Limited Time Offer. Become a Founder Member Now!

Council hears overview of proposed warrant articles, debate centers on revaluation and transfer-station building costs

October 08, 2025 | Hooksett, Merrimack County , New Hampshire


This article was created by AI summarizing key points discussed. AI makes mistakes, so for full details and context, please refer to the video of the full meeting. Please report any errors so we can fix them. Report an error »

Council hears overview of proposed warrant articles, debate centers on revaluation and transfer-station building costs
The Hooksett Town Council spent an extended portion of its Oct. 8 meeting reviewing potential warrant articles for the 2026–27 budget and discussing priorities, grouping options and funding sources.

Christine (Finance Director) and staff walked councilors through recurring capital-reserve warrants and several proposed new items. On the revaluation, Christine said the town has $30,000 currently in a revaluation account and staff recommended saving toward a statistical update in 2028. Council discussion clarified the estimate of a statistical update as roughly two years at $110,000 per year (i.e., $110,000 requested in the first year), producing about $250,000 including the existing $30,000 in the account. Christine summarized: “we have 30,000 in the account currently, and we estimate needing…$2.50” (meaning approximately $250,000 total saved over the proposed period). The meeting record shows some councilors and the former assessor had previously recommended a full-value revaluation but staff noted the statistical update has been the town’s prior and typical approach.

Councilors urged fuller voter-guide explanations that the revaluation is required and that funding in advance smooths tax impacts. A councilor asked whether the state would force a revaluation and whether unpaid revaluation costs could be imposed on the town; staff said the state Department of Revenue Administration can compel a revaluation and, if the town did not plan for it, the state-contracted work could create an unplanned bill.

Other warrant items discussed:
- Retirement expendable trust: Christine said $150,000 was added in 2021 and most of that has been spent; staff proposed replenishing the account with $100,000 to cover retirements without inflating the operating budget in any single year.
- DPW vehicles capital reserve: staff proposed a $250,000 warrant to maintain vehicle replacement schedules; DPW described the need to replace older plow trucks (t106, a 2006 Freightliner, and t105, a 2005 Freightliner) and noted ordering lead times of nine months to a year.
- Building maintenance reserve: routine capital reserve for roofs, HVAC and boilers at town buildings.
- Drainage/stormwater projects: staff highlighted older drainage in areas such as Pinnacle, Hummingbird and Morningfair and said the sewer department’s new TV camera system will help inspect storm drains to better target repairs.
- Parks and recreation facilities: ongoing reserve (proposed $50,000) to fund items like Petersburg field lighting, track and tennis repairs and Lambert’s Park pavilion costs.
- Scale house and retaining wall at the transfer station: staff presented 60% construction drawings and reported the engineer’s estimate exceeds the $450,000 warrant currently proposed — “the engineer's estimate is over 2 times what we have here,” Ben said. Staff said one funding option under review is bonding the project and paying debt service from the transfer-station special revenue fund so there would be no general-taxation impact. Ben and Christine said they will present options including bonding and that the recycle/transfer advisory committee will review the 60% drawings before council action.

Finance staff reported a June 30, 2025 fund balance of $5,097,231, an increase of roughly $500,000 from the prior year; the finance director and staff stressed the trade-offs between using fund balance for warrant items vs. placing items on the ballot for voter approval.

No final votes were taken on warrant articles at Oct. 8; council members requested clearer voter-guide language and additional analysis of bonding and fund-balance options before placing items on the ballot.

View full meeting

This article is based on a recent meeting—watch the full video and explore the complete transcript for deeper insights into the discussion.

View full meeting

Sponsors

Proudly supported by sponsors who keep New Hampshire articles free in 2025

Scribe from Workplace AI
Scribe from Workplace AI