a resident) told the board, \"Homes previously built by this developer had had flooding and structural issues,\" and asked the county to review prior projects before approving additional development. Several nearby residents described persistent flooding and a culvert at the intersection of Prairie View and 470th that they said is partially blocked or in poor condition. Rand Morgan, who identified his lot as part of the adjacent subdivisions, said that wet conditions are \"a significant concern for us and our lifestyle\" and noted the empty lot he uses as green space has become seasonally unusable.

County planner and staff described regulatory steps: rezoning is the first step, and a formal plat with a drainage plan and required engineering will be necessary before building permits are issued. Staff clarified that specific drainage designs and retention calculations are required on a future plat and that those technical requirements are not part of the zoning decision now before the board.

Board action

Commissioners voted to move the ordinance to a second reading and public hearing on Oct. 7 at 9:30 a.m. No final rezoning was approved at the meeting; the board advanced the matter so staff and the developer can provide additional technical information, including a final bill of sale and the drainage/plat materials that will be required for the subdivision.

Ending

Residents urged the board to ensure culverts and township road drainage are inspected and, if necessary, repaired before approving a final plat. County staff advised residents that culvert and road-maintenance questions involve township and county road authorities and that the plat review process will require engineering-level drainage documentation.","A first reading and public hearing on rezoning a property adjacent to 470th Drive for six rural-residential lots generated sustained public comment about drainage, culverts and past flooding; the Clay County Board of Commissioners moved the ordinance to a second reading Oct. 7.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6454848,"County finance adviser outlines options for excess bond proceeds, recommends defeasance to reduce outstanding debt",986,337000,1323000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5857889-bea2318adc9567cc9a6950eda4a92d60&start=337&end=1323","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5857889-bea2318adc9567cc9a6950eda4a92d60/thumbnail_337000.jpg","/articles/6454848/Clay-County/South-Dakota/County-finance-adviser-outlines-options-for-excess-bond-proceeds-recommends-defeasance-to-reduce-outstanding-debt","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6454848-4a82e6d45bdc533cd24a3e5041ef6871/orig.mp4?Expires=1775219894&Signature=F2yZDNYk-x36Fknd3oD2cwVlKqJTIO3ijgcH-TWbP0R5-Bk2DVd0g8gsptHSGysPPk92PxHcziOI9OLYdEaS0tZTzC0TE-N9fdKxEU1~U4j4TnOldyfpF1FDPyNKeuSImgxhTqtJdjvr~-803i50Pau8W1KugC9u4QiBBir2aU1CYaJhla8yN8uFz-RW7gE13GASfh2BQtUVzaFps0goOvamKkzoBqqmlpm6CpJekTGNSmNwBvooCiaeQu~Dlv06PrgC-GR1PH4Mv~V33HTvdAw1pOyQtQ2XNcuIZ646su3VFSGvlDB4~zIUHGcdm3YvKP62MUXaarebxqsbztOlXA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Tom Grama, of Colliers, advised the Clay County Board of Commissioners on options for handling unspent proceeds from a prior bond issue, saying the county could place the surplus in an escrow to defease a portion of the outstanding bonds and thereby reduce the debt shown on its books.

Grama said technical defeasance involves putting funds into an escrow account whose earnings pay debt service on the defeased bonds until the bonds are callable, and that the transaction \"reduces the amount of debt outstanding\" without immediately allowing the county to spend the cash elsewhere. He estimated that, on a hypothetical $7,000,000 of surplus, a defeasance could remove about $6,565,000 from the outstanding balance and generate net present-value savings in the hundreds of thousands of dollars based on current market rates.

Why it matters: Defeasance can produce immediate budgetary and accounting benefits by shortening the county's shown debt and lowering future annual debt service; but federal tax rules limit use of proceeds and interest earnings from tax-exempt bond issues.

Details and limits

Grama told the board that tax rules for the federal tax-exempt bond market restrict how the county may use excess bond proceeds and any interest they earn. \"If you issued more than $5,000,000 of bonds,\" he said, \"if you earn more interest on that, that money needs to be rebated back to the federal government.\" He added that because of those rules, simply holding surplus proceeds in a county account usually does not provide a net financial benefit compared with setting up an escrow for defeasance.

