Concerns over proposed charter changes dominated the Bryan City Council meeting on October 6, 2025, as residents and board members voiced strong opposition to the potential dissolution of the Board of Public Affairs (BPA). The BPA, the last elected board of its kind in Ohio, has been a focal point for utility oversight, and many fear that its elimination could undermine transparency and accountability in local governance.

During the meeting, a resident raised critical questions regarding the implications of the proposed changes, particularly about the future of existing BPA resolutions and the stability of the current utility structure. "What happens to the resolutions that have currently been passed by the BPA? Will they be honored, changed, or voided?" they asked, emphasizing the need for clarity before any vote is cast.

The resident also challenged the rationale behind the proposed modernization, questioning what aspects of the current structure are deemed unstable. They pointed out that issues like director turnover and staffing concerns remain unaddressed in the proposal, raising fears about potential layoffs or consolidations that could affect utility employees.

Another BPA member echoed these sentiments, highlighting the board's extensive experience and the risks associated with transferring oversight to the mayor and city council. "Our board includes three former BMU employees and two current utility professionals. That depth of knowledge cannot be replicated overnight," they stated, arguing that the proposed changes could lead to misaligned priorities between city governance and utility operations.

The discussion also touched on financial implications, with concerns that utility funds could be redirected to unrelated city expenses if oversight is consolidated. The BPA members emphasized that their modest budget of approximately $62,700 for 2025 is a small price to pay for the expertise and accountability they provide.

As the meeting concluded, calls for a motion to table the ordinance until all questions are thoroughly addressed were made, underscoring the community's desire for a well-considered plan that prioritizes the interests of both voters and utility employees. The outcome of this debate could significantly shape the future of utility governance in Bryan, making it a pivotal moment for local democracy.