Get email alerts on the Research Village Phase 3 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
APC approves Research Village Phase 3 planned development; vote unanimous
Summary
The Area Plan Commission approved Resolution PD25-12 for Research Village Phase 3, authorizing final development plans (FDPs) and construction plans for a mix of detached homes and townhomes adjacent to existing Research Village phases.
Get email alerts on the Research Village Phase 3 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Area Plan Commission voted unanimously to approve Resolution PD25-12 for Research Village Phase 3, allowing the project to proceed to final development plans (FDPs) and construction plan review.
APC staff planner Nathan McBurnett presented the case, describing the proposal as adjacent to Research Village Phases 1 and 2 and noting an OR‑zoned property to the south owned by the Purdue Research Foundation. McBurnett described the mix and counts of proposed housing: “It the project is gonna be, all single family homes. It'll be up to, I think, 27 detached products. 27 front front loaded single family lots, 14 rear loaded single family lots, and 34 townhomes. The townhomes will front right there along Roundtable Road.” He noted the committee would be voting without the final plat; the approval would authorize FDPs and construction plans.
Ryan Munnon, representing the petitioner, said the applicant agreed with staff recommendations and that his client “is excited to get started.” No members of the public spoke on the petition. The commission recorded a unanimous ballot for approval and the chair announced the motion carried.
The approval allows the petitioner to proceed with FDP and construction plan submittals; no final plat was approved at the meeting.
AI generated
The text on this page is AI generated. Summaries, highlights, analysis, and video transcripts are all produced from the original source material.
AI can make mistakes, so if you spot one, and we will fix it for everyone.
Note: the source content is unaltered by us. Any content source we link to, be it a video, an audio recording, or a document, is presented exactly as its publisher released it. That publisher is usually a government body, sometimes an individual official or another organisation.

