In a recent special board meeting, the Cochise County Board of Supervisors took a significant step by approving the retention of attorney Timothy Lasota to represent them in recovering settlement amounts related to the LaChance versus Cochise County case. This decision has sparked a debate among community members regarding the financial implications and the choice of legal representation.

During the meeting, a resident, Ms. Morse, voiced her opposition to hiring Lasota, citing concerns over the costs incurred in previous legal matters. She highlighted that the county has already spent approximately $240,000 on legal fees related to this case and others, raising questions about the financial prudence of continuing with Lasota. Morse pointed out that while Lasota is experienced, his past involvement in politically charged cases, particularly those related to unproven claims of election fraud, could be problematic for the county's reputation.

Morse also questioned the timing of the new lawsuit, noting that it comes just weeks before an upcoming election. She expressed concern that this legal action could complicate the county's efforts to communicate effectively with voters about the jail district tax election, which has a supermajority requirement for passage.

The board's decision to retain Lasota reflects their commitment to pursuing legal avenues to recover funds, but it also raises important questions about the impact of such decisions on taxpayer money and the community's trust in local governance. As the situation develops, residents will be watching closely to see how these legal strategies unfold and what they mean for Cochise County's future.