During the California Board of Psychology meeting on August 22, 2025, a significant public comment session highlighted concerns regarding the board's disciplinary processes and their impact on mental health practitioners.

Patricia Lindquist, a seasoned psychologist with 45 years of experience, voiced her apprehensions about the increasing duration of probationary periods and disciplinary actions faced by therapists. She pointed out that these lengthy processes can create financial strain and discourage professionals from working with challenging patients, particularly those with personality disorders. Lindquist emphasized that the fear of retaliation from patients could lead to a reluctance among therapists to engage with dysregulated individuals, ultimately affecting the quality of care provided.

The board reminded attendees that discussions during the public comment section could not address specific cases or complaints, adhering to the Open Meetings Act to maintain procedural integrity. This restriction aims to protect both the board's mission and the interests of the speakers.

The meeting underscored the delicate balance between ensuring accountability within the profession and fostering an environment where therapists feel safe to work with all patients. As the board continues to navigate these challenges, the implications of such discussions will be crucial for the future of mental health care in California.