Grama explained timing constraints tied to call dates. For the bonds under discussion, portions are not callable for several years, so any defeasance would pay interest in escrow until the applicable call date; at that point the escrowed bonds could be refunded and removed from the county's outstanding debt schedule. He also described the modest negative arbitrage risk if escrow yields are lower than the bond coupon, noting an example loss on the order of tens of thousands of dollars in his illustrative case.

Next steps and procedure

Grama said a formal resolution by the board and engagement of bond counsel would be required to proceed, and Colliers would charge a nominal engagement fee. Commissioners indicated they would await final construction closeout numbers before deciding; Carrie and Travis (county staff mentioned during the discussion) said the final bills would clarify the exact surplus available. No formal county action on defeasance was taken at the meeting; Grama left the board with an illustrative analysis and said he would work with county staff when the final numbers are available.

Ending

County staff and the board agreed to review updated final project bills and the defeasance analysis before taking a resolution to engage counsel or to set up an escrow. Grama recommended defeasance as the safest way to reduce on-paper debt while respecting federal bond rules.","A Colliers adviser told the Clay County Board of Commissioners that excess project funds could be placed in an escrow to defease part of the 2017 bonds, lowering the county's outstanding debt and producing interest savings; federal rules limit how bond-proceeds interest may be used.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":103,"_47":104,"_49":105,"_51":106,"_53":107,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":108,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":109,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6454829,"Board approvals: agenda, minutes, contracts, budget and more — votes at a glance",0,55000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5857889-bea2318adc9567cc9a6950eda4a92d60&start=55&end=55","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5857889-bea2318adc9567cc9a6950eda4a92d60/thumbnail_55000.jpg","/articles/6454829/Clay-County/South-Dakota/Board-approvals-agenda-minutes-contracts-budget-and-more-votes-at-a-glance","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6454829-1fc1dc7e3a936590e7eae5f73da7e3d0/orig.mp4?Expires=1775219894&Signature=LfgBZymOMkHZ2Ngi32RC3KLZt-jQRaLA1C-fmXyKDGjPLNehYs5pZGMaHX3D8eUigXqCG0jXBtEU3FamCzcoWzyElsyDGRspJHeOmGrp92nWPSCUItcAyRVMaJiz7EdQHl917s2duZAHk8ZxAKH9~Eb4MjFoy~o8Cfa3eAJWTVcrbOKjSDyCcM948lo2aAoDno33bPgBEUB0WOqCZ24re8I5AW9PYKOcavX1PYdO9wMAmIHq9difd7Xz5jbzsl3Y0IpmeiJtmICTTmn02HVpzCOaJjEb8S1fMqntDQ-paOKbFgzWoLUVATtjUQKCqGOxa~IbI8lspaMdRE9HGbdifw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","At its meeting the Clay County Board of Commissioners took a series of procedural and policy votes. The following list summarizes each formal board action recorded during the session. Where transcript dialogue recorded only \"all those in favor, say aye,\" the board's motion passed and no roll-call tallies were provided on the record.

Votes at a glance

- Approval of the agenda (including an addition) — motion seconded and approved.

- Approval of prior meeting minutes — motion seconded and approved.

- Public hearing/first reading: Ordinance to rezone land adjacent to 400th and 470th Drive from A1 (AG) to rural-residential for six lots — motion to move to second reading set for Oct. 7 at 9:30 a.m.; motion passed.

- Adoption/acceptance of updated Emergency Operations Plan — motion and second; plan accepted. Staff asked that the plan remain confidential where it contains sensitive information.

- Contracts awarded/approved: dust-control contracts for exterior ($1,001.40) and interior ($1,003.06) maintenance; other construction and technology-related contracts were approved as listed on the agenda. Motions passed.

- Ditch board motions — motion and second recorded and approved (routine procedural action).

- Right-of-way application from Midco for 300 and Eighth Street (satellite tower) — motion to approve application passed.

- Fuel bid (Following Oil) — motion to approve bid passed.

- Jail housing contract/rate decision: board agreed to honor the existing $70-per-day contract rate through the end of the year and to notify partners that the county's daily rate will be $90 per day effective Jan. 1, 2026; motion passed.

- Vouchers (claims) — motion and approval.

