[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6460471,"mediaKeyId","5860792-68bc1962df3e753ee61232c1c7eb44e1","parentId",5860792,"title","Planning Commission approves annexation of 325.53-acre Gregory property north of Brights Lane","audioSeconds",650,"startMs",219615,"endMs",869810,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5860792-68bc1962df3e753ee61232c1c7eb44e1&start=219&end=869","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5860792-68bc1962df3e753ee61232c1c7eb44e1/thumbnail_219615.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6460471/Gallatin-City/Sumner-County/Tennessee/Planning-Commission-approves-annexation-of-32553-acre-Gregory-property-north-of-Brights-Lane","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6460471-51668c9a800924c13ced05fe51094bc6/orig.mp4?Expires=1773264116&Signature=kW1MHI47-wX23CNvxgFLw1ThoZKMcN85mqWl~bVyS7vLFC5lJ9R-nm0f9GRMsblmV1cmyM-cORNJjoxjfv-0Q4GH~WfchVbbE8NZ2E-Uh-HkL0eXA8Z431r1tTNhi0iQucbUBLh2ZSz3y5fop8x7FSsMKCO34-WrgCLzNJRkhH2pc-MOBK-WoKGLkWuGSlzDud0Nr6ZRwl90geObnhRANskrcGkMkaml5cwPhECWocdX-ezm0bRqJr72KtiT0QZx069babfOU9WTlumQXxbVIwRrojnyZsPpJo7oKDGUwe7C0ekaTfXVMs21U8dRVzl67GutU1uS7rcGLSqkufIbpw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Gallatin City, TN","date","2025-09-30T11:09:21Z","article","The Gallatin City Planning Commission unanimously approved annexation of roughly 325.53 acres owned by Gregory north of the Facebook site, near Brights Lane and Rountree Drive.

City staff presented the request and recommended a single staff condition altering the annexation boundary: change the length of two property lines (identified in staff materials as lines L28 and L30) from 25 feet to 10 feet to minimize how much of Brights Lane is included in the annexation. The commission approved the annexation with that condition; Commissioner John made the motion and Commissioner Albert seconded.

Why it matters: the property owner has submitted a concurrent comprehensive-plan amendment request seeking industrial land use for the acreage, and public-comment testimony at the meeting urged industrial zoning because commercial and manufacturing interest in the city remains high. Annexation is the preliminary step that allows the city to later process rezoning and site plans.

Details: staff said the annexation includes a narrow “sliver” of Brights Lane to establish contiguity; the applicant noted parts of Brights Lane remain privately owned by the Gregory family and that the 10-foot connection is the smallest area necessary to join the parcels. During questions commissioners pressed staff and the applicant about access, potential connections to Rountree Drive, and future site-plan-level issues including intersection geometry. The applicant said the owner intends industrial zoning and has submitted a comprehensive-plan amendment; staff clarified annexation does not by itself change zoning and that Rountree Drive is not part of this annexation but is being discussed separately for potential future annexation to facilitate driveway permits and access.

Public comment and applicant representation: Rosemary, representing the Gallatin Economic Development Agency, urged a favorable vote and said the community is nearly out of industrially zoned land and that manufacturers remain interested. Andy Leath of Greenlit Design represented the applicant and answered technical questions about property ownership and contiguity.

Next steps: annexation approval allows the applicant to pursue rezoning and site-plan approvals; the commission and staff said several development issues (access points, intersection alignment, and detailed utilities/engineering) will be handled during rezoning and subsequent site-plan review. The applicant has also submitted a comprehensive-plan amendment request to show intent for industrial use, but no rezoning or site-plan approvals were granted at this meeting.

