The Santa Ana City Council meeting on October 7, 2025, was dominated by a heated discussion surrounding the potential censure of Councilman Jonathan Hernandez, following allegations of harassment made against him by three police officers. Hernandez, who spoke passionately at the podium, argued that the censure would infringe upon his First Amendment rights and stifle dissenting opinions within the council.

Hernandez highlighted the contentious relationship between the Santa Ana Police Department and the community, citing significant financial costs related to police misconduct and a troubling history of civilian complaints. He asserted that the move to censure him was an attempt to silence his advocacy for civil rights and accountability, emphasizing that it would also undermine the voices of his constituents.

The city attorney clarified that the council was tasked with deciding whether to pursue a censure process, which could involve appointing an ad hoc committee to investigate the allegations further. Several council members expressed their support for due process, acknowledging the need for a thorough investigation into the claims against Hernandez while also recognizing the importance of protecting the rights of all city employees.

Council members debated the implications of the censure, with some arguing it was necessary to hold Hernandez accountable for his behavior, while others cautioned against the potential legal ramifications of such a decision. Ultimately, the council agreed to move forward with an investigation into the allegations, aiming to bring the findings back for discussion in early January.

This contentious meeting underscored the ongoing tensions between elected officials and law enforcement in Santa Ana, as well as the broader issues of accountability and free speech within local government. The outcome of the investigation could have significant implications for Hernandez's political future and the council's relationship with the police department.