Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board denies setback variance for four-car garages on North College Avenue

October 07, 2025 | Indianapolis City, Marion County, Indiana


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Board denies setback variance for four-car garages on North College Avenue
The Metropolitan Board of Zoning Appeals Division 1 denied a variance request Wednesday that would have allowed four-car detached garages with three-foot side-yard setbacks on two infill lots at 2429 and 2431 North College Avenue.

The petitioner, Redevelopment Group LLC, sought variances of development standards to construct attached four-car garages behind duplex units on both lots. The firm argued that a 40-foot garage footprint is a reasonable modern standard and that narrow garages would reduce marketability for prospective buyers who want storage and room for car doors.

Why it matters: The board found that the lots have sufficient width to accommodate compliant parking spaces without reduced setbacks. Staff noted the residential parking-space standard is 8.5 feet per space; multiplied by four spaces yields 34 feet, leaving two feet of additional width before any variance would be needed. Staff concluded there was no practical difficulty that would justify the requested variance and recommended denial.

Josh Dubeck, representing Redevelopment Group, said the developer has completed similar projects downtown and that detached garage space is an important market amenity. He said the requested dimensions matched other recent projects the developer completed and cited six letters of support from nearby owners.

Staff emphasized the project could meet required parking without a variance and that the board’s statutory findings for a variance were not met. After discussion, the board voted 3–1 to deny the variance (2025‑DV1‑043); Jennifer Witt cast the lone yes vote.

What’s next: The petitioner may revise the design to conform to setback and parking rules or choose an alternate parking arrangement that does not require reduced side-yard setbacks.

Don't Miss a Word: See the Full Meeting!

Go beyond summaries. Unlock every video, transcript, and key insight with a Founder Membership.

Get instant access to full meeting videos
Search and clip any phrase from complete transcripts
Receive AI-powered summaries & custom alerts
Enjoy lifetime, unrestricted access to government data
Access Full Meeting

30-day money-back guarantee

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep Indiana articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI