[{"_1":2,"_111":-5,"_112":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87,99],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6454167,"mediaKeyId","5862165-1aa0c27cdfe7698e0b16da10b26b6930","parentId",5862165,"title","Council debates RPP visitor-pass exception; motion to recommit fails, amendment adopted","audioSeconds",581,"startMs",1337000,"endMs",1918000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5862165-1aa0c27cdfe7698e0b16da10b26b6930&start=1337&end=1918","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5862165-1aa0c27cdfe7698e0b16da10b26b6930/thumbnail_1337000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6454167/Baltimore-City/Baltimore-County/Maryland/Council-debates-RPP-visitor-pass-exception-motion-to-recommit-fails-amendment-adopted","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6454167-746b807f1774cb6987f9f351bd0dfd6c/orig.mp4?Expires=1775309691&Signature=JOxR1JBNKQveDH2Srzgj8mSQLeUcJMoVr1fC2X2Q2qKayTtfvVtn1R8yQ-sn2YeYo5SVa70EY9qz2dUY1veWL-dUoZs0liGC9pjMmlUvKm0bkcEcMMXwEcwr~rAFyFHE3Eu4Wogi60tuhaNvMma2VUaHkROmwfZ~Ql6OEmPjxAPCulG4jWWSdkIDi6YJ4GmkdAipgFqC~663x-uM2Xu8aSTVDAdr1uH98asyJDkOMpxakGHMGcfBxI26UsXN5gvSnXwdPVNRH9hwl5dn-Xw1rCCLQJEhENBxGmaHAJGDEEJ~DW39faF~qQrJfmeMatNPpjcUG6d5c5vcfAj6k8R4pg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Baltimore City, MD","date","2025-09-29T00:00:00Z","article","Council members debated a proposed Residential Permit Parking (RPP) exception for a single address in RPP Area 30 during Monday’s session. The measure, listed as City Council Bill 25-0583 (RPP Area 30, exception for 15 East West Street), prompted several members to argue the question of whether narrow, address-specific legislation is appropriate or whether a broader, citywide parking policy should be pursued.

Councilmember Torrance said the council should not legislate a single-address exception without a citywide analysis and moved to recommit the bill to committee for further study. Chair Dorsey and sponsor Councilmember Blanchard explained that the exception grew out of a prior neighborhood negotiation between a property owner and a neighborhood association and that the Parking Authority proposed a technical amendment to resolve how visitor permits would be allocated when a single-family property is converted to two units.

Torrance’s motion to recommit was put to a roll-call vote and failed; the council recorded the motion as receiving 3 votes in favor and 12 against. After the recommit motion failed, the council adopted the committee amendment providing one visitor permit per unit at the address and then moved the bill favorably as amended; the measure will be printed for third reading.

During debate Councilmember Schleifer questioned why the council would legislate a single-address exception rather than direct the Parking Authority to resolve permit allocation administratively. Sponsor Blanchard said the exception traces to an earlier negotiated agreement in the neighborhood and that the amendment proposed by the Parking Authority addressed practical enforcement concerns. No final passage vote occurred Monday; the item was advanced toward third reading.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","City Council Meeting; September 29, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Council considered a bill to allow additional RPP visitor permits for a single address in RPP Area 30. Councilmember Torrance moved to recommit for broader analysis; the motion to recommit failed on a roll-call tally of 3–12. A committee amendment allowing one visitor permit per unit was adopted and the bill was printed for third reading.","taxTitle","Baltimore City, Baltimore County, Maryland","taxId",4816,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6454172,"Council adopts amendments to building code bill restricting Type 3A residential height, expands sprinkler requirements",264,844000,1108000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5862165-1aa0c27cdfe7698e0b16da10b26b6930&start=844&end=1108","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5862165-1aa0c27cdfe7698e0b16da10b26b6930/thumbnail_844000.jpg","/articles/6454172/Baltimore-City/Baltimore-County/Maryland/Council-adopts-amendments-to-building-code-bill-restricting-Type-3A-residential-height-expands-sprinkler-requirements","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6454172-86f42caea046f187ef4e6de8684a6de5/orig.mp4?Expires=1775304362&Signature=J-~-V6To8NE3rd-iRniIdGpzdji4RpdMUIAebLrAW5mp-RgW3t28pYjkMWgR0G3k~j4e6aYzUd6nl0QgTHmbcVqYhnFZbRs6RkTfNcIOYkXAp~ukDR6x~vEb1EOMNuOLR2ob~rD5Tq9fm~OJr99nr~NyPCqeaPQZgKfJWa~p-OKc4rjdJiN4bu0xVbdTj~JRup2UGX6njFbQ19wr-HF~HzM2vBmJiZqMBmvqKNj8xxLGG6qo-iDN9NoVrsylj0wyM4tmkTeFgB0ItEA3SgYg~fb5YX7At-gUZ7pPJwNwUMHKiImElDukuvNiqG0uuBawDCZfHCpUWKpQ9LOHYHBZHA__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The City Council on Monday adopted committee amendments to City Council Bill 25-0062, which alters the building code’s rules for single-stair residential construction and adds expanded sprinkler requirements. Chair Dorsey, sponsor of the Land Use and Transportation Committee measure, said the amendments were recommended by the fire department and the committee.

