Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Reporting Requirements topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission tables Adebo Ali Douglas report review; asks for full signed reports and addenda
Summary
Connecticut appraisal board tabled review of applicant Adebo Ali Douglas (Badmus) after staff and commissioners found submitted sample reports were missing key attachments and signatures; board asked for the original signed reports and all addenda for review at a future meeting.
The commission tabled the sample‑report review for RCR applicant Adebo Ali Douglas (Badmus) and asked the candidate and supervisor to provide the complete signed reports the applicant submitted to clients, including interior and comparable photos, sketches and all addenda.
Reviewing commissioners and staff said the versions submitted for the board’s review appeared to be sanitized copies or incomplete exports that lacked core supporting material: comparable photos, interior photos of the subject, building sketches and visible signatures on the reports. The applicant and his supervisor told the board that the full signed reports exist but that they had provided redacted or sample copies to avoid disclosing client names. The commission noted that as a regulatory board it needs the actual file as submitted to the client (the “four corners” of the report) to evaluate work product.
Why it matters: Board reviewers said they cannot evaluate methodology, adjustments, or compliance with USPAP without the full signed reports and supporting exhibits. The commission will not advance the applicant’s experience credits until staff receives the complete originals for review.
Details and next steps: The commission asked the candidate’s supervisor to send the full signed reports and addenda to staff as soon as possible. Once staff disseminates the full files to commissioners, the item will be placed back on a future agenda for review. The chair reminded applicants that signed, complete files are required for regulatory review and that the board is authorized to review original work product.
