[{"_1":2,"_99":-5,"_100":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4,"_26":27},"root",{"_5":6,"_17":10,"_18":19,"_20":21,"_22":10,"_23":-5,"_24":-5,"_25":10},"user",{"_7":8,"_9":10,"_11":10,"_12":-5,"_13":-5,"_14":15,"_16":-5},"roles",[],"isAuthenticated",false,"isPremium","planName","subscriptionStatus","featureFlags",{},"insightsBudget","isDevelopmentHost","userPreferences",{},"recaptchaSiteKey","6LcvOJcUAAAAAHsB-gPGfGktcRlKpH7OTIU_dMTD","isImpersonating","impersonation","affiliateStatus","isFreedomPortal","routes/v2/article/layout",{"_28":29,"_30":31},"notFound",true,"relatedArticles",[32,75,87],{"_33":34,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":40,"_41":42,"_43":44,"_45":46,"_47":48,"_49":50,"_51":52,"_53":54,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":60,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":66,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},"mediaId",6428494,"mediaKeyId","5882534-bede93b5259938cfb8d8328d7efb7856","parentId",5882534,"title","At a glance: Umatilla County board approves routine contracts, payments and facility changes","audioSeconds",1045,"startMs",4660000,"endMs",5705000,"viewUrl","/Search/View?dp=1&key=5882534-bede93b5259938cfb8d8328d7efb7856&start=4660&end=5705","thumbnailUrl","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5882534-bede93b5259938cfb8d8328d7efb7856/thumbnail_4660000.jpg","articleUrl","/articles/6428494/Umatilla-County/Oregon/At-a-glance-Umatilla-County-board-approves-routine-contracts-payments-and-facility-changes","mediaUrl","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6428494-08a17ddd60522652dedd7e65930656f6/orig.mp4?Expires=1775143611&Signature=l7I0upvJZOfd4FCrf9~5LLvMBgR~514RRbqUTdRN5-xlv52MWWJB3iDGJN7wObZdlOMhmjaeRLXmmOkDvJB5SEla0lBklDw7Saizqj0jlxB0HLR040DKR5fpKX0rFaDaed6-mhXwcHYtiIOS7Ars9AUTRvESrkS4Azlr8Jz2aNEFQCnlYHpcDaqI7~18CHEEzZoXqmA-6Jy3ESn7vrgAmD5TWk2r0fD4DUvvGqnXUpkTf4YXwz5cSU-huT5pVCZcXoEEgha3~9hk4~raFimHUyVV~20Q~xovLTOJ8Qoy~fM35ljWiAMH6FF5E2dpONefBUKeVZv72-ar3O8A45KGVw__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","author","Umatilla County","date","2025-10-02T18:40:10Z","article","Umatilla County commissioners approved multiple routine contracts, payables and facility items during their Oct. 12 meeting. The items were considered individually and passed by voice vote; the record shows unanimous approval for the listed items.

Key approvals and votes recorded at the meeting included:

- Controlled‑access system expansion: Approved payment of $6,797.20 to add two doors and system expansion to track access to ballot storage and the north entrance. County staff said each door expands future cards/slots and is needed to meet ballot‑storage tracking requirements.

- Exterior window cleaning: Approved vendor work totaling $5,520 to clean exterior windows at multiple county buildings; staff said the work has been done periodically and the company supplied the only responsive bid above the county purchasing threshold.

- Property reporting alert system: Approved a county subscription to a property‑reporting notification service that allows residents (or their designees) to sign up for free alerts when their name or property is reported in county records. Staff emphasized the service is a notification tool, not a protection product.

- Sheriff's office inmate clothing purchase: Approved payment of $5,870.74 to Bob Barker Company for inmate clothing; jail staff reported clothing is laundered and reused as needed.

- Emergency management — Community Wildfire Protection Plan (CWPP): Approved payment of $31,710 to Northwest Management Inc. for CWPP work; the board previously accepted the plan and staff said the project was fully grant funded and not charged to the general fund.

- Emergency management pass‑through to Pilot Rock: Approved acceptance and pass‑through of a $5,000 Pacific Power Foundation grant to the City of Pilot Rock to fund generator replacement; emergency management staff said the pass‑through eases administrative burden on a small city.

- Developmental Disabilities vehicle: Approved a $29,000 payable for a vehicle for the county DD program; staff said the purchase is reimbursed by the state.

- CARE office lease extension: Approved a five‑year lease for additional CARE office suite space at Banner Bank, at $625 per month with a $5 annual increase; staff said the lease addresses the CARE office relocation needs.

- Northeast Oregon Water Association dues: Approved the county's annual dues (amounting to $2,500 for the association plus an additional county contribution) citing the association's legislative and permitting assistance for local water projects.

Most motions were moved and seconded by board members without individual names captured in the public record; votes were recorded as voice votes with “aye” responses and the chair announcing the motion carried.

Why it matters: several approvals affect election operations (ballot storage access control), emergency preparedness (CWPP funding, Pilot Rock generator), public information services (property‑reporting alerts), and routine facility and service contracts. Staff flagged that some items were grant‑funded or reimbursed by state/federal sources and therefore do not use general fund dollars.