Dorsey described four amendments: Amendment 1 corrects a numbering error; Amendment 2 narrows the allowable residential stories for Type 3A construction to five stories; Amendment 3 expands sprinkler requirements beyond current local standards to anticipate forthcoming International Code Council changes; and Amendment 4 copies the building-code changes into the city’s fire code “word for word” so both codes match.

Dorsey said, in part, that Amendment 2 “clarifies the type of building, Type 3A. So the bill allows for a single stair construction building to be up to a certain height... What Amendment 2 says is that in Type 3A construction, you can only have 5 stories of occupancy for residential use.” He also described Amendment 3 as updating local sprinkler requirements to reflect expected changes in the International Fire Code.

Councilmembers adopted the committee amendments by voice vote and then moved the bill favorably with those amendments. The council instructed that the bill be printed for third reading. The recorded debate was limited to technical questions and no roll-call tally for the amendment vote was provided in the transcript.","The council adopted committee amendments to a building-code bill that limits residential stories for Type 3A construction and expands sprinkler requirements; the bill was moved favorably and will be printed for third reading.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6454177,"Councilmembers introduce updates to Baltimore Children and Youth Fund ordinance",407,343000,750000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5862165-1aa0c27cdfe7698e0b16da10b26b6930&start=343&end=750","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5862165-1aa0c27cdfe7698e0b16da10b26b6930/thumbnail_343000.jpg","/articles/6454177/Baltimore-City/Baltimore-County/Maryland/Councilmembers-introduce-updates-to-Baltimore-Children-and-Youth-Fund-ordinance","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6454177-8cbd1fa231bdf604e90e087222e30f02/orig.mp4?Expires=1775293269&Signature=dvJY-40hovpsqPM6m207jSY1txcJtVJ31pUmQXWAO1929WaaHw~6LaJC7l3cHX6EwA9NbYMrs3rHnpeHzXP-~C28Rz8r5Cn~PvQwTVS1L4uEUux7rgA6RKzZXQ2F0d0ZfjPy~5eOnJ634sDWvNW4qfapIKmsbvybWRm6onU-pbw2POVl6vvONBeQrp-mJHnWvdxhKIPHSc0ONYpbl7r3tdC-8kQKmAzXxiqu3l7H9~rWArdEVZs89IhTKdGKBtusveDMi~m8jAtxjyfZn4jgbFzUpljvqn3SfhJzFVn6I4Gi~ArXQNFAel2RYTdgaYmKe~hairvmRaBasMYtJU77jg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","City Council members on Monday introduced a bill to amend the ordinance governing the Baltimore Children and Youth Fund to update grantmaking procedures, change board composition rules and require a report to the council. The measure, introduced as City Council Bill 25-0100, was assigned to the Education, Youth and Older Adults Committee.

Sponsor Councilmember Parker said the bill’s goal is to “provide updates to the existing ordinance that governs and supports the Baltimore Children and Youth Fund to ensure that the law aligns with current operational realities as that fund has grown and that organization has evolved and that BCUF is best positioned to meet its vital mission.”

The bill’s sponsors and other council supporters told colleagues the ordinance has not kept pace with the fund’s expansion and described the bill as a way to strengthen transparency, governance and community engagement in grantmaking. Councilmember Bullock, chair of the Education, Youth and Older Adults Committee, said the legislation aims to “take that great work and make it even better” and that committee hearings will allow “deep conversations and direct conversations, with the administrators of [the youth fund] and those who are also benefiting from the services.”

