Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Public commenter urges transparency at Garnet Health, cites financial losses and service cuts

October 09, 2025 | Sullivan County, New York


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Public commenter urges transparency at Garnet Health, cites financial losses and service cuts
During the public-comment period, Ken Walter identified himself as a co-chair of a local legislative-action committee and presented an analysis he said was compiled from Garnet Health tax filings and other public records. Walter said the hospital system posted losses of roughly $10 million in 2022 and $7 million in 2023 and that it received a $27 million government grant related to ARPA funds in 2020.

Walter said local representation on the hospital board has dropped and that services and staffing have declined—he cited a fall in total employees from a previous high (879) to 732 in 2022—and alleged that service cuts have included lab reductions and an emergency-room closure in Catskill. He said transporting patients from the county to other facilities strains neighboring emergency departments and described the situation as “totally unfair” to local residents.

Walter urged greater public transparency, saying, “If they want our money, open your **** books,” and asked why the state Department of Health was not more active in overseeing decisions he described as harmful to local care. He said he would pursue further action and that more information would follow.

Why it matters: Garnet Health is a major local health-care provider; public concerns about service reductions and financial stability can affect access to care and prompt scrutiny by elected officials and regulators. The transcript records the public speaker’s assertions but does not provide independent confirmation of the financial or operational claims.

Meeting context: the remarks came during the public-comment period and were not an agenda item; no county action was recorded in response during the meeting.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New York articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI