Board votes in closed session to defend claim and retain outside counsel

5911729 · October 7, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After closed session on Oct. 7 the board disclosed a single reportable action: a 5-0 vote to defend a pending claim and to retain outside counsel.

Shasta County counsel reported out after closed session on Oct. 7 that the Board of Supervisors voted unanimously to defend a pending claim against the county and to retain outside counsel.

County Counsel Joe Larimer told the board and public, on the record after closed session, that R6 (closed-session item) produced no reportable action. For R7, Larimer reported the board voted five-zero “to defend the claim and hire outside counsel.” Larimer gave no further details in open session about the nature of the claim or legal strategy; the board conducted the substantive discussion in closed session.

Why this matters: A public report that the board has chosen to defend a claim and hire outside counsel indicates the county will continue litigation or administrative defense rather than negotiate an immediate settlement. The board’s decision could have financial and risk-management implications; the transcript did not disclose details such as potential liability amounts or the identity of the claimant.

County counsel said no further report was available in open session.