Commissioners did not request additional public hearings on these items and no items were tabled.","mediaType","Video","parentTitle","BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS MEETING Oct 01, 2025","oneSentenceSummary","Umatilla County commissioners approved several contracts, payables and facility actions Oct. 12, including security doors for ballot storage, a $31,710 CWPP payable, a $5,000 pass‑through grant to Pilot Rock and a $29,000 state‑reimbursed DD vehicle purchase.","taxTitle","Umatilla County, Oregon","taxId",54126,"location","headline","","shortSummary",{"_33":76,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":77,"_41":78,"_43":79,"_45":80,"_47":81,"_49":82,"_51":83,"_53":84,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":85,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":86,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6428501,"Umatilla County schedules second reading of ATV ordinance after public hearing on permits and safety",2130,2492000,4622000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5882534-bede93b5259938cfb8d8328d7efb7856&start=2492&end=4622","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5882534-bede93b5259938cfb8d8328d7efb7856/thumbnail_2492000.jpg","/articles/6428501/Umatilla-County/Oregon/Umatilla-County-schedules-second-reading-of-ATV-ordinance-after-public-hearing-on-permits-and-safety","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6428501-18d8329f52c96a1a8fb9f773be779a85/orig.mp4?Expires=1775143611&Signature=etGHXkAVm03m~DYlrK~nq5DPZD9geoDTrVxS9ghGN6YwpNhL8KMxUjf-0PIctrQOGe8PPDxPDSGF9gSehTV23OuUdwphRN~7m92WZyLBNkN35U~C-fh-3MB-LhWsUpDgZ7iGPfQL0Ps4PAeRZ2jJGcPIRQ4jNIHbi1ybqMfhCiuGaZopIE0pvALb8TBlqb8Pg4sVwYVWBI4mPfe1PUg0n3DziioF4y2Ll1TsjfgvXzu4vYt43Tnah3TBzdXnu9lIm~cnDvFxqrEvV6l2gH6~MW0om3iHJLUFrG5~u520lJ73aCbH7vo-59qEYynhNp8zqOgyu1reBYtE7NZq8QlPQg__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Umatilla County commissioners held a public hearing Oct. 12 on the first reading of an all‑terrain vehicle (ATV/UTV) ordinance that would permit on‑road, on‑county‑road operation of certain off‑highway vehicles within a defined area of the county. Commissioners voted to set a second reading for Oct. 15, advancing the ordinance process.

Staff explained revisions since earlier drafts: the ordinance’s geographic area was clarified (the northern boundary begins at Highway 11 and proceeds south toward Pendleton, with an eastern/western boundary defined in the draft) and the permit requirement was narrowed so that the county permit would apply to Class 1 vehicles only. County staff said the county permit is intended to provide enforcement officers with a locally issued decal and to document insurance for vehicles using county roads; staff also said the permit process helps correlate use with distribution of gas‑tax funds.

Public commenters questioned whether the county permit duplicates the State of Oregon sticker and testing, the proposed fee (staff noted a $10 fee had been discussed), operator versus vehicle permits, and enforcement during burn bans. Alan Stibler of Athena asked how the mapped area was chosen and whether street‑legal, out‑of‑state vehicles would be affected if the ordinance were adopted. Other speakers raised safety concerns on narrow rural roads, the potential for increased crash and fire risk, and whether Forest Service lands and forest roads would be affected; staff said the U.S. Forest Service has been engaged in discussions but federal staff were not present because of the federal shutdown.

A resident raised the question of permitting for passengers and whether permits attach to the operator or to a specific vehicle; county staff replied the permit is intended to be vehicle‑based but noted some details remain to be defined in the implementation plan. Commissioners asked staff to prepare the ordinance for a second reading; a commissioner also requested a written recap of program details.

Outcome: commissioners moved, seconded and approved scheduling the ordinance second reading for Oct. 15 (motion passed). No ordinance adoption occurred at the Oct. 12 meeting; further changes may be made ahead of the second reading.

Why it matters: the ordinance would change where and how certain OHVs may operate on county roads, with implications for public safety, enforcement workload, coordination with state and federal land managers and potential impacts to local traffic and emergency response.