","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City of Gallatin","oneSentenceSummary","The Gallatin City Planning Commission voted unanimously to annex about 325.53 acres owned by Gregory, establishing contiguity through a 10-foot sliver of Brights Lane; the developer has submitted a concurrent comprehensive-plan amendment seeking industrial designation but no rezoning was approved today.","taxTitle","Gallatin City , Sumner County, Tennessee","taxId",52803,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6460463,"Planning Commission approvals and votes: consent items and development applications",1113,151230,1264708,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5860792-68bc1962df3e753ee61232c1c7eb44e1&start=151&end=1264","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5860792-68bc1962df3e753ee61232c1c7eb44e1/thumbnail_151230.jpg","/articles/6460463/Gallatin-City/Sumner-County/Tennessee/Planning-Commission-approvals-and-votes-consent-items-and-development-applications","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6460463-e854e0da8ddb610d0d04d636826d74ab/orig.mp4?Expires=1773264116&Signature=oPvnKZzAlK5eVIyO15O2Om1d7VWX-pD1fpHfo~JpFElpHv4g3FKWeyexebFjYO9omzQHwz~CcPMCixANIhU9AxFmEGmfrmdsQ~0-frQIFAdT2Mr1FxElWcYMqCwlnpXpOlRtc1bYWSugmq~kMCjnMxsIrZJBon4E5UX3nLnyHUvifPTNvbww-FWHHC-ccIEDw2yv88O1LPsCUr5iN5HDDrrOWmCc9759Vohxy-BIdg825LONz11QbtAntFPrE27p1FXRIKkiBRCfp-Q0hlsVo2UmGdYKKUHXiqEjuRB-CXW-y~PdqcyB-FdDs7N8ld6DMk0PDF47mnhEpCu1uNqS3Q__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Gallatin City Planning Commission voted on a slate of consent items and several development applications. Below is a concise list of motions, outcomes and key facts from the meeting.

Votes at a glance
- Consent agenda (items 1–8: surety renewals and extensions; Carrollton Phase 7A acceptance of public improvements; Twin Eagles Phase 15 acceptance; Bledsoe Springs phases 1–3 plats; Savanna Marketplace Phase 2 re-subdivision; Laurelwood Park Phase 1 final plat): approved by motion (motion from Commissioner Albert; second Commissioner John); vote recorded as unanimous.

- Savanna Marketplace Phase 2 — Amended Preliminary Master Development Plan (PMDP) and Revised Final Master Development Plan (FMDP): staff recommended approval of Resolution 2025-103 with 22 conditions; the applicant agreed to the conditions. The commission first found the change a “minor amendment,” then approved the PMDP/FMDP with the 22 staff conditions (motion by Commissioner John; second by Commissioner Albert); vote recorded as unanimous. Project: six buildings totaling just under 71,000 square feet on about 8.94 acres; applicant will add one building and several drive-thru lanes; parking adjustments were part of the application.

- Savannah Marketplace Starbucks monument sign — Alternative sign plan: staff recommended approval of Resolution 2025-104 to allow a 14-foot monument sign (with approximately 6 feet below grade, leaving an 8-foot visible maximum) due to a White House Utility District easement and steep topography; applicant representative Jonathan Allison (Yesco Signs) agreed with staff comments. Motion to approve carried unanimously.

- Avery Trace amenity center — Final master development plan: staff recommended approval of Resolution 2025-106 with 10 conditions. The applicant agreed to staff comments; one commissioner recused from this item. The commission approved the final master development plan with staff conditions (motion by Commissioner Albert; seconded); vote carried (record shows the applicant and staff agreed to conditions; one recusal recorded).

- Southwater Food & Gas LED digital sign — Alternative sign plan: staff recommended approval of Resolution 2025-112 to replace a pole sign with a digital LED price panel monument sign; applicant representative Dan Knott (Petro Imaging) agreed to staff comments. Motion to approve carried unanimously.

- Gallatin Industrial Data Center Phase 2 — Amended site plan: staff recommended approval of Resolution 2025-111 with four conditions for a 135,000-square-foot data center on a 512.54-acre lot at 1432 Gateway Drive. Applicant representative Bridal Simpson (Barge Design Solutions) acknowledged staff comments. Motion to approve carried unanimously.

Meeting process notes: for items that required public comment, the commission opened and closed public hearings; applicants or their representatives were present for each discussed development item and generally indicated agreement with staff conditions. Motions and seconds were recorded on the record before the votes; multiple items were described as ‘‘minor amendments’’ before the formal approval of the final plans.

