Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Housing Affordability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Developer asks council to allow CRA assignment to enable lower-priced townhomes as buffer near industrial park
Summary
Developers and their consultants urged the council to allow a CRA (tax-abatement) assignment on land inside the existing district so they can deliver deeded townhomes priced lower than area single-family houses and provide a buffer between industrial and residential uses.
A redevelopment firm asked council to consider assigning a portion of the existing Rickenbacker Exchange Community Reinvestment Area (CRA) to support construction of deeded townhomes intended as lower-priced, higher-density housing and as a landscaped buffer between industrial property and adjacent single-family neighborhoods.
The presenter said the parcel falls within the existing CRA and that assigning CRA benefits to the project would make townhomes financially feasible at lower price points—roughly $300,000–$400,000 per unit in the developer’s presentation—versus conventional single-family lots in the village. He said the village’s property-tax share on one typical house is small and that the proposed units would still pay municipal payroll tax and generate other local revenue.
Council and staff discussion focused on precedent, how CRA assignment is implemented, and whether assignments could be made to multiple buyers over time. The presenter said the CRA can be structured so that tax benefits follow individual deeded units, but council asked the solicitor and fiscal officer to confirm how pilot payments or other payments would apply in this scenario.
Neighbors and a council member asked about potential impacts on property values and school capacity. The developer said the townhome product would be well-appointed and cited nearby examples of townhome-style neighborhoods as comparable. The recommendation from the developer was that council discuss whether the village wants to encourage affordable, lower-density housing as a policy and, if so, direct staff to prepare a formal assignment mechanism and supporting resolution.
Ending: Council did not vote. Staff and the solicitor will work with the developer to draft formal language explaining how an assignment would operate and what obligations would apply; the council asked for fiscal estimates and school-impact information before any decision.