The measure would alter the processes by which the fund may disperse grants, change the composition of the fund’s board of directors and require a report; the text presented at introduction did not list exact funding changes or dollar amounts. Sponsors said the committee will hold additional hearings to review details and operations before any final action.

The bill was formally referred to the Education, Youth and Older Adults Committee for further consideration and hearings.

The council noted Councilmember Conway as a cosponsor. No vote on final passage occurred Monday; the item remains at the committee stage.","Councilmembers introduced legislation to update the Baltimore Children and Youth Fund’s governing ordinance, saying the changes would align the law with the fund’s grown operations and improve transparency, governance and grant-making processes. The bill was referred to the Education, Youth and Older Adults Committee.",{"_33":100,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":101,"_41":102,"_43":103,"_45":104,"_47":105,"_49":106,"_51":107,"_53":108,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":109,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":110,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6454162,"Votes at a glance: four bills approved for third-reading advancement and several property/zoning bills moved forward",71,2139000,2210000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5862165-1aa0c27cdfe7698e0b16da10b26b6930&start=2139&end=2210","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5862165-1aa0c27cdfe7698e0b16da10b26b6930/thumbnail_2139000.jpg","/articles/6454162/Baltimore-City/Baltimore-County/Maryland/Votes-at-a-glance-four-bills-approved-for-third-reading-advancement-and-several-propertyzoning-bills-moved-forward","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6454162-eabac845687995077f4f5c301c81bc56/orig.mp4?Expires=1775309691&Signature=Jl5NrHJ8KrCQMr9AcDV-xopranSkf0CnsN-FQFSbE2zVtef0pz516lFldbq8zZpTKXaoGNgNSdFPYebJSM9jY3YK1dLI8pf7AJrJCjGYH22EY-W0dmXfQ1BKGO9xIrTInH61R-D1JwPotOX4eMaKJZstzEmfF7m-OlFIiuO4qJ4WqsStp1Jxo1ZB51YLPiANBk8-tQNDRlchjNDQCohsTyAzoJcRXWnp34Fs4eqO~jdrEw~YKtMSKdZ7Mm2VSzJSQOnHtIxczxgTGq~kSoJcQBSDv8TfjEdLno5akDcpaEqFplJ1UJNB5O-Am85i87v3XB5n74J4ar1BvEONZZzuoQ__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","The Baltimore City Council recorded action on multiple measures Monday and advanced several bills toward final consideration. The clerk read bills on third reading and the council approved the following measures as read:

- City Council Bill 25-0050 — Water bill tenant right to review: approved on third reading. The measure provides tenants with a right to review water-bill records as described in the bill text at third reading. (Clerk read names: Parker, McCray, Dorsey, Conway, Schleifer, Middleton, Torrance, Gray, Bullock, Porter, Blanchard, Jones, Glover, Ramos, Cohen.)

- City Council Bill 25-0059 — Building, fire and related codes; vacant building receivers; failure to sell: approved on third reading. The bill addresses code enforcement and procedures related to receivership for vacant buildings and failure-to-sell provisions.

- City Council Bill 25-0069 — Sale of property, 1820 North Charles Street: approved on third reading.

- City Council Bill 25-0074 — Repeal of ordinance 06-222 (Planned unit development 1100 Wicomico Street): approved on third reading.

In addition to those third-reading approvals, numerous land-use and street-closure bills were read, committee amendments were adopted on several items, and multiple measures were printed for third reading for later final votes. Several bills from the Land Use and Transportation Committee were recommitted to committee for additional agency reports and others were advanced with committee amendments.

The council also approved the consent calendar earlier in the meeting and heard committee scheduling announcements and district updates. For the full text and recorded votes, see the printed version of the meeting minutes and the bills as entered in the council docket.","At third reading the council approved several measures and printed multiple land-use bills for additional consideration; the clerk recorded approval of four bills and several zoning and property measures were advanced to third reading.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

Council debates RPP visitor-pass exception; motion to recommit fails, amendment adopted

Council adopts amendments to building code bill restricting Type 3A residential height, expands sprinkler requirements

Councilmembers introduce updates to Baltimore Children and Youth Fund ordinance

Votes at a glance: four bills approved for third-reading advancement and several property/zoning bills moved forward