Become a Founder Member Now!

Commission Proposes Clarifications on Building Setback and Facade Requirements

October 02, 2025 | Anacortes, Skagit County, Washington


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Commission Proposes Clarifications on Building Setback and Facade Requirements
The City of Anacortes Planning Commission convened on October 1, 2025, to discuss key design standards affecting building facades in the city. The primary focus of the meeting was a proposed clarification regarding the step back requirement for buildings exceeding the maximum base height.

The discussion began with an overview of the current design standard, which mandates that buildings incorporate a minimum horizontal step back of 8 feet along at least 75% of the street-facing facade. This requirement aims to reduce the perceived bulk of buildings at the pedestrian level.

Commission members addressed a request to either remove or clarify the step back requirement. Questions arose regarding the definition of "facade," specifically whether it referred to all sides of a building or just the portion facing the street. It was confirmed that the requirement applies solely to the street wall face, as defined in the city’s code, negating the need for further clarification on this point.

Additionally, the commission considered a suggestion to reduce the total area subject to the step back requirement to 50%, which would still allow for some modulation of building design. Another option discussed was the introduction of a departure provision, enabling developers to propose alternatives that meet the intent of the code while potentially deviating from the 75% requirement.

The meeting clarified that the step back requirement applies only to the portion of the building that exceeds the maximum base height. Specifically, it was emphasized that the 75% step back applies only to the street-facing facade above this height, allowing flexibility in placement between the ground floor and the top floor.

In conclusion, the Planning Commission's discussions highlighted the importance of maintaining aesthetic standards while providing developers with options to meet design requirements. Further deliberations on these proposals are expected in future meetings as the commission seeks to balance urban development with community interests.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Washington articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI