Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board Authorizes Appeal in Closed Session; Long Records Sole Dissent

September 23, 2025 | Shasta County, California


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board Authorizes Appeal in Closed Session; Long Records Sole Dissent
The Shasta County Board of Supervisors voted 4–1 in closed session on Sept. 23 to authorize an appeal of a matter the board discussed behind closed doors. County counsel announced the vote at the conclusion of the meeting but gave no further details about the substance of the case.

County Counsel Joe Larmer reported on the closed-session outcome, saying, “Item R4. The board voted 4 to 1 to authorize an appeal of the matter. R5 no reportable act.” The board then identified Supervisor Patrick Long as the lone dissenting vote.

By statute, the board is permitted to discuss pending litigation in closed session and report only limited outcomes. The board did not disclose the subject matter of the litigation during open session, and Larmer said the vote was the only reportable action.

Supervisor Long was recorded as the nay vote when the chair asked for identification of the vote split. The board did not provide additional public materials or a schedule for any filings related to the authorized appeal.

View the Full Meeting & All Its Details

This article offers just a summary. Unlock complete video, transcripts, and insights as a Founder Member.

Watch full, unedited meeting videos
Search every word spoken in unlimited transcripts
AI summaries & real-time alerts (all government levels)
Permanent access to expanding government content
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep California articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI
Family Portal
Family Portal