The Clark County Council meeting on October 2, 2025, focused on the contentious use of Camp Bonneville, particularly regarding law enforcement activities by agencies such as the ATF, SWAT, and MEDU. Public comments highlighted concerns over the environmental impact and legality of these operations on the conservation land.

Patty Reynolds, a local resident, emphasized that the reuse plan established in 1996 was intended for economic development and conservation, not for the storage or detonation of explosives. She criticized the ongoing use of the land by law enforcement agencies, arguing that it has led to contamination and financial burdens on county taxpayers. Reynolds called for the removal of all explosives from the site and urged the council to reassess the outdated reuse plan to ensure proper cleanup and conservation efforts.

Anne Shaw echoed these sentiments, stating that the use of Camp Bonneville by law enforcement is inappropriate and has not been compensated. She pointed out that agreements allowing such use have expired, and there is no legal basis for the continued activities of these agencies on the property. Shaw highlighted the lack of transparency regarding the extent of contamination and the financial implications for the county.

Greg Shaw added further concerns, urging the council to clarify the definitions of the various SWAT teams involved and to terminate all agreements with the ATF and MEDU. He criticized past decisions made by former county officials that allowed these agencies to operate without proper authority or compensation.

The discussions raised significant questions about the management of Camp Bonneville and the responsibilities of law enforcement agencies regarding environmental protection and public trust. The council is now faced with the challenge of addressing these issues, potentially leading to a reevaluation of agreements and a renewed focus on conservation and cleanup efforts.