Direct quotes in the record are limited by the public‑hearing format and multiple speakers. County staff stressed the ordinance is meant to provide an enforcement mechanism and to document insurance and permitting status for county roads; residents repeatedly urged a focus on safety, signage, and clarity about burn‑ban restrictions and Forest Service access.","After a public hearing on an all‑terrain vehicle ordinance that clarified the geographic boundaries and limited permit requirements, Umatilla County commissioners scheduled a second reading for Oct. 15. Residents raised concerns about child safety, enforcement, burn ban communication and Forest Service coordination.",{"_33":88,"_35":36,"_37":38,"_39":89,"_41":90,"_43":91,"_45":92,"_47":93,"_49":94,"_51":95,"_53":96,"_55":56,"_57":58,"_59":97,"_61":62,"_63":64,"_65":98,"_67":68,"_69":70,"_71":68,"_72":73,"_74":73},6428510,"Walla Walla Watershed Council outlines restoration projects, funding challenges to Umatilla County",2142,319000,2461000,"/Search/View?dp=1&key=5882534-bede93b5259938cfb8d8328d7efb7856&start=319&end=2461","https://assets.pipeline.soar.com/5882534-bede93b5259938cfb8d8328d7efb7856/thumbnail_319000.jpg","/articles/6428510/Umatilla-County/Oregon/Walla-Walla-Watershed-Council-outlines-restoration-projects-funding-challenges-to-Umatilla-County","https://secure.pipeline.soar.com/6428510-c2527f4a6cb1e0760dca057d90dae83c/orig.mp4?Expires=1775143611&Signature=jOGZXJF67kaZZkb3Cd6dyTQMiHh~6qJgxUo9f7tEEqAean7j5UOCqMI5kB8jWLhGZJDNscczKD8PuI3FFnMVt0Ify4rJI8pQIowTodwY~NrDPL-MpC2DmySaNvC5x2xDGUmIf5H~eb65EPfvyUGiQyjN-F0o-ipjcwWQdv3KzJgQZBH4aamPIB3IIZJl94Ol6szLwmWCu7bYtjRxT9otksSQ0U7VnSVdj6xCXoPnfmHGUHCKDuAe8xuyYqyC8mwcE58QsPgW08aaVYaVjOBGFDd~qDx4BNZ0-kYkxQ9w-VB5dDuxfP4iJnphmc8xozcAVvyY0bLbgKZPfPT41Hvgug__&Key-Pair-Id=KUT5TJCACFTXG","Michelle McClellan, executive director of the Walla Walla Watershed Council, told Umatilla County commissioners on Oct. 12 that the council is advancing stream and spring restoration work across the basin while facing multi‑year permitting and grant challenges.

McClellan said the council is focusing on tributary habitat improvements, spring mapping and a long‑standing alluvial aquifer recharge program that did not operate last year because the council’s temporary water right application remains under state review. “Our application has been held up in the review level for 18 months now,” McClellan said during a roughly 30‑ to 40‑minute presentation. She also described a recent change in grant payment schedules by the Oregon Department of Agriculture that shifts many grantees from a 50/50 payment model to a 90/10 front‑loaded payment, creating cash‑flow stress for nonprofits.

Tara Patton, deputy director, summarized the council’s on‑the‑ground work: “Our projects are…to improve watershed health while at the same time supporting agriculture and a sustainable economy,” she said. The council staff described projects on Cal Creek, the North Fork Walla Walla River, Dry Creek and Lower Pine Creek; a spring inventory and base‑flow assessment in partnership with the U.S. Forest Service and the city of Walla Walla; and an effort to support dryland agricultural producers through technical assistance with the Umatilla Soil and Water Conservation District.

The council highlighted engineered log jams and rock structures placed in the North Fork following the 2020 flood, and said snorkel surveys and redd counts in restored reaches found fish using the new habitat. McClellan cautioned that monitoring is early and does not yet prove population-scale increases but said the habitat is being used by multiple age classes of salmonids.

On groundwater recharge, staff said the council’s five‑year temporary water right is up for renewal and that the Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) review has taken longer than prior renewals because of an influx of applications and a change in some irrigation‑district participation. The delay prevented recharge operations around Milton‑Freewater in the past year.

The council also announced a new endowment at the Blue Mountain Community Foundation intended to provide unrestricted operating funds; McClellan said that step is intended to reduce the organization’s dependence on competitive grants. Staff described outreach efforts including a bilingual website update, an October 21 advisory committee open house at Whitman College, a service day with Walla Walla University and youth education programs funded by the Oregon Conservation and Recreation Fund and the Oregon Community Foundation.

Commissioners asked for a short written recap about the OWRD permit status; McClellan said the council’s steward in Salem is Mary Bjork and that she will request an update and share a bullet‑point recap with the county.

Why it matters: the council’s work supports summertime stream flow and aquatic habitat for resident and anadromous fish while intersecting with farm operations and water‑supply infrastructure in Umatilla County and the broader Walla Walla basin. Delays in state permitting and changes to grant disbursement policies affect the council’s ability to implement projects on private land and to operate recharge sites.

The council did not seek or receive any formal county action during the presentation; commissioners asked staff to accept a written update on the OWRD permit and directed no other formal motions.

McClellan and Patton closed by inviting commissioners and the public to upcoming outreach events and said the council will continue work on project monitoring, irrigation partnerships and dryland agriculture support.","Walla Walla Watershed Council leaders briefed Umatilla County commissioners on a suite of stream, spring and upland projects, described an 18‑month delay in an Oregon Water Resources Department recharge permit and warned of shifting grant rules that affect project cash flow.","actionData","errors"]

Article not found

At a glance: Umatilla County board approves routine contracts, payments and facility changes

Umatilla County schedules second reading of ATV ordinance after public hearing on permits and safety

Walla Walla Watershed Council outlines restoration projects, funding challenges to Umatilla County