Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Building Codes topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission votes 3-2 to extend county building-code adoption to two northern townships; raises storm-shelter questions

5914564 · October 8, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission directed staff to proceed with a public hearing to adopt an updated building code (2012 IRC/IBC) and voted 3-2 to include Kickapoo and Easton townships under the county code update, amid commissioner concerns about slab homes and storm-shelter policy.

Leavenworth County commissioners considered a staff recommendation and a code-appeals board review of updated building codes and voted to include Kickapoo and Easton townships in a countywide building-code adoption that moves from the 2006 code to the 2012 IRC and IBC standards.

Staff said the county’s code-appeals board recommended the 2012 International Residential Code (IRC) and International Building Code (IBC) and asked commissioners to set a public hearing to adopt the updates. Commissioners debated both the scope of coverage and storm-safety issues for slab-on-grade homes.

Key points: - Code change: Staff said the proposal is a code update from the county’s current 2006 code to the 2012 IRC/IBC. The county’s code-appeals board recommended the 2012 versions and staff returned with draft amendments. - Geographic scope: Commissioners voted 3-2 to include Kickapoo and Easton townships — two northern townships that previously were not subject to the county’s voluntary code adoption — and directed staff to set a public hearing for formal adoption. - Storm-shelter question: Multiple commissioners raised safety concerns tied to the proliferation of slab houses (houses without basements). Staff provided a permitting statistic: since July 2020, the county had issued 569 single-family permits in unincorporated areas; 246 (about 43%) were slab-on-grade with no basement. Commissioners debated whether larger subdivisions should require safe rooms or other shelter options as a public-safety matter, and staff said that surrounding counties queried did not require storm shelters as a condition of subdivisions.

Why it matters: adopting a more recent code changes minimum construction standards and can affect build costs, inspections and insurance. Extending the code more widely in the county raises enforcement and inspection questions; staff noted inspections and a formal building department would entail additional costs.

Outcome and next steps: The commission approved adding Kickapoo and Easton townships to the code-update process by a 3-2 vote and asked staff to set a date for the public hearing to adopt the 2012 codes; staff recommended revisiting inspection capacity and long-term enforcement options during implementation planning.

Ending: Commissioners signaled urgency on completing the code update that has been under consideration for several years but differed on enforcement mechanisms and storm-safety requirements for dense, slab-based subdivisions.