- Adoption of the 2026 annual county budget — motion and approval.

- Adoption of the 2026 payroll (salary schedule) — motion and approval.

- Resolution to close the courthouse to allow employees to attend the law enforcement center groundbreaking — motion and approval (resolution 2025-25 referenced in discussion).

- Motion to enter and exit executive session for privileged/confidential legal and personnel matters — motion and second recorded; board returned to open session and adjourned.

Notes and procedure

Most motions were recorded as \"motion and second\" with the chair calling for voice vote and declaring the result. The transcript shows unanimous voice votes for many items (\"all those in favor, say aye\"). For items that will need follow-up (for example, the rezone and contracts involving future performance), staff will return with the required technical documents or signed contracts.

Ending

Board staff indicated they will prepare written contracts and updated documents for signature where required and that technical plat and drainage data will be supplied for the rezoning item prior to the next hearing.","The Clay County Board of Commissioners approved routine agenda and minute items, accepted an updated emergency operations plan, awarded several contracts, set inmate-housing rates to remain at $70 through year-end with a notified increase to $90 on Jan. 1, 2026, and adopted the 2026 budget and payroll.",{"_33":111,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":112,"_41":113,"_43":114,"_45":115,"_47":116,"_49":117,"_51":118,"_53":119,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":120,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":121,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6454834,"County receives $60,951 for domestic-violence services; juvenile diversion program earns $19,500 in state JJRI funds",282,1761000,2043000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5857889-bea2318adc9567cc9a6950eda4a92d60&start=1761&end=2043","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5857889-bea2318adc9567cc9a6950eda4a92d60/thumbnail_1761000.jpg","/articles/6454834/Clay-County/South-Dakota/County-receives-60951-for-domestic-violence-services-juvenile-diversion-program-earns-19500-in-state-JJRI-funds","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6454834-5d0e5664255cc8a1c639aa0477bd9e9d/orig.mp4?Expires=1775219894&Signature=mjQQ3KRpNmhVDSpd4gkI8QZvn7pCg-zqodcSt7DI8oRRyejwNKpYuN18eCtt9PYD15z6mZwb7C1-LE7VOkJ~zjtIAsbwRJpOcEpYJmC-bbarTRBk9BlHto0q6mZXnE1s8IZqfrRHmjlCWmTiyheePmA~VACFsZ76sdj~UONVr6Qtzsp5spWpNGSaH6ZfBIahFkC6KpMSqAfvAscon-UwGanE6kzgKiqWH364TUbBh-o74mActATV1LP8JJpq9osQW9Nk7A-a0ot1sWBpEynvgWN0HFrHK-C50IrwMHffpbcO5j3Q~bjB9V3N0L8VzTONqMLebUtNZ~sCH44mnpdoJA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","County staff reported that the county received $60,951.23 through a domestic-violence grant process; the funds are not distributed as a single lump-sum but are requested and disbursed to cover eligible work the office performs on a monthly basis.

A county staff member said, \"In past years, we received roughly anywhere from $20,000 to $30,000, so we received a significantly higher amount this year,\" and said staff believed lower application rates elsewhere left more money available to smaller counties.

Juvenile diversion incentive

Staff also reported that the county had 36 participants in the juvenile diversion program during the fiscal year and that 26 were successfully diverted. Under the state's Juvenile Justice Reform Incentive (JJRI) program, the county will receive $750 for each successful diversion; staff said the county's tally of 26 successful cases equates to $19,500 that will be paid through the state.

Staff noted timing constraints: the JJRI calculation runs on a July-through-June fiscal cycle, so cases still in progress after July are counted in the next year's totals.","County staff reported receipt of $60,951.23 for domestic-violence services and that the juvenile justice diversion program qualified for $19,500 from the state JJRI incentive based on 26 successful diversions this year.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

County IT contractor recommends endpoint detection and response; quotes roughly $4 per device per month

Public hearing on rezone near 400th and 470th Drive draws neighbors' flooding concerns; board advances proposal to second reading

County finance adviser outlines options for excess bond proceeds, recommends defeasance to reduce outstanding debt

Board approvals: agenda, minutes, contracts, budget and more — votes at a glance

County receives $60,951 for domestic-violence services; juvenile diversion program earns $19,500 in state JJRI funds