","The Planning Commission approved consent plats and multiple development items including Savannah Marketplace Phase 2, a Starbucks monument sign, Avery Trace amenity center, Southwater Food & Gas digital sign, and Gallatin Industrial Data Center Phase 2; this roundup lists motions, outcomes and key details.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6460466,"Planning Commission recommends denial of proposed temporary hold on rezonings after extended debate",1411,2082045,3493489,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5860792-68bc1962df3e753ee61232c1c7eb44e1&start=2082&end=3493","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5860792-68bc1962df3e753ee61232c1c7eb44e1/thumbnail_2082045.jpg","/articles/6460466/Gallatin-City/Sumner-County/Tennessee/Planning-Commission-recommends-denial-of-proposed-temporary-hold-on-rezonings-after-extended-debate","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6460466-af3ef65249e8e6c1dfc5d5f4c3270d9a/orig.mp4?Expires=1773264116&Signature=Z1ssp3FBHNVNWp0tCUfDF~RamipqUgRQDBPyYUeMMqw~9FQ6eccP6Dv~qGs~--6r1gi9ol7wWjgR2vhWPv2hEKC~7ne63HrnwjyD0hIdu9C9Wk5p2M1fyyI6qnFc-BLJZrubwFKTxu8q9e8mIb4~7eV0ioebskTKCIJJDZU~JLP1LM5quw~b~BsN3uzRJx0dxnBUjO1rjp8cwiFo50mwO2UtzGeZ8~bOa3KojZdjTgarTHGc6fE0tSB7LKdyTcXcjxFPM6OqaG7I1R7oDlMeE2l2iwwBBrihWs12WIaRWQQL2DOSNKz6fr-d0s3a448gO6rvJwfxbekdTj1VvTFTRw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Gallatin City Planning Commission voted to recommend denial of a proposed temporary hold on rezonings that city council had asked the commission to consider. The commission’s negative recommendation was 2 in favor of denial, 1 against, with 1 abstention and 3 absences recorded in the transcript.

Why it matters: the proposed temporary hold (labeled in staff materials as a “temporary hold” rather than a moratorium) would pause new rezoning approvals while the city completes a rewrite of its zoning code. Proponents said the pause would create breathing room to adopt a new, comprehensive zoning ordinance and avoid inconsistent approvals; opponents argued the measure would unnecessarily hinder development and give applicants indefinite opportunities to delay decisions.

Discussion summary: staff said the item was processed because city council had voted to have the Planning Commission consider the direction. Staff revised the language from “moratorium” to “temporary hold” and proposed a date-specific term through June 1, 2026 (roughly a six-month horizon based on council scheduling). Several commissioners questioned the length and overlap of review time for planning commission and city council, debated whether a rolling or fixed deadline would be better, and discussed grandfathering of applications filed under the existing code. Staff noted that pending applications could be converted to proposed new districts using a conversion chart at adoption and that without a formal withdrawal applicants can keep dormant applications active under current rules.

Outcome and vote: Commissioner [name not specified in transcript] moved to deny the temporary hold; the motion passed with a negative recommendation to council by a recorded margin of 2–1, with one abstention and three absences (transcript line: “2 to 1. Negative recommendation. With an abstention. And 3 absences.”). The commission debated alternative approaches during the hearing, including a proposal raised by one commissioner to pair Planning Commission approval of the new code with a shorter, council-enacted 90-day hold; that proposal did not carry.

Next steps: the Planning Commission’s recommendation (negative) will be transmitted to city council for its consideration. Staff noted that code adoption timing and any council action will determine whether individual pending applications are processed under the old code or converted under a new code conversion chart at adoption.

","The commission voted 2–1 with one abstention and three absences to give a negative recommendation on a proposed temporary hold (moratorium) on rezonings tied to adoption of a new zoning code; commissioners debated duration, grandfathering and process before the vote.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Planning Commission approves annexation of 325.53-acre Gregory property north of Brights Lane

Planning Commission approvals and votes: consent items and development applications

Planning Commission recommends denial of proposed temporary hold on rezonings after extended debate