The Flagstaff Planning and Zoning Commission convened on September 29, 2025, to discuss significant amendments to local land use policies, particularly focusing on the processing of minor plan amendments for smaller parcels of land. The proposed change aimed to establish a threshold of 5 gross acres, allowing sites under this size to be processed as minor amendments, while those exceeding this threshold would follow the standard major plan amendment procedures.

During the meeting, staff expressed concerns about the potential for this change to create loopholes. Specifically, they warned that allowing exemptions for parcels under 5 acres could lead to larger landowners subdividing their properties into smaller segments to bypass the more rigorous major amendment process. This concern was tied to the broader issue of maintaining the integrity of the urban growth boundary, which the commission had previously agreed should not be expanded without thorough consideration.

Commissioner Christine raised valid points about the burdensome nature of the current process for small property owners, arguing that the requirement for a general plan amendment followed by a zoning case could deter development. She referenced practices in other jurisdictions, such as Queen Creek, which allow for exemptions to streamline processes for smaller projects. Her comments highlighted the need for a balanced approach that encourages infill development while preventing potential abuses of the system.

The discussion also touched on the complexities of ownership structures, with concerns that large parcel owners could manipulate ownership through partnerships or LLCs to circumvent regulations. The commission acknowledged the need for clear language that would prevent such practices while still supporting small-scale development.

As the meeting progressed, the commission agreed to revisit the proposed language to ensure it effectively addresses these concerns. They considered limiting the exemption to specific categories of plan amendments, particularly those related to residential infill, to avoid unintended consequences while promoting development in smaller parcels.

In conclusion, the commission's deliberations underscored the delicate balance between facilitating development and safeguarding community planning principles. The next steps will involve refining the proposed language to prevent loopholes while still supporting small property owners, with further discussions anticipated in upcoming meetings. This ongoing dialogue reflects Flagstaff's commitment to thoughtful urban planning amidst growing housing demands.